Mjks28

Max Ernst Wikipedia Article

Hello Mjks28, I noticed that you deleted my contribution on the Max Ernst page, stating 'IMDb is not a reliable source'. However, I was an extra on the production, and I can confirm that German actor Mike Hoffmann is indeed playing Max Ernst. So, true info. Not made up. It's real. Kind regards! 10 December 2024 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.78.89.210 (talk) 08:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

@194.78.89.210 IMDb is a user contributed site, so it's information cannot be proved to be reliable. I appreciate your input as an extra, but without a reliable source, adding information about the production would be original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Mjks28 (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Okay, fair enough, I can see that. Am I allowed to add the same info in November 2025, when the series has aired on television (and the cast credits on the programme itself are a reliable source)? 194.78.89.210 (talk) 12:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

@194.78.89.210, you can add the same information in as soon as a reliable source backs up the claims. Hope this helps. Mjks28 (talk) 13:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Have a lovely day! 194.78.89.210 (talk) 08:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 NPP Backlog Drive sign up

Hello Mjks28, I noticed that you are signed up for the September 2024 NPP Backlog Drive. However, you're going to be unable to participate if you do not have the New Page Reviewer permission. If you are still interested in participating in the backlog drive, then I encourage you to request the permission at WP:PERM/NPR. I have, for the moment, removed you from the participants list as you are not able to participate at this point in time. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

a smelly Shelly that works at the local Delhi,selling meat jelly and pork belly

Detectiveshonks (talk) 02:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bear season 1 (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by YoungForever was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bear season 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— YoungForever^(talk) 05:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bear season 2 (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by YoungForever was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bear season 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— YoungForever^(talk) 05:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bear season 3 (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by YoungForever was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bear season 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— YoungForever^(talk) 05:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

"Chapter Two: MADMAX" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Chapter Two: MADMAX has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 4 § Chapter Two: MADMAX until a consensus is reached. Gonnym (talk) 10:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

DCWC September update

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

• Arconning (submissions) – 386 points, with several good articles primarily relating to the Olympics
• Vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 141 points, who created multiple articles about abortion rights and laws in African countries
• TheNuggeteer (submissions) – 126 points, who has contributed to several articles associated with the Phillippines
• Jaguarnik (submissions) – 125 points, with several good article reviews and an appearance in the In the news section of the Main Page
• Averageuntitleduser (submissions) – 119 points, and has written about several Haitian topics and historical figures.

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The White Lotus season 1 has been accepted

The White Lotus season 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NotAGenious (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bear season 2 has been accepted

The Bear season 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 12:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The White Lotus season 2 has been accepted

The White Lotus season 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 16:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:M a n e t h

Hello, Mjks28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:M a n e t h, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Blood Legacy (TV series)

Hello,

I hope you’re doing well. While I appreciate the edits you made to the Blood Legacy (TV series) article, I believe that some of the changes were too drastic. I would kindly ask that you avoid making significant deletions without thorough consideration, especially since the series is still new. I will be reverting most of the changes you made.

Thank you for your understanding. Afro 📢Talk! 08:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

What parts of my edits would you consider "too drastic"? Just wondering so I can avoid making those mistakes in future. I would be happy to discuss any concerns you have regarding my edits, and provide my reasoning for doing them. Mjks28 (talk) 08:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

I noticed that you deleted the season overview section, which I believe was unnecessary, I have since reverted that section and will be making further adjustments. As I mentioned before, I appreciate your contributions to the article, but I would kindly suggest taking a more measured approach with future edits.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. Afro 📢Talk! 08:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, but the series overview is not needed for an article until at least a second season has been released. Please look through MOS:TVOVERVIEW before you revert my edits. While you may not agree with all my edits, please keep in mind the guidelines of Wikipedia, and the MOSes we follow. Mjks28 (talk) 08:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

sir/ma i completely understand the guidelines but this series is a 20 episode series not just a 6 or 4 episode limited series Afro 📢Talk! 09:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@Afrowriter The series overview doesn't add any new information; all episodes of the season were released on the same day. If it was released in two halves over two years, it may be useful to include. But currently, it is unnecessary and doesn't follow the MOS. Mjks28 (talk) 09:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Ok no problem thanks Afro 📢Talk! 09:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Only Murders in the Building season one has been accepted

