After some repair work to the Lourdes page I was invited to register by user:Sefringle, see http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:69.253.102.193

so my trackrecord includes all past entries made with that IP address and those made recently with http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:Contributions/71.230.249.175 such as 6 June 2007 expansion to Nicholas of Flüe of prayer from CCC, and addition of "On the debasement of money" to Juan de Mariana the Spanish School of Salamanca scholastic

I am happy to discuss my Wikipediantics (its a hobby, a weakness I indulge, I hope I'm not too pedantic) MrsKrishan 22:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC). A favorite pastime is casual curiousity regarding Slavic etymologies rooted in archaic protoindoEuropean tongues, in particular that of my husband's patrilinear heritage in Romania.Reply

  • enhanced Kur page to hotlink to online copy of Samuel Noah Kramer's "Sumerian Mythology" [1944, 1961] expounding on the mythical Kur, the first ever dragon,associated with the Zagros mountains to the east of Sumer. The cuneiform for "kur" was written ideographically with the cuneiform sign 𒆳, a pictograph of a mountain.
The Sumerians were a non-Semitic, non-Indo-European people who lived in southern Babylonia from 4000-3000 B.C.E. They invented cunieform writing, and their spiritual beliefs influenced all successive Near Eastern religions, including Judaism, Christianity and Islam. They produced an extensive body of literature, among the oldest in the world. Samuel Noah Kramer spent most of his life studying this literature, by piecing together clay tablets in far-flung museums. This short work gives translations or summaries of the most important Sumerian myths.


Miscellaneous minor edits

edit

Pashmak - Persian and Dragon's Beard Candy- Chinese variants of torus hand-pulled toffee

  • cross referenced article at Catholic Encyclopedia on the poem Salve Mundi Salutare [1] upon which the musical oratorio Membra Jesu Nostri is based at:
- Passion cantata#Latin
- Five Holy Wounds#Settings in Sacred Music
  • appended link to BBC Religion & Ethics photo gallery In pictures » Fr. Alexander Men: Russian Orthodox priest of fearless faith under Alexander_Men#External_links and updated broken link for English version of the Open Orthodox University he founded
  • corrected Catullus' poem8 link at Choliamb to point to the linear translation of example of halting iambic
  • corrected typo "geniticist" (re: father-in-law's profession) and added two video-clip links (BBC Business; Vimeo C+L's NY Encounter 2011) re: GE VP CEO wife Clara for Herve_Gaymard
  • corrected broken link under Name_day#Italy for it:onomastico added cake info and refs to images of torta and etymology (Greek: ονομαστική εορτή, onomastikē eortē, or γιορτή, yiortí, "feast") and coined a new favorite onomatopoeic expression for deliciousness: 𝔂𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓲 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓲 Tanti auguri a te !!
  • updated with BBC Who do you think you are? episode at Eva_von_Sacher-Masoch#Life_and_career and linked to Leopold_von_Sacher-Masoch#Later_years masochism's namesake
  • referenced two historic ethnographic photographs, posted under Ukpuru blog at Brass Anklets image on Igbo people#Culture and Igbo Culture main page
  • linked to Chowmahalla Palace and Falaknuma Palace under last Hyderabad Nizam Mukarram Jah
  • added Louvre appreciation page for Canova statue to Psyche Revived by Cupid's Kiss
  • added cherub and butterfly Eros and Psyche high-relief plaster medallion to gallery under Cupid and Psyche#Sculpture and inserted explanatory sentence to relevant superceding paragraph.
-English translation of IEC Catechesis “The Eucharist: Gift from God for the life of the world” (2009) (given in Spanish), 49th International Eucharistic Congress, Quebec, Canada
for German page on de:Heinrich_Pfeiffer_(Kunsthistoriker)
Sudarium Christi The Face of Christ] online audio visual featuring texts by sudarium expert Sr. Blandina Paschalis Schlömer et al.
The Rediscovered Face - 1 first of four installments of an audiovisual presentation relating the holy image with a number of ancient predecessors, YouTube, access date March 2013.

creating back-linkage cross references where applicable

  • Fixed Salve caput cruentatum broken link - missing /a/ subdirectory in URL domain source string for Cyber hymnal listing and cross references addressing the various members of the cruficied body at Buxtehude's Membra Jesu Nostri
* the feet * the kness * the hands * the pierced side * the breast * the heart * the face
- NOTE to self: 5-yr tag in need of remediation at Marian and Holy Trinity Columns 

