Mumbai0618

Djdjjdjxnxhxhxjjchrhdhdjfhhf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.214.158.125 (talk) 22:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

I see you keep on making certain edits over and over again, despite my instructions saying they are not appropriate for wikipedia. Perhaps discussing them in more detail will help. Below are some examples, and why they're not appropriate:

• It was originally released in late 2006 on the Xbox 360, but was released early 2007 on the Playstation 3 due to critical ire.
  • This sentence is awkward for a number of reasons. First, "ire" isn't really an appropriate word to use in this situation. The definition to "ire" is Great anger; wrath, fury . Reception is usually measured in a positive to negative type scale, not "degrees of rage", so that word choice isn't the best. "Very negative" is sufficient. "Ire" also violates the WP:NPOV policy.
• Sonic game and the first to not appeal to ages due to it's immense fantasy violence
  • Unless you provide a source for this, it is original research, and not acceptable. You need a source to back this up, as it doesn't seem to be especially mature compared to other Sonic games.
• Despite this, it was the most negatively received in the series with just 49% on GameRankings.com.
  • This is too detailed to be in the intro. It already says reception was negative, more detailed examples go in the Reception section. (And it's already in the reception section.) Additionally, it's awkward because only 1 of the 2 versions received this percentage.
• The game was originally slated for release in February 2007; however Microsoft, Sony, and the public started complaining as they wanted it closer to the release of their consoles. So Sega started rushing the game, only to leave out numerous points of data (see Reception).
  • Not true, and that's not what the reception section says either. It didn't have a set release date, and then moved it up to meet pressure, the PS3 version was delayed because that version took longer to make. Secondly, "the public" rushing Sega is not sourced or mentioned anywhere, and articles aren't supposed to have little notes like "(See reception)" either.
• Sonic 2K6 (a parody of some 2K games), and even Sonic Adventure 3
  • You need sources for such claims. I've never seen anyone call it that as a parody, or for those reasons.
• Today, the game is one of the least known games in the series;
  • Needs a source. Violates WP:OR as it is. Seems pretty well known to me, it's on current gen of video games systems, and I've seen it in many stores.
• however, Sega has been much more cautious with the series ever since...and Sonic shall not have such an influence with humans.
  • Needs a source. Violates WP:OR as it is.
• The reason for the relationship was for game's primary goal: to make Sonic interact with humans.
  • Needs a source. Violates WP:OR as it is.

• the only Sonic game on the Xbox 360 and/or PlayStation 3 being Sonic Free Riders.
  • This doesn't make any sense considering the existence of Sonic Generations.

Please stop re-adding this information, unless you can provide some sources for the claims I said needed sources. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 22:05, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Second warning; stop these sorts of edits. This edit has multiple issues, like your prior one, including lack of reliable sources, inserting original research, and general factual innaccuracies. (As you can see, Sonic Free Riders was only release for Xbox 360, so saying it's the only game for "both consoles" can't be right no matter what systems you were referring to. Please stop this. Sergecross73 msg me 00:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Third warning. Do not blindly revert without discussion, like you did here If this continues, you are likely to be blocked from editing. Again, please stop. Sergecross73 msg me 02:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

It's not a matter of "letting you finish", there are fundamental issues with virtually all of the information you're trying to add to Sonic the Hedgehog (2006 video game), as I've written on your talk page and my edit summaries. Please read WP:VERIFY - it's not a matter of the stuff "you know", you need to provide sources for this information when you add it, not sometime later. And this isn't addressing the fundamental errors in your information either. (Your Sonic Free Riders trivia isn't true in any respect, due to the existence of Sonic Generations being on for PS3 and 360, for instance.)

