Mistico

Welcome!

Hello, Mistico, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Bachrach44 00:26, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Sporting players

Hi - I've proposed that Category:Sporting players be renamed to Category:Sporting Clube de Portugal players as I feel the current name is too ambiguous. Your thoughts would be welcome - please see Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. Qwghlm 10:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

António Abreu

I've first moved António Abreu to António Simões de Abreu because his father was also called António Abreu and was also a notable anti-fascist and communist militant and so, that would be ambiguous. You broke that logic with no explanation! Please, try to revert it, or at least move it to (António Abreu (son)) or something like that. Otherwise I'll do it myself. Regards. Afonso Silva 19:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

In Portugal, most people simply know António Abreu (son). This is the english spkeaking wikipedia, so I think it should remain António Abreu, simply, unless you had also a entry about his well known father ( that I confess, didn´t know). I didn´t broke any logic, I just tought his name wasn´t in the form he´s usually refered in Portugal. User:Mistico

That's the logic I followed in the beggining, after knowing about his father's death, two months ago. If someone creates an article about him what would be the name of the article? António de Abreu (Portugal) 2. And I really don't know the reason of puting "(Portugal)" after its name if no article with the name António Abreu exists. If people in Portugal don't use the full name they would be redirected until someone creates an article on his father, that's the aim of redirect pages. Regards. Afonso Silva 20:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Prime Ministers of Portugal

Good work on the Prime Ministers. Keep up. Gameiro 20:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

João Rodrigues

I'd just like to make you aware that your January 21 edit to João Rodrigues Tçuzu changed the Japanese characters in the article into question marks - you should avoid using whatever editor or browser you used to edit that article, or at least check the diff after you make the change. You can see the diff at [1] - notice how the question marks have been highlighted in red, showing that there was a change made there in addition to the change to "Rodrigues" that you intended. It can be somewhat confusing because if you don't have Japanese fonts on your computer, the before and after will both appear as question marks to you, but the question marks on the right are "real" question marks whereas on the left they are Japanese characters that merely appear as question marks on your display because you lack the right fonts. I've fixed the article in any case. DopefishJustin 20:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Please cite

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Katie Holmes, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 00:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Katie Holmes left Catholicism to become a scientologist, wen she decided to marry Tom Cruise. It´s well known and it´s stated in the Wikipedia article that too. So, as you can see I have a reliable source for adding her to the Former Catholics category. It was an act of justice to her, and I didn´t do that in any anti or pro-catholic point of view. I sugest you to read the Wikipedia article about her again, to see how she can be considered a former catholic. Please tell me, can a person be a catholic and a scientologist at the same time ? User:Mistico

Emil Nolde

Hello Mistico, I saw the merge proposal for the "Nolde" article and the "Emil Nolde" article. Whoever came up with the idea of having two separate entries in the first place? Sheesh. Anyhow, I don't know if you added the merge template at Nolde but there was none at "Emil Nolde" so I placed one there along with my vote to "merge." Ande B 22:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

artur v. arturo

I just found your February comment at Talk:Arturo Santos. Could you please read my response to you there? pat8722 02:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Pedro Barbosa

I created the article that was indicated on your user page. Mark272 21:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Page Blanking

On 3-May, you blanked Trifon Ivanov (footballer). Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. I've reverted it to the previous version. If this was the result of a broken edit, you may wish to make the correct edits. If you believe the page should be deleted, please follow the deletion procedures. If you have questions, please let me know. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 02:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

As you can see the article about Trifon Ivanov(fooballer) is about the mae person as Trifon Ivanov, so I think it should be merged. User:Mistico

I have redirected Trifon Ivanov (footballer) to Trifon Ivanov. If you find a similar case in the future, instead of blanking, you can redirect yourself or you can propose a merger. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 00:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Signing your posts on talk pages

Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful. Conscious 07:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Cunhal

Please, reference that with Cunhal's own work. The 1991 fact is true. The remaining are not true, at least, written that way. Carrillo and Berlinguer have nothing to do with Cunhal, not even close, not only in the ideological sense, but also in the political objectives. The last sentence about communist dictatorship is obviously an eternal non-NPOV questions. "Some people believe" is not a good way to present content in a neutral way. I'm not protecting Cunhal, I'm just eliminating unreferenced content, according to WP:OR. Cheers! Afonso Silva 23:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Ruy Luís Gomes

Nice work with the article about Ruy Luís Gomes, I was going to create it after introducing a reference to the 1951 presidential elections in an article, when I realized you had already done it. I you want to collaborate in this kind of topics just tell me, Cheers! Afonso Silva 21:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Your move

Josè Luis da Cruz Vidigal commonly know as Luis Vidigal, no sense to move to Josè Vidigal. Matt86hk talk 03:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Dimofte

Hi. Glad to be of assistance. The solution is subtle, but rather simple, though: you can type the letter/name with a diacritic in the editing window, and copy it to the new version in the move request. (As I'm sure you noted, all diacritics appear as clickable symbols at the bottom of your editing window.) Just in case you should find this info useful in the future. Best, Dahn (talk) 23:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the information ! Mistico (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Karl Barth, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Flex (talk/contribs) 02:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I simply deleted what semed to be an useless question, like it was agreed then. Even if it wasn´t vandalism, I apologize for that.Mistico (talk) 14:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:FSweeney.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:FSweeney.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Valentin Melnychuk

The article states that he was the "trainer" of the National Team. What do you mean by trainer? In American parlance, "trainer" means an employee that makes sure everyone on the team is healthy. If that's what you are refering to, than the person isn't notable enough for Wikpedia's notability standards. But I suspect that the "trainer" you are refering to is something else. Please let know. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I meant "coach". I am sorry. I taught in british english "trainer" was the same as coach.213.13.243.157 (talk) 16:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. That's what I suspected. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Rugby

By any chance, are you from Fiji, you seem to know a lot about Fiji Rugby players.? ..--Cometstyles 13:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

No, sorry ! I´m just doing my work at the Google search, we find material about these players at the official site of Fiji rugby union Federation. I´m from Portugal. I finished recently all the biographies of the members of the Portuguese squad that entered the 2007 Rugby World Cup finals. I decided also to finish Fiji team, because it reached the quarter-finals and all the 10 1 st tier teams have their 30 members squad bios completed.14:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Melania Carolina Hotu Hey

Hello. Do you have a source for any of the info on Melania Carolina Hotu Hey? It has been requested since March 2008. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I simply started the article. Someone else added the other information. The person who did that seems to be from Chile so it seems like reliable information.Mistico (talk) 20:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

{{Portugal-rugbyunion-bio-stub}}

Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 00:24, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I didn´t knew that. I am sorry for my ignorance. But I totally understand. Anyway, both the templates I started I think are usefull, since there are plenty of rugby union players in Wikipedia from Argentina (currently 70) and Portugal (currently 34).Mistico (talk) 16:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Solomon Islands rugby logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Solomon Islands rugby logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arajaryr Moreira de Campos

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Arajaryr Moreira de Campos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article doesn't assert the individual notability of the person. Only because she was close to someone famous, it doesn't mean she is famous as well.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Victor Lopes (talk) 01:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

She was the secretary and personal assistant of general Humberto Delgado, a national hero of Portugal. She was also murdered with him, in 1965. This tragic ending I think justifies her inclusion.Mistico (talk) 22:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Pro-life movement articles

Can you please help to edit some new articles related to this one ? There´s a new user who keeps editing articles related with Christianity and abortion in a very biased way. Thanks.Mistico (talk) 20:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I also find her edits to be problematic, given that something like 95 % of early Christians were against abortion. Just because 5 % of early Christians did not speak out against it doesn't mean that the vast majority of the Church didn't oppose it. Quoting the Bible can never be a substitute for the authoritative teachings of ecclesiastical synods and councils by the way. If you have a problem with this, you should consider reporting it as a matter of concern to senior administrators, who have dealt with her before it seems. The user was apparently blocked back in October 2007 for having abused a number of multiple accounts (cf [2] and checkuser). I am in no sense part of the Wikipedia élite, so I couldn't really contribute to solving conflicts in ways that most administrators could. ADM (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining that. I already advised her about original research and reliable source, because she even shows Amazon as a source. I also pointed that her article about History of early Christian thought on abortion is too biased and written in a personal essay way. I tried to delete the entire article because it was a confusing mess, but without success. You can see her honesty in the fact that she deleted the entire quotes from the Church Fathers on abortion. She also seems to forget that it was the interpretation of the Gospels that lead to the anti-abortion stance of the first Christians.Mistico (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mistico! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 69 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Eduardo Simone - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Albert Cigagna - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. John Mallett - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Graham Dawe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Lucian Sîrbu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Balie Swart - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Aubin Hueber - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Fernando Díaz Alberdi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Héctor Mendéz (rugby) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Ricardo Andorinho - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Mário João