"article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2007) "
(Lent 1858 commenced February 17th with Ash Wednesday and concluded in Holy Week: 28 March Palm Sunday thru the Triduum of Maundy Thursday, 1 April and Good Friday, 2 April culminating on Easter Sunday, 4 April 1858)
NOTE to self: Pope John Paul II died Saturday 2 April 2005, on the eve of the Feast of Divine Mercy in a year when Good Friday fell on March 25 (Annunciation) and Ash Wednesday was 9 February.
the day after feast of [St. Scholastica] (10 February) the sister of [St. Benedict]
also added L'Angelo della Vita or The angel of life (1894) online image of London's National Gallery exhibit
also added The Punishment of Lust at Walker Art Gallery Liverpool
German Exhibition "Bernwards Schätze" (Bernward's Treasures) online Hannoverische Allgemeine photo gallery to St Michaels abbey and St Bernward pages also
CORRECTED: October 2012
edit
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Kateri Tekakwitha, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 16:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
okie dokie I stand corrected MrsKrishan (talk) 18:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
- note to self: add assorted items under krambambuli 
- note to self: need to create a page for Margaret Rope the Catholic convert (Carmelite) artist of this image 
  • Cerastoderma edule - link to Cardial Ware
  • corrected typo in Don Quixote citation under wiktionary entry French verbs'acharner
  • Paul_Claudel#External_links - repaired broken link to Walled in Light poem hosted in English translation at Ty Mam Dyw convent, Wales
  • Philippe Berthelot (en Francaise) - linked en.wiki page on bail-out scandal Banque Industrielle de Chine on fr.wiki page for Claudel's disgraced mentor in the diplomatic service
  • Henry Ossawa Tanner - updated chronological list of exhibits to cover the major new PAFA retrospective travelling to Cincinnati and Houston.
  • Broken windows (20th C social theory vs 19th C economic theory) - since they are both categories of Austrian school approach to social justice, added a cross reference to Bastiat's fallacy of the broken window to page on broken windows theory of James Q. Wilson.

re: Ford Madox Ford hermeneutic

edit
  • Added hotlink at Norns image caption on File:Die Nornen (1889) by Johannes Gehrts.jpg to Johannes Gehrts page (illustrator of Therese (von Droste-Hülshoff) Dahn fairytale book, niece of Anna vDH) and the wikimedia image page - need to add wikimedia category to his page also
- note to self: translate http://de.wiki.x.io/wiki/Erbm%C3%A4nner (and friar Droste-Hulshoff too) 
- Groby#Groby in art and culture reference to Joan of Arc and Domremy in novel 4
- Groby Castle#Feudal Groby in art and culture citing novel 3 underneath reference to BBC TimeTeam dig
- Groby Old Hall#Groby Hall in art and culture citing novel 3 wartime banter of enlisted man from North Ridings
- John Grey of Groby#Ancestry in fiction citing novel 3
CORRECTED: Disambiguation Henry VII and Domremy
edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, many thanksMrsKrishan (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


On Judeo-christian communio personarum

edit

Miscellaneous edits on virtue, meaning and prior civilizations:

  • updated English page for French Rabbi to reflect Catholic interest after quoted by Pope in public address to Curia using material from French language page
Hi, thanks for your work on Gilles Bernheim here:[2]. Regards, Springnuts (talk) 21:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
You're most welcome MrsKrishan (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hebrew sacred calligraphy

edit

Re: Jonah and the Gourd vine

edit

added multiple cross-references to sacred and profane emblematic tropes at

I requested User:JohnBot improve on corrections with some wikifying refs or external sources.

Theology of the Body & perichoresis

edit
disambiguation notice Disambiguation link notification for February 17It's OK to remove this message. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC) noted and correctedReply
expansion of topic challenged, see User talk:MrsKrishan#Perichoresis below
added visuals to accompany expanded intro para re: biblical typology and liturgical calendar mirroring pastoral seasons of Jewish temple worship.
[File:LOC SHS.jpg LOC SHS.jpg] The Speculum humane salvationis contains illustrations of related scenes from the Old and New Testament, Library of Congress
[File:Pfister_Biblia_Pauperum_.jpg Pfister_Biblia_Pauperum_.jpg] Left: the reverence Moses showed before the buring bush on Mt. Sinai is equated with the adoration of the Shepherds and the priest celebrating the sacrifice of the Mass
Perichoresis
Catholic social teaching
Catholic theology of the body

and expanded Liturgical worship to include

Eastern Rite (Syriac Qurbana)
Western Rite
Canon of the Mass
Eucharistic Prayers
Second Vatican Counci changes
Gallery split undone >> edit conflict
Summary "delete" undone >> edit conflict