And who are you do declare this game a failure at an anniversary celebration, but to call Generations a success. You need sources, and criteria descriptions, (sales? reviews scores?) to make such statements. Please stop this. Sergecross73 msg me 03:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Your addition to List of FoxTrot characters has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Salvidrim! 17:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

• If you do not know how to cite your claims like this one I've reverted, at least insert just the url so another editor can fix it. Thanks, « ₣M₣ » 21:20, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

You Need Guidance

I seen through your list of Contributions and I am quite disappointed with your actions. This is NOT how Wikipedia works. In every single Page in Wikipedia, there should be at least 2 Source to help verify its notability, otherwise it can be a fraud. I strongly suggest you to clearly read WP:REFB and WP:FAKE, including every single detail that is necessary for you to create a proper Reference with a trusted Source. I assure you that they will make your Contribution a Success, but you need to gain the agreement of the majority first once you have your Reference ready.--Bumblezellio (talk) 12:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Recent edit

I have reverted one of your recent edits to Stan Lee because I believe it contained trivial information. Please be aware that Wikipedia is selective about its content. A page about Stan Lee should avoid too much detail about the works he was in: for instance, you can briefly describe Lee's role in X-Men but you shouldn't explain the storyline for X-Men: that's why there's a link to the film in the article for Stan Lee. I think that the quotes and excessive descriptions you were adding did not belong in the article.

Thank you for trying to contribute to Wikipedia; if you have any questions or issues please visit my talk page. Bilorv ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 08:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The New 52, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Earth 2. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Star Wars books, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star Wars: The Clone Wars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Naruto characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prodigy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death Note, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryuk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jon Krakauer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Kelly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 5) page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angela (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolverine (comics). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of anime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Boondocks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yu Yu Hakusho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Misuse of sources

I've made a general comment on the talk page for the article however as this really concerns you I am writing to you directly.

Please stop adding information to articles (in this case My Hero Academia) either without a source, or by using false sources that do not include the information you are adding. Perhaps this was an honest mistake and you simply assumed the cast members were listed in the article like the others. However I've had to remove several cast members who weren't in the source you added so either you need to check your facts and source before adding them or you need to consider the issues it causes to add sources that do not support information. Information that isn't properly sourced isn't worth having as it does not help the article, if anything it casts doubts over the rest of the text. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt in this case, however any further additions that use incorrect sources may result in referral to admins.SephyTheThird (talk) 17:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Code Geass characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laura Bailey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mumbai0618. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess edit

I'm sorry, but I had to undo your edit to The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess because it's not from a neutral point of view. Many, including me, can tell you that there a few things wrong with the game, though I do agree that it is one of the best in the series. After having played the Wii version, I had to get the Wii U version and that Wolf Link amiibo! Anyway, I do apologize about having to undo your edit. If you have any questions, I suggest you stop by the Teahouse, a place for our less-experienced users to ask as many questions as they like about how to edit Wikipedia. — Gestrid (talk) 03:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Norm of the North. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 18:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of One Piece characters page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ryan Coogler, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 23:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Captain America (vol. 5). SummerPhD^v2.0 04:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mumbai0618. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ocean's 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soft reboot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to Fate/stay night, but please remember that Wikipedia isn't a place for walkthroughs, cheats, lists of game content or detailed instructions on how to play a game. For more information please read the video game guideline. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 18:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Summer Wars plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC).

Claims of having a cult following

Hi. I saw you added a claim that a film has a cult following in this edit. This sort of claim requires a citation to a reliable source. Otherwise, fans will add these kinds of claims to every film on Wikipedia. WikiProject Film maintains a list of vetted resources that may be useful in finding a citation. Let me know if you have trouble, and I may be able to help. But please don't add unsourced claims of cult followings – it's like saying, "My friends and I like this film," and that doesn't really help readers. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mumbai0618. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on Van Wilder, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Again, there is absolutely nothing in this article to indicate this film has a "cult" following. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:57, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited What's Eating Gilbert Grape, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hydrophobia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Mumbai0618,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Mumbai0618,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Mumbai0618,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

April 2020

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Please preview, consolidate, and summarize

Hello- Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 01:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derek Cianfrance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Valentine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Hunchback of Notre Dame (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kid Icarus: Uprising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hive mind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Back to the Future Part II. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Back to the Future Part II, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please note that the cited article says Altuve was responding to the scandal allegations but doesn’t say he was talking about wearing a wire. Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