Hello! Do you know the full name of this Portuguese football player? Many sources adfirm Mário Rodrigues João, while other ones state only Mário João. If you know something more, plese, write me here. --VAN ZANT (talk) 10:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

The source I know had his name simply has Mário João. Nevertheless there are other sources who probably have his full name.Mistico (talk) 19:15, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Cristóbal Acosta

I'm somewhat confused by this edit. Could you have a look at Cristóbal Acosta and Cristóvão da Costa and clarify it to me? Cheers, —Ruud 15:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

These are two different persons. You can see by yourself that Cristóvão da Costa was both the name of a Portuguese 16th century physician, who settled in Spain were he became known by the Spanish form of his name, and also of a contemporary Portuguese lawyer. There is a larger biography of the lawyer Cristóvão da Costa in the Portuguese Wikipedia.Mistico (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any sources that Cristóbal Acosta is also referred to as Cristóvão da Costa? English-language would be preferable, or is he only called this way in Potugese? Cheers, —Ruud 16:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I am from Portugal and he is refered in here by both versions of his name, like the Portuguese Wikipedia article shows: [3]. It is in a simlar case to Ferdinand Magellan, in Spanish he is always refered as Hernando Magallanes while in Portuguese he is refered by his birth name that was Fernão de Magalhães.Mistico (talk) 16:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

José Rakoto

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: José Rakoto. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

1936 Rugby union tournament in Berlin

Hi,

I'm seeking information about the Italian team coached by my great-uncle... Where did you find this result table tournament ?

Regards.

MENUISERIE91 (talk) 09:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

I just started the article, it was someone else who add these informations. If you want to know more I can recommend you the site [4]. You can find here references to the games and players from that tournament. The official website of the French Rugby Federation also shows the games France XV did back then: [5]. It's a shame that the 1936 Rugby tournament was never given any official status even as a demonstration sport because it proved that rugby union was totally viable as Olympic sport. It was the last competition of that international level until the 1987 Rugby World Cup. I already thaught myself in expanding that article but I haven't had the time yet. Regards!Mistico (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation

In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.

To avoid accusations that this posting violates WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 20:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I agree with the current phrasing. It is rather neutral and more adequate for a very controversial matter.Mistico (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Would you be willing to go to the page and state your opinion there? Thanks! HuskyHuskie (talk) 03:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

I have no problem with that. I thaught wrongly that the discussion was already closed.Mistico (talk) 18:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Edgar Babou

Thanks for the new article Edgar Babou. However, I noticed the article contains errors. The article currently does not contain any references. As a new article, the most important thing is to find reliable references for all existing information. As you know, there’s always room for more work to make your article even better. So thank you, Jipinghe (talk) 19:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Moldova Rugby Union.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Moldova Rugby Union.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 19:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Lithuania Rugby Federation.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Lithuania Rugby Federation.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 19:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Unreferenced Biographies

Hi. Thanks for your recent contributions. However, I have noticed a few biographies (Stefano Saviozzi and Laurent Travini) have been created that lack inline citations. It is very important to add citations to Biographies of living people. I notice you link to statistics in external links section, but it would be better to have these as references. Regards AIRcorn (talk)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Opposition to the legalisation of abortion". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by January 4, 2011.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 01:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Opposition to the legalisation of abortion, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 21:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Reformed Church in America

You added a request for an image to the article but have not indicated what sort of image might be useful. I expect we have pictures of individual churches available. Rmhermen (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

I guess some pictures of the Reformed Church in America churches and historical figures would be adequated.Mistico (talk) 16:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks and regards for uploading three pictures in the Reformed Church in America entry. They really improve the article.Mistico (talk) 00:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Mistico. You have new messages at Talk:England national roller hockey team.
Message added 22:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Mistico! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The Salvation Army article

Can you please give me your help and opinion on a issue now on debate about how to source the Salvation Army stances on life issues. I think I am on the side of reason but I need some other people help and opinion. Regards!....Mistico (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

I will try to find some time tomorrow to look into this, but I must first caution you that, at first glance, it appears you may be involved in edit warring on that article. You may want to back off for a day or two; the article will still be here. HuskyHuskie (talk) 08:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