Lack of coherent voice to article or image choices ("history of art" topic deserves own focus page) Symbolism in material forms of worship aids lacking discussion under Art. See Perichoresis

Golden Gate

edit
inserted image and history-of-art meme from Joachim and Anne Meeting at the Golden Gate, and associated themes in writing of Pope John Paull II, see also Madonna of the Gate of Dawn and Metterza >> see disambiguation >> Anna Selbdritt below

Syriac

edit
  • added reference to illuminated manuscript known as the Syriac Bible of Paris (Bishop of Siirt's library) to Siirt page (was Byzantine Galicia now Turkey)
  • added Liturgical Worship category (Syriac Qurbana) in bulleted list (@ Eucharist "see also" above)
Liturgical renewal after VII
edit
Liturgy of St James
edit

In the Liturgy of St James article you wrote, "In those communities that worship in Syriac the neumes are mirror images of those used by the authocthonous Greek and Cyrillic Orthodox Churches and written and read right to left in accord with the Arabic script of the prayer texts."

Did you mean Arabic or Aramaic? Aramaic (Syriac) is also read right to left, and is the language used in prayer, I think.

Eric Kvaalen (talk) 16:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Let All Mortal Flesh Keep Silence, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.cyberhymnal.org/htm/l/e/letallmf.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:46, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Reply

NOTE to self: five years later, additions not deleted. I rest my case, tag removed Usertalk:Coren. MrsKrishan (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
re: Speedy deletion of Gerard Moultrie
edit

A tag has been placed on Gerard Moultrie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. mboverload@ 21:51, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Reply

NOTE to self: five years later, page not speedily deleted? I rest my case, tag (and warning indicated above) deleted. MrsKrishan (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


re: Devotion to Holy_Face_of_Jesus

edit
- note  to self: work to remove ((Multiple issues|npov|primarysources|tone|Too few opinions|)) notices 
under SSS Congregation of the Blessed Sacrament and update Servants of the Blessed Sacrament Fremch sisters Eucharistic adoration, 1858 by St. Peter Julian Eymard, approved by Pope Pius IX in 1871. History of art re: devotion to starting in 1844 in Tours by Sister Marie of St Peter, was promoted by Leo Dupont and was approved by Pope Leo XIII in 1885. Link to Rodin's biography and scope of magnum opus Gates of Hell / Paul Claudel / Philadelphia Rodin Museum inauguration
-  2/13/13 Feast of Holy Face - penitential practices for election of 266th  Pope   
1958 Pope Pius XII formally declared the Feast of the Holy Face of Jesus as Shrove Tuesday (the Tuesday before Ash Wednesday) for all Roman Catholics
- create page for The Face PBS Voyager film for TV

Re: Immaculate Conception dogma prefigured in Anna selbdritt

edit

Expanded entry using related Matterza content on Italian page on the relationship of St. Anne to the Immaculate Conception of her daughter. Added segments for

Added photo of St Anne reliquary to


Re: Dualism inferior to Trinitarian hope

edit

Added references to Renaissance emblematic tropes, virtue and vice understood in the economy of salvation

Will research image to support as requested under WikiProject:Saints on [Talk] page.
- note to self: add images on Ru Fl De pages (mondsickel) to Woman of the Apocalypse in English


Re: Eastern vs Western treatments of Mary's girdle/mantle

edit
 
Solomon's knot carving in Almenno San Bartolomeo (Italy) symbol of order under the law of right reason, akin to the onomastico Shalom of Solomon himself
  • Added a cross-reference to the tradition of St. Thomas receiving the mantle at the Assumption to the page for baroque Bavarian Mary Untier of Knots image. Added cross-references to pages for pages for Intercession Pokrov/cincture and Virgin of Mercy/mater misericordia.

Dénouement

edit
  • Added text linking popularity to resolution in real life dramas at Dramatic Structure page.

CORRECTED: Disambiguation

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Mary Untier of Knots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assumption (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Reply

  • translated from German History and reinstated "undone" material - as noted on Talk page

Aggressive User:Bmclaughlin9 abusing 3-revert rule

edit

Reinstated "undone" material - as noted on Talk page - repeatedly removed, and new expanded encyclopedic material, registered complaint with Bbb23 User_talk:Bbb23

Spanish Civil War

edit

Appended a pertinent list to the See also subsection bulleted list camouflaged to protect from vandalism (redacted off the entry)

  • List of non-participants who died defending their freedom of conscience

links to Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War page.


article for deletion Sandra Fluke

edit
  • The last-archived record is missing my vote to "Keep," in particular to my additions under subheading "Positive Law vs Natural Law" that were repeatedly redacted out (vandalism).