If you are referring to the 2019 interview from The New York Times, please note that I am not the one who added that article. I am happy to remove that portion, as I did with all other mentions of wires, but do not accuse me of poor sourcing. The only sources I added were for the evidence on signstealingscandal.com and Correa's interview with Rosenthal. Mumbai0618 (talk) 17:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm so sorry for misreading this. You moved the unattributed mention of the wire that I was referring to, but it's clear that you did't add it originally (or remove it). I took care of it now. Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

It's all good. Glad we could clear that up. Mumbai0618 (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Are we thinking that signstealingscandal.com, a site created by a web developer and Astros fan and apparently without editorial oversight, is a reliable source for BLP material? Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

The website is used on many pages, including the Houston Astros sign stealing scandal's main page, and the article sourced on Altuve's page is from the Wall Street Journal, so it appears reliable enough. Mumbai0618 (talk) 18:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

But surely you know that frequency of use isn't one of the criteria for determining whether a source is reliable. In other words, if I were to take an unreliable source and spread it across WP articles, that wouldn't move it an inch closer to being reliable. Larry Hockett (Talk) 18:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Feel free to change it if you want, I'm not going to stop you. Though in advance, I'd recommend not removing it from the scandal's page due to it being under the "Public Reactions" section, where it is appropriately placed. Mumbai0618 (talk) 18:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Regarding its use on the main scandal page, it seems like the Adams site would be an okay source for the existence of the Adams site (but it makes me wonder why we don't just use an actual RS that discusses the site). I don't see how the Adams site is a reliable source for third party information about living people (Farquhar and Gattis). I note that WP:SPS says never (in bold) to use self-published sources this way. I appreciate your good faith recommendation to me, but I think it reflects some misunderstandings of appropriate sourcing. Larry Hockett (Talk) 18:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at It (2017 film). Sundayclose (talk) 16:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kuroko's Basketball, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 18:37, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (2013 film), you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 00:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at X-Men (film series), you may be blocked from editing. — Manticore 04:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Hawkeye7. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kenneth Bainbridge, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Backyard Sports, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please also see WP:VGSCOPE Waxworker (talk) 20:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zom 100: Bucket List of the Dead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

MOS:CURLY

Please, read what the MOS says and stop using “curly” quotation marks. Xexerss (talk) 23:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CNN Films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Friedman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

About your edits to Spirited Away — final warning

These edits you made to the article violate multiple Wikipedia policies, including neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research. These are issues that other editors have been informing you of for years at this point. Consider this your final warning for adding content to articles without citing a reliable source; the next step up from here will have to be administrative intervention.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Persistent policy violations by Mumbai0618. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Sourcing

Thank you for providing a source when you repeated your edit at Ocean Waves (film)! Please, from now on, always provide a source; it's one of our basic principles that readers should be able to verify everything (and read more if they want to). Although the name of the site didn't look reliable, it turned out to be a reasonable article. However, it was dated December 25, 2022, so can't be used to say that there's still no English dub "As of 2024", so I checked; and it looks as though there is indeed an English dub available (and not just the fan-produced one on YouTube). So I reverted your edit again. Can you find a review or a press release saying when it was released? (Not somebody's LinkedIn or a Reddit or other forum post please: guidelines for acceptable sources. If you can, that would make a great addition to the article. (Courtesy ping to TechnoSquirrel69, whose AN/I report took me to the article.) Yngvadottir (talk) 00:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. As for the source, while I acknowledge the date, I believe the link you have provided may be wrong as well. The date listed by GKIDS is for 2017, five years earlier than my source. However, if you click on any of the links for the DVD or streaming releases, the former only lists Japanese, while the latter redirects to the film on Max, which is only Japanese. On top of that, I cannot find any other evidence to suggest a dub was ever produced, including on Anime News Network. In the past, some anime sites have incorrectly listed an English dub when none exists; for example, last year Aniplex showed a Blu-Ray release for Rascal Does Not Dream with a dub, only to later come out in a press release that this was inaccurate and that no dub for the show exists (the dubs of the second and third movies had not yet been announced). I’m willing to discuss this further, but I am certain the lack of a dub is accurate. Is it possible for me to revert the edit, but with 2022 instead of 2024? Mumbai0618 (talk) 00:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 20:09, 16 August 2024 (UTC)