I am out of the article by now. I think I confused some rules about copyright. I simply wanted the article to have more information. Take care.Mistico (talk) 17:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I was just about to go look at it right now. Happy New Year to you; see you around. HuskyHuskie (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Sting albums

Category:Sting albums, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Article Opposition to the legalization of abortion

I would like to know the opinion of an administrator about the deletion of the rewritting of the following paragraph, because it was deleted by a user, and I honestly think it gives a better context to the question: "Pro-life advocates generally maintain that since human life begins at conception, the unborn human fetus (and in most cases the human embryo) is a person and therefore should have his right to life safeguarded by law." I know its a sensitive article on a sensitive topic and I would like to have an administrator opinion about if I could reinsert the deleted part once again. Thank you.Mistico (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

• Content disputes should be discussed at the article's talk page, as editors there will be able to build a stronger consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:24, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the information.Mistico (talk) 23:49, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Anglican Diocese of Pittsburgh article

I would like to ask an administrator to please move the article name to this previous form. It is the official name of the diocese not simply Diocese of Pittsburgh. Since there are no other diocese named like this one, it makes no sense, like a user did, without any previous debate on Talk Page, to move is name to Diocese of Pittsburgh. I would like to ask an administrator to make this move to the original form and to please give a warn to that user, who attempted twice to change his name.Mistico (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Non admin response - It looks like you have already made the move yourself. Please leave a note on the talk page of the other user explaining why you have reversed their move, if you have any other issues that require administrator attention, then please use {{adminhelp}} which alerts admins to an issue. Thanks - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 13:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the helpfull information.Mistico (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Response to you regarding Anglicans for Life

Hi there! I'm so sorry it's taken so long to get back to you - you requested my help for the Anglicans for Life page? Just let me know what I can do to help! Cath_220 Cath 220 (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Have you read what I asked? I questioned if Anglicans for Life is officially recognized by the Church of England and if it is also active or if there are proposals for that in the United Kingdom, Ireland and outside North America and Africa, and if you find the article information satisfactory enough.Mistico (talk) 23:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

verberwhats?

Your change a year ago to Christian Reformed Church in North America has a word that can't be found - "verberates" - at the very least it is a very uncommon word. Can you think of what word you could substitute that would be understood better? Shenme (talk) 04:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

English isn't my first language, it's Portuguese. The word "verberate" really exists [6] but I don't think its the most adequate in that context. I am replacing that word by "condemns". Thank you for the notification.Mistico (talk) 02:00, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Goebbels response

Hi. Please see my response on relevant talk page. Cheers Irondome (talk) 20:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

That is an improvement. Indeed it provides a deeper linkage with his cupability that the previous version lacked. Cheers. Irondome (talk) 20:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

You`re welcome.Mistico (talk) 21:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

	Christianity articles contributor
	For your wonderful contributions in Christian related topics. Thank you for your patient and wonderful work! Newchildrenofthealmighty (talk) 20:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I feel honoured.Mistico (talk) 00:47, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Zurab Mtchedlishvili Article

I would like to report the fact that a user I think acting with bad faith added a deletion proposal to the article I had created about Georgian international rugby union player Zurab Mtchedlishvili, despite the fact that the article was well sourced and by all means meeting Wikipedia notability criteria, like all those players from Georgia who entered the 2007 Rugby World Cup finals, unlike what was claimed and led to the article deletion. This was the RS I used and ESPN has been used as RS a for other rugby players: [7] I would like to know what can be done for the article to be fully restored. Thank you. [8]Mistico (talk) 01:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

The article was not deleted; it's at Zurab Mtchedlishvili, not Zurab Mtchelishvili -- Diannaa (talk) 01:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Actually it was deleted; I undeleted it. There are several issues. First of all you should assume good faith. Secondly, a page of naked statistics that doesn't write so much as a single sentence about Mtchedlishvili isn't quite the significant coverage necessary to write an article about him. So you should provide better sources that discuss him in some detail. If it isn't improved, it may well be deleted again. For example, that page of statistics doesn't serve to verify that he played for Domont and Figeac, or that he was one of the oldest players present at the 2007 Rugby World Cup. Huon (talk) 01:57, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your action. If there is a need for more sources they can be provided. I am now adding one about the teams where he played in France.Mistico (talk) 12:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. User:Roddyboy.dp.12345.69‎ appears to be a new vandalism-only account. Please help Wikipedia nip new vandalism accounts in the bud, by promptly warning them to stop. Reify-tech (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Peter Doig

I see that you added a specific birth date for Peter Doig in this edit. Could you please add your source for this personal information as well? Thank you, --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 16:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

There are several sources that give that date. This one for example: [9]Mistico (talk) 18:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 13:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Category fix

You forgot to create the category "Spanish roller hockey players" for Jordi Bargalló. Category "Rink hockey players" needs to be deleted.