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FSandra_Fluke&diff=481101940&oldid=480094119 "− *Keep. It is indeed encyclopedic.Natural Law vs Positive Law section is relevant and worthy of expansion, complementary to the Biography section as redacted. Balanced perspective on a personage with religion tag: Roman Catholic deserves linkage to the appropriate contested terminology found elsewhere in Wiki. Also recommend securing against repeat vandalism of this section by User:Robofish MrsKrishan (talk) 04:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)"Reply

Your edits to this article were reverted as they violated Wikipedia's policies on WP:No original research and WP:Biographies of living persons. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought: it should not contain critical commentaries and opinions except those that are referenced to reliable sources. And in particular, biographical articles about living people must not contain unsourced criticism. I recommend you familiarise yourself with our policies before making further edits to this article. Robofish (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

seconded. please read the articles on the core content policies especially verifiability and no original research as your editions are disruptive. Paintedxbird (talk) 05:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Rush Limbaugh–Sandra Fluke controversy. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. AV3000 (talk) 00:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Rush Limbaugh–Sandra Fluke controversy with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ISTB351 (talk) 00:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


Edit warring notice

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Rush Limbaugh–Sandra Fluke controversy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. AV3000 (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rush Limbaugh–Sandra Fluke controversy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ISTB351 (talk) 00:53, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

RESPONSE I am not attacking anyone, My BOLD edit is under attack, and I am defending the rationale behind it see Wikipedia:BRD-NOT"BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes. Don't invoke BRD as your reason for reverting someone else's work or for edit warring: instead, provide a reason that is based on policies, guidelines, or common sense." and Do not accept "Policy" , "consensus", or "procedure" as valid reasons for a revert: and
PRESERVE it is best for the project as a whole if we concentrate our energies on improving articles rather than debating our personal ideas and beliefs
I am seeking assistance from Conservative portal contributor Uncle Ed MrsKrishan (talk) 01:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
MrsKrishan you have been pointed to wikipedia guidelines and core content policies before and have ignored the hints. don't add original research and unsourced claims in controversial pages as that is tendentious editing. Paintedxbird (talk) 05:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Another one...

edit

  Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You once again throw the word "vandalism" around where it's unwarranted. Stop it. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Subsequent to my appealing to a senior editor re:NPOV (see new notice appended to top of article --> it would now appear I have grounds for considering my POV adds balance even if other editors do not consider a so-called 'unattributed' or biased personal POV either licit or valid). I will not cease or desist noting occasions of vandalism as objective events of rash deletion of BLD contributed content necessitate. See multiple comments tagged User:MrsKrishan for (here redundant as already typed elsewhere) arguments of relevance to Ms Fluke's own use of the term cura animarum.MrsKrishan (talk) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rush Limbaugh/Sandra Fluke controversy discussion

edit

Your words are very kind. I hope that we can all improve the article by reaching a understanding about the matter. --Gardimuer (talk) 00:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

CORRECTED: Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you p~~osted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you "Not a person/ Robot" for the tip - I lapsed a couple of times on the [| Talk page for "Rush Limbaugh / Sandra Fluke controversy"]MrsKrishan (talk) 00:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Vice

edit

Wikified use of vicious in opening para, to link to page on Vice to establish relevance to references I made to Dante etc. in my BLD contribution, improving upon balance re: NPOV. For the record current tally of content additions since vandalised:

79. ^ "Georgetown Professor Dept. of Government James V. Schall S.J.: "On 'things not subject to human government'"". Retrieved 11 March 2012.
http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Blog/1152/on_things_not_subject_to_human_government.aspx
80. ^ "Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologica “Treatise on Law” Article 4 of the 93d Question". Retrieved 11 March 2012.(in English translation by Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Benziger Bros. (1947), converted to HTML Sun Jan 11 07:47:02 1998)
http://www.ccel.org/a/aquinas/summa/FS/FS093.html#FSQ93A4THEP1
81.^ ""Bishops Renew Call to Legislative Action on Religious Liberty"". Retrieved 11 March 2012.
http://usccb.org/news/2012/12-026.cfm