Only Murders in the Building season one, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Succession season 1 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Succession season 1. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Succession season one has been accepted

Succession season one, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	for your work expanding the Arrested Development episodes Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Only Murders in the Building season 2 has been accepted

Only Murders in the Building season 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— YoungForever^(talk) 21:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sex Education series 1 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sex Education series 1. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Office (Australian TV series) (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Office (Australian TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Mjks28! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Menendez

Since we have all agreed on the spelling of: Menendez. I am replacing the incorrect spellings as much as possible. Do you know if there is a useful tool for that? Because I think I've had most of them now, but there will always be a few stray ones. Greetings RuedNL2 (talk) 10:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

@RuedNL2 I would just go through any pages linked in the parent article that mention the brothers, and use CTRL+F to find the incorrect spellings and replace them. Unfortunately, I don't know of any tools that could do it more efficiently. It might help to see if there is a bot that could do it. Mjks28 (talk) 10:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Oh okay, thanks! I have now found the tool I was looking for: Special:WhatLinksHere. If I type in 'Lyle and Erik Menéndez', I see all articles where it is still linked / written in this way. RuedNL2 (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know about this tool! Good luck with replacing all the incorrect spellings :) Mjks28 (talk) 11:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

About 100 pages later. But it worked haha. Thanks again! RuedNL2 (talk) 12:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

DCWC closing update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points, Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions; BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months, Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!

In addition to his spot in the top three, BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)! Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.

The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Euphoria season 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Euphoria season 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Euphoria season 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Euphoria season 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/IMAX Melbourne at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:M a n e t h

Hello, Mjks28. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "M a n e t h".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Removal

Hello, Mjks28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Removal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chardee MacDennis: The Game of Games

Hello, Mjks28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chardee MacDennis: The Game of Games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

"Obvious vandalism"

I recently edited the Thomas Hardy article by removing the "OM" post-nominal in the lead sentence, which I explained by referring to MOS:POSTNOM which states "post-nominal letters may be included in the main body of the article, but not in the lead sentence of the article." Biographical articles about other OM holders conform to this rule. You reverted my change within a minute with the explanation "Obvious vandalism".

Please explain why you reverted my change, and how your offensive accusation of vandalism conforms with the WP:Civility policy?

I am restoring my edit. If you disagree with it, then discuss it on the talk page with a reasoned argument. Masato.harada (talk) 11:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

I apologise, the "Obvious vandalism" was referring to revision 1259836285, where there was indeed obvious vandalism. I did not see your edit when I restored the article to revision 1259836026. Mjks28 (talk) 12:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Apology accepted. I've just seen the trail left by User:41.33.173.74, and reverted a couple more of their edits. Masato.harada (talk) 12:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tom Lofaro

Hello, Mjks28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom Lofaro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Heath Cullens

Hello, Mjks28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Heath Cullens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

New merge/notability discussion at Brian Thompson (businessman)

Hello there! I noticed you recently participated in a discussion of a requested move for the article Brian Thompson (businessman). That discussion was closed without an ultimate consensus decision for procedural reasons. There is a new discussion open on the article talk page, and all participants in the prior move discussion are encouraged to participate. Thank you! Flip^andFlopped ツ 22:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Barbie Adler

Hello, Mjks28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barbie Adler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John Levenstein

Hello, Mjks28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Levenstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Rosenstock

Hello, Mjks28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Rosenstock, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Only Murders in the Building

Template:Only Murders in the Building has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alex_21 _TALK 23:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of IMAX Melbourne

Hello! Your submission of IMAX Melbourne at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:57, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chuck Martin (producer)

Hello, Mjks28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chuck Martin (producer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to The White Lotus, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. lots of small edits clog peoples watchlists and can be avoided by using preview button Indagate (talk) 09:20, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Paul 012. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks. Redlinks are useful and can often be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" link (in the tools listed at the left in desktop view) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Paul_012 (talk) 10:47, 19 December 2024 (UTC)