I've tried to fix them. Take a look. :) BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk) 21:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I was going to create it but I hadn't time. Thanks for doing it.Mistico (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Romanian rugby player in Leeds

The thing is that the other guy seems to be right. Players shouldn't be in the Romanian rugby union players cat if they are already in the subcat Romanian international rugby union players. Also if the RWC category only has one member at the moment then that's not a problem unless it could only ever have 1 or 2 members. GordyB (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Question

I would like to know if the comments that this user [10] keeps on posting in the articles he edits are in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. I think he tends to be somewhat hysterical and has a tendency to mock other users work that can be seen as irritating. I think we all should respect other peoples work and comment, if needed, in a more proper way, when editing an article.Mistico (talk) 01:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

He is quite fast-talking and quick to speak, and I would say he should watch his language in edit summaries. However, his userpage claims he's a Portuguese editor, so it might just be a language barrier. K6ka (talk | contribs) 01:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I am also from Portugal and his mentality that "I speak better english than you" is a bit out of place in Wikipedia.Mistico (talk) 02:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

• I agree completely with the reasoning Mr. Mistico, no sarcasm there, i have no business writing some of the summaries i do. I present my sincere apologies, and promise it will not happen again. Was now editing José Pereira (footballer) and noticed your "comeback", and have the following the say without excusing my (stupid at times) summary: 1 - you can sometimes say "success" instead of "win" in regard to football; 2 - no need to say "José Pereira", "Pereira" is fine as that bit of the article (and the entire article overall) referred to no other Pereira; 3 - when you use the sporting word "first-choice", it's not obligatory to add "the", if you do it is correct, but if you do not it's correct as well; 4 - his last cap was won in November 1966, not September.

The fact that i am an undiagnosed/unmedicated bipolar also does not help much, unfortunately. Tendo dito isto, volto a apresentar as minhas sentidas desculpas caro colega utlizador. Com os melhores cumprimentos --AL (talk) 00:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Bom, parece ser que as desculpas não vão ser aceites, tentei o meu melhor sinceramente, quis mesmo desculpar-me porque sem dúvida que me portei mal. Peço desculpa pelo incómodo, fica a nota do tratamento de silêncio e do facto de ter sido acusado na página de outro utilizador sem ter tido hipótese de me defender, descobri aquilo por acaso; ah, e também boas notícias, dia 13 de Julho abandono a WP, já ninguém tem que levar comigo (e mais uma vez não estou a ser sarcástico, às vezes sou bastante imbecil a pesar de bem-intencionado no geral; deve ser wiki-cansaço, já lá vão oito anos).

Não incomodo mais, adeus --AL (talk) 00:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Aceito as suas desculpas. Peço desculpa por não ter respondido antes. Desejo-lhe as melhores felicidades caso queira continuar como editor da Wikipédia. Cumprimentos.Mistico (talk) 01:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

• Obrigado, não é necessário pedir desculpas, também lhe desejo as maiores felicidades, mas a minha decisão já está tomada --AL (talk) 11:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: ACNA statistics

Hello, Mistico. You have new messages at Ltwin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

English title conventions

Hello Mistico. I see you've just moved the Dialogue of Comfort article to A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation. The problem there is that by convention prepositions (in, on, at, over, and yes, also against) are not capitalised in English titles. Could you move it to the more appropriate A Dialogue of Comfort against Tribulation? Regards, --Andreas Philopater (talk) 00:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Its done. Thank you for the information.Mistico (talk) 19:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Mistico, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Happy editing, JudeccaXIII (talk) 18:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Godfrey of Bouillon

Hi Mistico. About Godfrey of Bouillon. The cat fits because Godfrey is said to have been attacked and seriously wounded by a bear whilst on crusade.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I don`t think it does. There's not even mention to this at the entry. There are several versions about the way Godfrey of Bouillon died. None of them can be taken by granted. The one you mentioned must be another version but its not even in the entry, and for that you would need a RS (Reliable Source). This is what is written concerning his death at the entry: "While he was besieging the city of Acre, Godfrey, the ruler of Jerusalem, was struck by an arrow, which killed him", reports the Arab chronicler Ibn al-Qalanisi. Christian chronicles make no mention of this; instead, Albert of Aix and Ekkehard of Aura report that Godfrey contracted an illness in Caesarea in June, 1100. It was later believed that the emir of Caesarea had poisoned him, but there seems to be no basis for this rumour; William of Tyre does not mention it. It is also said that he died after eating a poisoned apple. In any event, he died in Jerusalem after suffering from a prolonged illness." As you can see there are at least four different claims for the way he died, none mentiones a bear attack. That would be the fifth but its not even at the current state of the entry. Even if it was since its unproven like the other claims he couldn`t be added to these categories because there is no strong evidence for that.Mistico (talk) 01:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

The attack was noted by the contemporary chroniclers Albert of Aachen and Guibert of Nogent. Apparently Godfrey was a mauled by a bear as the crusaders trekked through Anatolia. It's a well known little episode. Just search the article for "bear" in the article. The whole thing may seem outlandish at first, but you'll see that the cat wasn't added as vandalism. Tyerman and Asbridge mention the attack in chapter four of the following books I've got on hand. You can check Google Books yourself for others. Asbridge specifically dates the attack to August 1097. Tyerman teaches at Hertford College, Oxford.[11] Asbridge reads history at Queen Mary University of London.[12] Both men are specialists in the study of the crusades. Good sources.

• Tyerman, C (2007). God's War: A New History of the Crusades. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-141-90431-3. {{cite book}}: |format= requires |url= (help)
• Asbridge, T (2005). The First Crusade: A New History. London: The Free Press. ISBN 0-7432-2084-6.

--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 22:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining that. I think you should add these facts and references to the entry.Mistico (talk) 03:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Mistico! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:12, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Masjid Malcolm Shabazz (New York)

Hi Mistico. Thank you for improving and moving the article. Is there a reason why you included the disambiguator "New York" in the title? There are no other articles on Wikipedia titled Masjid Malcolm Shabazz (that link is a redirect to Masjid Malcolm Shabazz (New York)). Thanks. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately I wasn't able to move the title to the form that I wanted, because there was already a disambiguation page with that name, so I will have to ask at requested moves to change the title to simply Masjid Malcolm Shabazz.Mistico (talk) 13:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Re: Mario Adinolfi

Thank you for creating this article. I added it to Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2015/Results, which tracks new and improved LGBT-related articles during the month of June as part of the annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign. If you create or improve other LGBT-related articles this month, please feel free to add them to this list as well. Thanks again! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Lagos Province for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lagos Province is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lagos Province until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:19, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Lagos Province

I would like to report the user User:Wikicology for his bad faith while attempting first to merge the article without any explanation with the one concerning the Church of Nigeria, knowing that that merger eliminated the content of the article relating to the Lagos Province, and second by trying to having him deleted, while the article meets all the notability criteria. If there is a lack of sources its another story.Mistico (talk) 16:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

"Meets all the notability criteria" and "there is a lack of sources" contradict each other. Merging an article without reliable third-party sources, even if unreferenced content is removed in the process, or nominating it for deletion, is not an indication of bad faith. Unless there is additional evidence, you should assume good faith. Huon (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello. I'm 50.197.143.157. I just wanted to let you know that I have tagged Peter Thorburn, a page you created with {{BLP sources}} because it is a biography that contains only one source. Per the BLP policy, these articles may be proposed for deletion if it's not improved. Thank you. 50.197.143.157 (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

What is this?

https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Argentina_Jaguars&oldid=680741664&diff=prev

--InTheCarnage (talk) 05:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes, the game is listed in that website: I copied myself. Please dont deleted important material only because you think its wrong, without any proof. Thats considered vandalism. "*26.09.1965 XV CHILE SANTIAGO WON 23 - 11

• 11.10.1969 XV CHILE SANTIAGO WON 54 - 0
• 20.06.1975 XV CHILE SANTIAGO WON 54 - 8
• 09.07.1979 XV CHILE LOST 7 - 88
• 08.06.1998 XV URUGUAY BUENOS AIRES WON 72 - 5"

[13]Mistico (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

I did more research and I think you were right in doubting it, its a mistake by that website, the real result was a win by Argentina B over Chile by 88-7. [14]Mistico (talk) 18:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

