Welcome!

edit
Hello, MrRight2020! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- Deepfriedokra 10:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

-- Deepfriedokra 10:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra 10:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

MrRight2020, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi MrRight2020! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
edit
 

Hello MrRight2020. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MrRight2020. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MrRight2020|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. El_C 18:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, you are mistaken. I am not getting paid for anything. Just a new wiki user. Always WP:assume good faith. MrRight2020 (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2020 (UTC) MrRight2020 (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

(giggles) Sorry, dude. We are trying, but that's what the last really horrid one said. I must say, though, you are much more pleasant than that person was. It is appreciated. -- Deepfriedokra 21:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not sure if I should take the compliment when you are comparing me to a really horrid person? MrRight2020 (talk) 04:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's a straight compliment. You'll come to find I'm straight-forward and outspoken. And I appreciate the niceness.-- Deepfriedokra 04:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ditto my friend! MrRight2020 (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Dude. -- Deepfriedokra 13:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I don't get it. I've supported removing the negative content. And I've made it clear that the content needs balance. All I ask is what I ask in any article. Reliable sourcing, and disputes settled via consensus.-- Deepfriedokra 13:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've said it before and I'll say it again. That horrid section needs to go. Please pass that along to Mr Chahal or anyone else who might be interested.-- Deepfriedokra 14:15, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit