Murchison-Eye

F-35 category

I guess I could have just put my comment from the edit description here. But, oh well... I listed my reasoning, and if you still disagree I'd really like to hear yours (since you didn't make it clear when you removed the heading). I know its a really minor detail. But seems like a good enough time as any to learn more about a fellow editor. You seem to be a constructive regular on the current events portal. I can think of at least one time we've butted heads in the portal (i suspect we may be on different sides of the political spectrum, which is totally fine btw). But I'd like to make sure I'm a constructive editor as well. Just dropping a line to be friendly, and get to know the other editors.Spoonlesscorey (talk) 23:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit: I just looked at your profile and realized I confused you with another editorSpoonlesscorey (talk) 23:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Spoonlesscorey:,the F-35 article is already linked in the event sentence so duplicating it adds nothing other than redundancy. Headings are generally used for ongoing Events or Categories that a story if "Part of", like putting a battle under the heading of the War it is part of. If you look at the other heading in "Current Events" none of them are physical objects (like a fighter jet) they are events or categories. Murchison-Eye (talk) 23:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Cool! Good to know. This editing stuff seemed simple when I first jumped into it, but there is a lot to learn. Thanks.Spoonlesscorey (talk) 23:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

No problem @Spoonlesscorey:, Some things like this you just have to pick up as you go :) Murchison-Eye (talk) 23:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Your recent editing history at Millennium Challenge 2002 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Toddst1:, thanks for your interest, if you see here I'm actually tring to resolve this properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murchison-Eye (talk • contribs) 21:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

That's good, but it is not a licence to continue reverting. Toddst1 (talk) 22:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Signing posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

I would like to welcome you to Wikipedia also :), its been a big day and I forgot to sign. Murchison-Eye (talk) 22:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Murchison-Eye. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Your recent editing history at Kerch Polytechnic College massacre shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.86.34 (talk) 01:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi :) Welcome to Wikipedia, please familiarise yourself with WP:WAR to gain a more accurate understanding of our "edit war" policy. Murchison-Eye (talk) 01:25, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 9K720 Iskander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uragan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Renaming Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel to United States recognition of Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel. 2600:1700:BBD0:8050:3C78:A0BB:680D:657F (talk) 03:22, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 10:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, thanks for editing American decline. Please consider the page for making further edits, if you're interested. Regards. --Mhhossein ^talk 12:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Mhhossein: and thank you for the invitation. It is a page I am interested in and I would certainly like to help improve on it in the future. Murchison-Eye (talk) 20:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome and thanks for accepting the invitation. --Mhhossein ^talk 05:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Gulf of Oman incident Article

Hi Murchison-Eye. I rod your Article Gulf of Oman incident. I found that you have made some mistake in your Article. For example, the Fujairah port location is Persian Gulf Not Gulf of Oman. I corrected the Mistake and Also I will expand the Article. Please do not change the Article title and let to speak about all changes. It's look like you don't know the region completely.And remember I'm here to help you to keep the article and expanding it.Forest90 (talk) 22:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Forest90: You are wrong, The Persian gulf is the water beyond the Straight of Hormuz, see the nearby image which also shows Fujairah, if you look at the Fujairah article it even mentions that it is on the Gulf of Oman and not the Persian gulf. If you need any more assistance with the geography of the Middle east don't hesitate to ask. Murchison-Eye (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I made a mistake. you are right. And I changed the main Subject of Article, if you have more suggestion, we can redirest it to the Article, too.Forest90 (talk) 22:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

That's ok, we all can make mistakes :) its good to see more information in the article. Murchison-Eye (talk) 23:13, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Some WikiLove!

		Cookies!
		HeartGlow30797 has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Hey, I see you have been discouraged and would love to thank you for all your hard work! Keep going and if you need any help, contact me on my talk page! HeartGlow (talk) 10:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC) To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!