That's ok. I know that Chile never beat ARG. I don't speak english, that explains my bad communication. Cheers, --InTheCarnage (talk) 03:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kim Davis (county clerk), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also, please don't remove reliable sources and please follow WP:NPOV. - MrX 02:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Did you actually read the source that I provided? It seems to prove that Pope Francis indeed meet privately and not in a group of people, unlike some secular press stated, with Kim Davis and her husband and encouraged her for the position: "On September 29, Inside the Vatican and Liberty Counsel both announced that Pope Francis met privately with Kim Davis on September 24. Since the announcement, there has been a wide variety of reporting ranging from some who deny any meeting occurred to others who admit a meeting occurred but that Kim Davis was merely one of many in a sea of faces. The fact is, Kim Davis was invited to a private meeting with the Pope and did meet privately with him on the afternoon of September 24, during which meeting Pope Francis said to Kim, “I want to thank you for your courage” and “Stay strong.”" [15] The way that part of the entry is written seems to rely too much in the secular liberal press and it misses an important point that Pope Francis stated during his visit to the United States that is the right to conscience objection. He said to the press: "I can’t have in mind all cases that can exist about conscientious objection. But, yes, I can say that conscientious objection is a right that is a part of every human right. It is a right. And if a person does not allow others to be a conscientious objector, he denies a right. Conscientious objection must enter into every juridical structure because it is a right, a human right. Otherwise we would end up in a situation where we select what is a right, saying “this right that has merit, this one does not.” It (conscientious objection) is a human right. It always moved me when I read, and I read it many times, when I read the “Chanson de Roland” when the people were all in line and before them was the baptismal font and they had to choose between the baptismal font or the sword. They had to choose. They weren’t permitted conscientious objection. It is a right and if we want to make peace we have to respect all rights."Mistico (talk) 03:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes I read it. It was written by Liberty Counsel, and reprinted in the opinion section of a news blog. In no way is it a reliable source, and it's a very poor substitute for sources with well-established reputations such as CNN, USA Today, NPR and The Atlantic. - MrX 12:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

I suppose that his article by Vaticanist John Allen is a better source: [16]Mistico (talk) 14:50, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alfred Delp may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] and [[treason]].<ref>Urteil des Volksgerichtshofs Berlin, 1.Senat vom 9.bis 11. Januar 1945 (1L439/44 - 1L397/44 - OJ 21/4 G Rs - OJ 38/44 gRs</ref> The [[court]] had dropped the charge
• * ''Gesammelte Schriften'' (German edition of his Complete Works, organized by Father Roman Bleistein, S.J.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Mistico, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity related articles, especially your recent creation of the Anglican Diocese of the Upper Midwest. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 01:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the honour.Mistico (talk) 18:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add explanations for edits

Hello! Please make sure to add explanations to describe the edits. It makes it easier for everyone to share reasons for contributing and for improving content.SeminarianJohn (talk) 04:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

I did some research and I found out that the Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church isn't so much conservative as the Lutheran Churches of Latvia and Lithuania, for example, they ordain women, so I deleted that paragraph. They also don't have the same close ties with the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod as these two other churches: [17]Mistico (talk) 01:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Persondata

Persondata in wikipedia articles is deprecated (as of May 26, 2015) as all of the relevant biographical data has be captured by wikidata and the consensus is that all persondata should be removed from wikipedia articles. See Wikipedia:Persondata. There are a number of bots trawling through the biographical articles to remove persondata. You will also note that while previously persondata was invisible to the human viewers of wikipedia pages, it has now been made visible to assist editors to identify which pages still have the deprecated persondata, so that it can be removed. So I respectfully ask you not to reinstate Persondata to biographical articles where it has been removed and not to add it to new articles. Wayne Jayes (talk) 14:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

I didn't knew that. Thanks for explaining it.Mistico (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of newspapers in Angola page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

United Russia

Hi. You removed cited content from United Russia without so much as an edit summary, which I've reverted. Normally I issue a warning about this sort of thing if an IP or new user does it. I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but you have to know we typically expect edits to make sense. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello. If you read again you will see that I deleted a part of the text that I think was added recently that showed a massive POV against United Russia. Sorry, I should have explained the reasons of my edits.Mistico (talk) 02:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mistico. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Dorothy Day edits reverted, due to lack of neutral sources

