Mrox2

Welcome to my talk page

• Rude and egoistic / narcissists are not allowed.

Nomination of Ty Brenneman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ty Brenneman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ty Brenneman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ty Brenneman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Model and Modeling. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ek Hasina Thi (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flashback. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

List of game engines

I did not revert you as vandalism or unconstructive. Please re-read my edit notes. Entries on the list need to be notable (I.e. have their own enwiki article), with sources. This engine does not, and other Wikipedia projects can not be used as a source. -- ferret (talk) 22:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Deluded, it is a real game, a real engine, it exists. I don't have to prove it when there is enough material out there. (Has its own EN Wiki Article) Many links here link to dead pages, go ahead and remove all of these then. I think you are just acting up and doing it for rank, like everyone else. --Mrox2 (talk) 09:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Please read about notability and verifiability. The burden is on you to provide reliable sources to support your edit. Other Wikis are not considered reliable sources. If you believe there are enough sources for this engine to have an article, feel free to start the article at WangReal Engine (with sources, or someone will probably delete it). Once the article is established, it can be added to the list of game engines. -- ferret (talk) 19:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ahlam page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mrox2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mrox2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mrox2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Bahrain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mrox2! Your additions to Huwala people have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 13:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ajam of Bahrain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Azeri and Muslim conquests.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Arabic Wikipedia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Arabic Wikipedia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Arabic Wikipedia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Arabic Wikipedia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Achomi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azeri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Demographics of Bahrain. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arabs. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 17:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

It wasn't fitting for you to begin a discussion about something that is clearly going to be controversial, then almost immediately change the article to the way you want it to be anyway. In particular, changing the lead so it no longer reflected the title of the article was inappropriate. Largoplazo (talk) 18:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure what's considered "controversial" here. The issue is about accuracy and representation, not controversy. It's misleading to group individuals of distinct ethnic, cultural, and historical backgrounds—whether Caucasian, Anatolian, Iranian, Indo-European, or North African—under a singular "Arab" label. Genetic and historical research clearly shows the diversity of these populations.

Moreover, attributing the contributions of scholars like Khwarizmi and Razi to Arab culture is factually incorrect. Both of these figures were of Persian origin, and though they contributed to science in the Arabic language, they did not identify as Arab. Ensuring that articles reflect these facts is not about imposing personal views, but about correcting inaccuracies. Wikipedia should prioritize verifiable historical truth, not broad and misleading generalizations. Mrox2 (talk) 18:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

If the article, worked on by a large number of people over a long period of time, in collaboration that has included discussions of this matter on this talk page, reads as it does, then you can assume that a statement by you that amounts to "You're all wrong, were going to go by my perspective on this" would be controversial, that is, it isn't going to meet with instantaneous mass agreement. Largoplazo (talk) 02:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

This issue seems to be about politics, not historical accuracy. Just like "Persians" don't technically exist as a unified label today (as they're referred to as "Farsi speakers" in Farsi Wikipedia), the term "Arabs" is often used as a blanket label. However, many of the so-called "Arab" populations are made up of diverse peoples with distinct identities—there are various Iranian peoples, North Africans, Levantines, and others who are unrelated genetically, historically, and culturally.

In fact, we don’t even share the same traditions, food, or even dialects; there are unique distinctions across the region. Just because a large number of people adopt or agree on a term doesn't make it historically or culturally accurate. That kind of broad generalization is known as a fallacy of consensus. Mrox2 (talk) 09:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

It has nothing to do with a fallacy of consensus because I wasn't talking about what's wrong and what's right, I was talking about it being controversial in that there is substantial disagreement. In other words, it doesn't matter that you think you're right, or whether you are right. What matters is that others obviously disagree and you can't just decree the correctness of your point of view and overrule everybody else. If the rule was that whoever insists they're right gets to have the article the way they see fit, then we'd have never-ending edit warring. Hashing these things out is why Wikipedia has talk pages. Largoplazo (talk) 13:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 'Ajam of Kuwait, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baluchi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ajam of Bahrain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

		The Anti-Systemic Bias Barnstar
		Your edits are greatly beneficial in helping to reduce systemic bias on Wikipedia. In particular, your efforts to accurately represent different ethnic groups and religions throughout the Middle East are commendable. By continuing to highlight diverse perspectives, you play an important role in fostering a richer understanding of this complex region. TahaKahi (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Bahrain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Ajam of Bahrain into History of Bahrain. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)