Joined WikiProject Catholicism @ member 390

edit

Will seek support for expanding the stakeholders re: natural law arguments at root of the Limbaugh-Fluke (HHS controversy) and expand on same at new Contraceptive mandates entry

Perichoresis

edit

I am working on this article which in my opinion has multiple problems and will be tagged as such. One of them affects you in that you have made substantial contributions to sections which seem to be off topic: most of the Etymology section has little of nothing to do with etymology; the section Human body as icon of the communio personarum is really a separate article which goes far beyond perichoresis. (It may even be two articles.) Jpacobb (talk) 17:51, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Happy to discuss your impression of article's structure (Etymology subordinated under Usage in new nesting, and my expansion into of further trinitarian aspects of personhood), see my comments under User talk:Jpacobb#Perichoresis TOC changes and Talk:Perichoresis#Multiple problems MrsKrishan (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Perichoresis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pope Francis

edit

I agree with the deletion of most of material you added about the Pallottine martyrs.

I took your original material, which had a lot that told us nothing about Francis, and put some of it in a note and moved it to what I believe is the appropriate location. Promoting the beatification process is what Francis has done. Your information really wasn't about his relationship with the government.

Disagree on what is meant by "relationship" - you seem to wish to reduce it to temporal secular POV, a ludicrous proposition since the man is ordained to holy orders so he's not merely a politician or NGO activist, he's concerned with eternal permanent values such as beauty, goodness and preeminently, the truth which unites in peaceful trust or lack thereof which sows discord that can lead down the path to the sort of coercion and violence perpetrated by govt authorities on the Argentine people.MrsKrishan (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

You then added even more material that has nothing to do with Francis, which has since been deleted as not relevant to Francis. The Pope Francis entry is a biography and we have to be careful how much we include that isn't about him.

Cowardly use of passive voice "has been deleted" doesn't absolve you of having an opinion on the relevance of spiritual material to a spiritual man and who gets to decide the merits of same. Let's seek consensus here on that topic first: is martyrdom a relevant topic or not? Then, perhaps discuss "Is it relevant that the man who now holds the keys to five matrydoms was present, participated in the events surrounding their sacrificial deaths and promoted their cause?" I think YES and YES perhaps you do not?MrsKrishan (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I added some information on San Patricio Church massacre and a little on Pallottines. Perhaps you can add info there. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 17:27, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm rather befuddled by this focus on 'material facts' that supposedly must be "telling us something about Francis" as if events in his life were just political or historical coincidences, when quite obviously they are not, they are of immense spiritual value, a POV that belongs in an article on a spirital personage elevated to the highest office (in a Catholic understanding, which I can't assume (talk) or (talk) shares, Pope Francis has the power of the keys, to elevate these murder victims to saints or lock them out as one of a number of usual victims of the tyranny of relativism/dictatorship of ideology such as aborted babies etc.). Will attempt a third undo/modification, then may have to seek WP:DRN to open up the parsing of what "value" means to other religiously-minded editorsMrsKrishan (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Added Beagle island dispute material to back-up POV on validity of "religious-mindedness" in disputed content elsewhere in article (see above).MrsKrishan (talk) 19:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2013

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Pope Francis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. DeCausa (talk) 18:56, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. DeCausa (talk) 08:32, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

begging your indulgence, but under "Cardinal" addition of the 2005 Chicago Tribune 'ref' tag has a typo: Bergoglio is spelled with an "r" ( since you blocked me you'll have to correct it yourself)MrsKrishan (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Pope Francis. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sunday is a day of rest, so offering up the block set to expire: 16:12, 24 March 2013 for Pope's intentions Praying for all wikipedia editors. Eager to add WSJ article on Pope's attitude to an active laity, see Kakure_Kirishitan under Pope Francis#Creative transformation in evangelization and A Japanese Lesson (About China for the Pope Beijing fears Catholicism because of the universality of its teachings.)MrsKrishan (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Footnote re: ⎇ (key lock symbol used in my block appeal below) Forgive the pun, no disrespect intented, Catholic doctrine teaches that the Holy Spirit confrims who will holds the keys. As in chess, a King's ♔ might outranks a Bishop's ♝ right, but that doesn't reduce him to a powerless pawn ♙ either. Can we agree we use symbols because they communicate meaning? E.g.
  • labor ⚒
  • liberty of the sea ⚓
  • military force ⚔
  • jurisprudence ⚖
  • gender ⚤
Awaiting Admin. Trust the processMrsKrishan (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock|1= Understand re:3 revert rule, query as to definition of when "revert"s start counting as reverts? Removal of new material IMHO is also a 'revert' and prevents development of subject on topic (see Chicago Tribune 'ref' under Cardinal, towit I apply this quote in my defence: "The decision by Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio carries political as well as spiritual significance.") >> 3 Relations with Argentine governments >> 3.1 Dirty War. KEY⎇ significance here is Fr. Bergoglio's relationship to Fr. Kelly (for info on spiritual direction, see my comments at Talk:Pope_Francis#Relevant_Information_Deleted._Why.3F.3F.3F }}

This block has expired. Kuru (talk) 22:56, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Despite all the pretty symbols (no sarcasm intended), I'm having trouble following your unblock request. I'll respond to the only thing I think I understand: removing new material from an article, unless it's exempted, counts as a revert.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Icon corner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krasna (..del..) Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Linking to the disambiguation page was intentional and should remain, to indicate the root meaning associated with placenames in slavic languages. Thx. MrsKrishan (talk) 23:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Igbo culture may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • sitting wearing anklets - Thomas Whitridge Northcote (pre 1913) |accessdate=2013-09-29}}</ref> ]]]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 13:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salim, Nablus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genesis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chernivtsi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castelnau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thx, affirm disambiguation page linking to whole range of related terms known as Castelnau is intentional. In making an etymological link across language families no drilling down to a specific, narrower toponym or onomastico is necessary MrsKrishan (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tittle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syriac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thx corrected to specifically Syriac language with hyperlink text minus 'language' as redundant in context

June 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arcadia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ' the online Classics portal hosted by Tufts University</ref>derived from her the surname Sinoeis (perhaps whence also the Pontic lagoon [[Lake Sinoe]] "nautical blue" [[sinine#Etymology|Estonian]]/[
  • Estonian]]/[wikt:sini#Etymology_1|Finnish]/Karelian/Votic *sini, from an Indo-Iranian language (cognates Kurdish şîn, Persian خشین ‎(xašin) “blue”, Russian синий ‎(sinij), and Macedonian сина ‎(

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Appreciate your noticing -- I have corrected missing brackets and tidied up other formatting incongrueties - Thanks MrsKrishan (talk) 01:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edits to [Derzalas]

edit

After reading a

tag appended by User:Ogress, I continued to refine and expand the contribution I was in the process of making, adding an entry to the talk page explaining my reasoning. Shortly thereafter, a wholesale revert by User:Ogress (-13,437)‎ for Uncited, WP:FRINGE, bad cites. (TW) scrubbed all new material for no good reason. Opened discussion re: advisability for factual feasibility on both topic- and moderator- talk pages, awaiting reply MrsKrishan (talk) 08:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

I think I agree with Ogress that there were too many problems with the material you added to be allowed to stand. Most of it was unsourced and seemed highly speculative. Especially the etymological information seemed problematic to me. I think if you want to add parts of it back, you should make sure only to add parts that can be sourced to good sources. Note that the entire information needs to be sourced, it is not enough to source parts of it and then let the reader make the connection - that is in conflict with our policies on synthesis.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 07:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for tips, further discussion under User_talk:Maunus#Problem_editor MrsKrishan (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
On my page, you wrote: "The linguistic connections are no mere tenuous supposition on my part: Edessa in Syria is derived from Odessa in Macedonia, Perso-Hellenized cultic practices replacing more ancient Semitic cults associated with Abrahamic montheism in Muslim tradition, see present day Sanliurfa. I appreciate you making time for discussion and working to keep Wikipedia the great resource for advancing human understanding and promoting peace."
First, Odessa was founded in 1794, Ἔδεσσα is an Ancient Greek name dating back to classical antiquity. What do you mean "Edessa in Syria is derived from Odessa in Macedonia"? This is exactly the kind of statement that makes me feel like you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Ogress 22:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, MrsKrishan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Institute of the Incarnate Word "Disputed article" Assistance Request

edit

My comments: see updated sources cited under News on [Talk page] including Argentine press conference making first public acknowledgment of Father Buela's moral and governance failings. Will contribute a new subsegment to "Controversies" as and when necessary, should other frequent contributors such as User:Jordi be unable to assert themselves against censorship by vested interests, taking a 12-day break to celebrate the Incarnate Word's birthday on Christmas MrsKrishan (talk) 07:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016

edit

  Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Institute of the Incarnate Word. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

created English version of Our Lady of the Rosary of San Nicolás

edit

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, MrsKrishan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, MrsKrishan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply