MrEskola

Welcome!

Hello, MrEskola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Midgrid(talk) 15:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Andrés Fernández Moreno

Hi there ESKOLA, VASCO here,

no my friend, you are wrong, Ricardo López Felipe is not injured. So far, we have four La Liga games, he was not selected for the first on a technical decision, the other three he was an unused substitute. Andrés IS first-choice OK? Asier Riesgo is the one injured, i don't doubt your good intentions, but leave my storyline be please. Also, yes, Ricardo is 39, but he'll be 40 during this season.

Attentively, happy week - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 14:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes, you're right at some parts. Then, I didn't thought that Asier was promoted as the first-choice, because Ricardo played in all La Liga fixtures during the last season. After my edit, I noticed that I was in wrong, but didn't re-edit it, because I forgot it in the late night.

I don't also doubt your positive intentions, but we both know that we're in Wikipedia, in a encyclopedia. That's why we must write only facts, not your 'storylines'. About Ricardo, I know, he will turn 40, but he is still 39 until 30 December. Andrés is second-choice goalkeeper and is playing, only because Asier is injured... and Asier is the first-choice, and probably will play when fit. --MrEskola (talk) 14:22, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

• I explained myself well and you still revert me? I admit that the words "my storyline" were not very well put. I have corrected Ricardo's age, but Andrés is first-choice as of now (you said we must write only facts - i have however merged your storyline with mine). More: how many games did Andrés played last year? 31 (ok in Segunda División). How many Riesgo? ZERO, who looks more like first-choice now (if José Luis Mendilibar changes his mind during the season, we'll write it, easy)? - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

So, where this is going to lead? If you get this: Andrés plays, because Asier (first-choice) is injured. Can you call Kuszczak as "first-choice", when he played few games as Edwin was injured? No. I hope you are willing to show your professionalism in your next message. If you still don't agree, I have only a one choice to choose from. --MrEskola (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

• I continue to be polite, also admitting the "my storyline" error, and you continue to be aggressive towards me ("if you continue, i have only one choice to choose from", "be more professional in your next message")? Of course, the Manchester United F.C. example is not relevant, van der Sar was #1 of course. What i mean is that for now Andrés is first-choice (i have corrected the storyline to meet your "demands"), and if he continues to perform well (he has, i have seen the match reports, the 0-8 against FC Barcelona was "expectable"), he will be the starter even when Riesgo recovers. I don't see what is the difficutly of seeing this.

I PROMISE to alter the storyline when/if Riesgo returns to first-choice status, i want to improve the quality of the articles as do you. Please note that, after discussing it with you, i have now written that Andrés "was signed as backup to Riesgo initially", i really don't know what more can i do to make you and i see eye to eye.

Attentively - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:23, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

• OK, i have rephrased Andrés' storyline even more, now all the mentions of him being first-choice are gone. I hope that suits you better. --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:46, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

I am delighted, that we were able to sort this problem out. Your changes look good for me, so thanks. --MrEskola (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Përparim Hetemaj

Hello. As I explained in my summary, we DO NOT use "born in Kosovo, Republic of Kosovo" or anything that points to such an idea. None of us, not me, not any editor. Perhaps you don't realise the implications of this because it is slightly remote from the nature of your core edits. To this end, I shall explain the procedure. All Kosovo-related matters, active or passive, are a sensitive issue on here and editors can find themselves blocked after just one warning. This is why I have reverted your edit and how you will find it to stand when you log in next. When an editor makes a mass edit which involves and amendment of birthplace information of any kind, it is automatically deemed to be in bad faith and the edits are subsequently reverted. All I could see was an amendment of birthplace details, a change in height with no explanation and a few changes but I failed to catch something that imporved the article even if your details were correct. With birthplace, we observe historical accuracy, place name and country name of individual at time of birth. For persons born in Kosovo before 17 February 2008, the country can be one of many: Serbia (2006-08), Sernia and Montenegro (2003-06), FR Yugoslavia (1992-03), SFR Yugoslavia (1963-92), FPR Yugoslavia (1946-63), Democratic Federal Yugoslavia (1943-46), Axis-occupied territories (1941-43), Kingdom of Yugoslavia (1929-1941), Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (1919-1929), Kingdom of Serbia (1913-19), Ottoman Empire for the centuries before. For persons born after 2008 OR to present Kosovo as a state in any other capacity, we use a Kosovo template for which I can provide you a link. On this occasion it is not necessary because we are talking about an adult and his birth state. The reason I took that militant approach was because you have edited the article in the past but suddenly decided to explore this new area as part of a clean-up and this gives the impression that you've got involved with the political aspects. And as I said, all of us who edit related articles need to do everything with tact, reason and caution. I hope you can see the point from this explanation. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 18:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay, fair enough. I'm sorry and thanks for the explanation. I'll hold my hands up on this case. --MrEskola (talk) 19:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the good attitude! No needs to hold the hands up, I've been working on improving the article and I've restored the bulk of your edits. Have a look and see what you think, I've taken WP:OPENPARA into account. Thanks. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 19:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I like your changes, looks much better now. I'll add few references for height and club appearances. --MrEskola (talk) 19:24, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

I'll look forward, many thanks. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 19:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jens Keller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bundesliga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding about this issue - I have now fixed the problem. --MrEskola (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Sorry for my reversion in Luis Enrique Martínez García, i see you have already taken care of the "business". I also thank you for your "thanks" note, happy weekend!

AL (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

• Updates: i have made some tweaks to your tweaks in the article, and i'll elaborate now: 1 - why the spacings in the box? I have it seen it in some articles but not ALL so it's easy to see there is no consensus on that, and it makes editing so much harder with the spacings; 2 - no need to say SPANISH again in intro, just LA LIGA suffices, ah, and there (intro) it's CELTA DE VIGO not CELTA, compression is for box; 3 - i'd say just STATISTICS suffices as title of section, it's obvious it's his career statistics; 4 - DEF'ORT and P'DATA: in the last one, the defaultsort, accents are not supposes to be there otherwise it won't work (don't ask me, ask WP), it's LUIS ENRIQUE MARTINEZ GARCIA, not LUIS ENRIQUE MARTÍNEZ GARCÍA.

Attentively --AL (talk) 14:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, next time I'll try to do as you say. --MrEskola (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Pep Guardiola

Whoops, I thought it was the UEFA Super Cup! Mattythewhite (talk) 20:57, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Luis Diego López may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Luis Diego López Breijo''' (born 22 August 1974) is an Uruguayan [[Association football|football]] [[Manager (association football)|manager) and former [[Defender (association football)|defender]], who is currently the manager of Italian [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Lucien Favre

Do you know of any source that indicates Lucien Favre was the head coach for Neuchâtel Xamax? Kingjeff (talk) 07:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MrEskola. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MrEskola. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MrEskola. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)