Mohammed Al-Keesh

Concern regarding Draft:Ahmed Jehani

Hello, Mohammed Al-Keesh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahmed Jehani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ahmed Jehani

Hello, Mohammed Al-Keesh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ahmed Jehani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Use of human shields by Hamas

Please read WP:ARBECR, as a non EC user, you can only use talk pages in this contentious topic area to post WP:EDITREQs. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 19:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Banu Qurayza ‎, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

How is it not constructive? It's obviously not neutral when every point made against the Muslims is provided, but anything in the opposite direction must have double the lines describing why it's the Muslim reasoning is false. You can't serioiusly say that an article is filled with orientalists and has a full parapgrah describing a completely speculative opinion that the Prophet to almost a third of the world's population disguised his desire to execute deutoronomy-esque punishment, but when the Muslim side is shown just a bit by saying "well this is an old testament idea, and the arbitor was a Jew" it's immediately undermined with twice the number of sentences saying 'this is a misunderstanding of deutoronomy" or "there's no contemporary sources" as if there's any to begin with. So if I'm not constructive tell me how. Mohammed Al-Keesh (talk) 21:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)