Mnbnjghiryurr

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghaznavid raid in India (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ghaznavid raid in India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Mnbnjghiryurr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghaznavid raid in India (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ghaznavid raid in India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 07:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hello, I'm Kpgjhpjm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bappa Rawal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Kpgjhpjm 06:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shivaji. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Imperial^[AFCND] 14:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

I have changed the title mountain rat because this is not a title it's given by Mughal Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 14:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Portuguese given a title atalia to shivaji this is not a title it is given by other Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 14:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Battle of Ajmer. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Imperial^[AFCND] 08:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Battle of Rampura

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Battle of Rampura has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/stream/dli.csl.7009/7009_djvu.txt and https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.32142/2015.32142.New-History-Of-The-Marathas-Vol2_djvu.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — Diannaa (talk) 22:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Maratha conquest of Malwa

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Maratha conquest of Malwa has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://books.google.co.in/books?id=d1wUgKKzawoC and https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.32142. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. DanCherek (talk) 03:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Mnbnjghiryurr/sandbox

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:Mnbnjghiryurr/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://books.google.co.in/books?id=d1wUgKKzawoC and https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.32142. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. DanCherek (talk) 03:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Umayyad invasion of Rajasthan

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Umayyad invasion of Rajasthan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://books.google.com/books?id=kZWgj-YMdVEC and https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.12693. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. DanCherek (talk) 03:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Battle of Rajasthan

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Battle of Rajasthan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://books.google.com/books?id=kZWgj-YMdVEC and https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.12693. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. DanCherek (talk) 03:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of First Vijaynagar -Qutb Shahi war

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on First Vijaynagar -Qutb Shahi war requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.12385/page/n141/mode/2up?q=%22Kuli+Kutub+Khan%22. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of First Vijaynagar -Qutb Shahi war

Hello Mnbnjghiryurr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged First Vijaynagar -Qutb Shahi war for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want First Vijaynagar -Qutb Shahi war to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 15:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Recovery of Mewar

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Recovery of Mewar has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://books.google.com/books?id=0Rm9MC4DDrcC&pg=PA122&lpg=PA122&dq=Mughal+pressure+on+Mewar+relaxed+after+1579+following+rebellions+in+Bengal+and+Bihar+and+Mirza+Hakim%27s+incursion+into+the+Punjab.&source=bl&ots=oWe3SINjvU&sig=ACfU3U3XCj33RSGoQpTa5ZO6AzXLjT-YRA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjUxeu34t2FAxVKLkQIHUoyBf8Q6AF6BAgIEAM#v=onepage&q=Mughal%20pressure%20on%20Mewar%20relaxed%20after%201579%20following%20rebellions%20in%20Bengal%20and%20Bihar%20and%20Mirza%20Hakim's%20incursion%20into%20the%20Punjab.&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Copyright violation warning

Your edit to Draft:Recovery of mewar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Text copied directly from page 122 of this book — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Ajmer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Ajmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Ajmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Imperial^[AFCND] 05:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mnbnjghiryurr/sandbox

The page Mnbnjghiryurr/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Draftified

Please see WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. Your recent article is now draftified at Draft:Bajirao's Konkan Campaign. In a verification it is found out that synthesis of sources has been used in the article throughout. Adding up some belligerents, and citing few sources in which a party succeeded a campaign is not how Military articles work. Imperial^[AFCND] 16:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Bajirao's Konkan Campaign for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bajirao's Konkan Campaign is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bajirao's Konkan Campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Imperial^[AFCND] 16:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at [[Gupta–Hunnic Wars], you may be blocked from editing. Imperial^[AFCND] 03:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gupta–Hunnic Wars, you may be blocked from editing. Jonharojjashi (talk) 18:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Ahmednagar Expedition moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ahmednagar Expedition. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and Signicant POV issues and unencyclopedic language. Article will need to be rewritten prior to being submitted to mainspace.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  // Timothy :: talk  21:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Ajmer moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Ajmer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because per result of WP:Articles for deletion/Battle of Ajmer. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Owen× ☎ 10:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bahamani-Vijaynagar war 1480–1481

Hello Mnbnjghiryurr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bahamani-Vijaynagar war 1480–1481 for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Bahamani-Vijaynagar war 1480–1481 to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

C F A 💬 02:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maratha invasion of Deccan (1739), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Handia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 13:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Bajirao's Konkan Campaign for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bajirao's Konkan Campaign is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bajirao's Konkan Campaign (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mnbnjghiryurr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please consider unblocking me. I am asking for another chance to prove myself and show that I can adhere to Wikipedia's standards. I hope you can see my positive contributions and consider giving me the opportunity to continue supporting the community in a more respectful and responsible manner. I have created many good articles which are now deleted, I want to restore them. I now know the consequences for evading the blocks and involving in sockpuppetry, from now on I'll only use this one account and contribute productively on wiki. Here are my accounts which I mistakenly created: Mnbnjghiryurr, mnbnjghiryurr, Waosonn and Woason. Please review my appeal. Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 07:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've worked hard to demonstrate you don't have the slightest intention of following Wikipedia policies. Your best bet is to go at least six months with no further edits at all, then apply under WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 09:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mnbnjghiryurr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's been more than 6 months, please consider my unblock request. I am requesting a second chance to contribute positively to the Wikipedia. Moving forward, I promise to use only this account and strictly adhere to all policies. I would be doing constructive edits and fostering a respectful environment. In the past, I created several accounts Mnbnjghiryurr, koitot, Waosonn, and Woason but I now understand the harm caused by such actions. I acknowledge the consequences of sockpuppetry and evasion and assure you it will not happen again. I have also worked on creating articles, some of which were unfortunately deleted. I hope to have the opportunity to restore and improve them in line with Wikipedia’s standards. I want to apply this unblock under WP:SO. Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 11:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Reading our guide to improving articles.
• Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
   • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
   • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
   • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
   • and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place {{reflist-talk}} at the end of the prose you have copied from the article;
5. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste an edit summary in the following form that specifies the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
6. Save the page by clicking Publish changes.
7. Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
8. When you are done with your work, save your edits, then re-request unblocking using {{unblock}}, and an administrator will review your proposed edits.

If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. -- asilvering (talk) 04:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 11:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

{{checkuser needed}} Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

No obvious technical evidence of block evasion within the data retention period. Spicy (talk) 20:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

@Mnbnjghiryurr, this unblock request only addresses the sockpuppetry. What about the reason you were blocked in the first place? Why aren't you requesting unblock under your original account? Are those the only four accounts you've ever used? -- asilvering (talk) 04:40, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

As far as I know, I was blocked because of abusively using multiple accounts, my articles and edits were mostly constructive, however I agree some of them were poorly written and that is why I want to improve all those articles after getting unblocked. I have only four accounts that I have ever used, I am appealing my unblock from this account because this account has most of my contributions. Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 13:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

You were blocked for 48 hours, and then indefinitely, for making disruptive edits. The talk page of your original account shows a whole pile of warnings: [1]. It looks like you were engaged in at least one edit war, committed copyright violations, and failed to provide sources for your edits. You had some edits reverted as vandalism, and you were working in a contentious topic area (WP:ARBIPA). That's a lot to come back from, and if you think it's the sockpuppetry that is the main problem, that worries me. -- asilvering (talk) 14:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Significa liberdade Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 13:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi there! As asilvering stated, although you have addressed concerns regarding sockpuppetry, you have not addressed the concerns with the original block. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

@asilvering @Significa liberdade Indeed my contributions contain edit warring and writing poor articles with close paraphrasing. But that was a year ago and since then I have changed by going through all of the Wikipedia guidelines, so I seek a second chance to show that I have improved my ways of editing. Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation! Can you explain what you will do in the future to avoid edit warring and writing close paraphrases? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:02, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

I would WP:TALKFIRST and get consensus before editing in any contentious topic area, so that I would not be involved in 3RR or edit warring. For the close paraphrasing, I have learned how to write articles in my own words and not only switch the words in the sources by their synonyms. Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 13:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Okay, if you can commit to all that, that's good to hear. Because of the sourcing and copyvio issues, I've given you the "second chance" offer so you can demonstrate that you know how to use sources correctly. The directions tell you to make edits to an existing wikipedia article, but if you wanted to write a short new article that would be fine too. If you do pick an existing article to work on, please follow the instructions in the decline notice very carefully. -- asilvering (talk) 04:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

@aslivering I can demonstrate constructive edits, however I need to thoroughly review the process so is it okay if I do this later, as I have to prepare for this and choose what to edit constructively. Mnbnjghiryurr (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Yes, you can take all the time you need. I won't review the next unblock request (because I declined this one), but you're welcome to ask questions. You can also edit on simple-wiki (or any other wiki) while you are blocked here at en-wiki. Be careful to pay attention to any warnings you might receive, since other projects are going to be less likely to extend the normal levels of good faith to someone who is blocked on another project. -- asilvering (talk) 17:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)