When you are writing about such a sensitive topic, you must be especially careful to provide reliable sources, to preserve our neutral point of view. You may well be right in what you wrote about Day, but you have to provide more neutral sources, rather than the kind of extremely partisan publications you were drawing on. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I would suggest you go to Day's own 1973 article in Commonweal, which is falsified in the Aleteia article by substituting the peculiar phrase "artificial contraception" (one Day does not use anywhere in her article) for the phrase "birth control". (Excuse my ignorance; I gather that in some Catholic circles these phrases are considered interchangeable?) --Orange Mike | Talk 03:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes, artificial contraception and birth control are used as the same in Catholicism. The Catholic Church only subscrives to natural methods. Whats at stake is Dorothy Day support for the Catholic doctrine on the matter, after all the controversy that surrounded Pope Paul VI encyclica Humanae Vitae (1967). There is a very good biography of Dorothy Day by Jim Forest, and I will try to find her own words for the entry. Its true that she rarely spoke about these issues but her endorsement of the Catholic doctrine was known by anyone who knew her well.Mistico (talk) 00:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Heinrich Hoffmann (photographer)

Please stop attempting to downplay Hoffmann's position as Hitler's personal photographer, since it's what he's best known for. If it hadn't been for that, he'd just be another Nazi apparatchik. In fact, if he hadn't been Hitler's photographer, it's doubtful if he'd even be that. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Excuse me, but nobody is trying to downplay (sic) is role as Hitler's photographer. We all know that he is known for that. I was just trying to give the opening paragraph a more encyclopedic tone. For example, this is Pablo Picasso's opening paragraph: "Pablo Picasso (/pɪˈkɑːsoʊ, -ˈkæsoʊ/;[2] Spanish: [ˈpaβlo piˈkaso]; 25 October 1881 – 8 April 1973) was a Spanish painter, sculptor, printmaker, ceramicist, stage designer, poet and playwright who spent most of his adult life in France." It doesn't imediately claims that he was probably the most renowned painter of the 20th century. Mistico (talk) 23:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

The lede sentence of the lede paragraph should say, right up front, what the person is known for, not bury it at the end of a sentence with multiple clauses or put it in a following sentence. The tone is competely encyclopedic as it is. As for Picasso, it lists the many areas his talent was expressed in, rightfully so, whereas Hoffmann is almost entirely known as Hitler's photographer, the rest is just other stuff he did.

Please don't change it again without getting a consensus on the talk page to do so. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

I will leave the things as they are, but if you went to see the German Wikipedia article on him starts exactly the way I had intended to be in the English version. P.S. - My nick shows that I`m obviously a "he", while I didn`t took offense.Mistico (talk) 14:32, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maurício Abreu

A tag has been placed on Maurício Abreu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Seems like an article created for self promotion. No notability. No sources beyond subject's own

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~

I think it was a bad faith edit, since the person who does so seems to have done simply because he doesn`t know anything abourt Maurício Abreu. I wonder why Maurício Abreu seems to have a in long time a page at Portuguese Wikipédia and his conected to several leading names in Portuguese culture.Mistico (talk) 15:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mistico. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for inspiring me to create the page Musée Camille Claudel, something I've been meaning to do for many moons but never did. She is near the top of my list of favorite artists since I learned of her just a little more than a year ago. I'm glad you shook me out of complacency on this with your template edit. And of course, please, if you have the time, take a look at the page and improve what's now a stub. Images of her works held at the museum seem to be a good next step, among many. Thanks again! Randy Kryn (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

You`re welcome. She was truly a great sculptor, despite the fact that she is still much less known than Rodin and only about 90 of her works seems to have survived. I will do my best when I have the time, since I understand perfectly French.Mistico (talk) 01:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Invitation from Wikimedia Portugal

(English below)

Olá. A Wikimedia Portugal é uma associação portuguesa sem fins lucrativos, fundada em 2009, reconhecida pela Wikimedia Foundation como "chapter" de Portugal. A nossa missão é, em geral, contribuir para a disseminação generalizada do saber e da cultura, através do incentivo à recolha e criação de conteúdos isentos de restrições de utilização, modificação e distribuição, e da difusão dos mesmos; e em particular, promover e apoiar os projetos da Wikimedia Foundation, entre os quais a Wikipédia, com ênfase para os projetos nas línguas faladas em Portugal, o português e o mirandês.

Gostaríamos de contar com o apoio de (e reciprocamente apoiar) todos os voluntários naturais, residentes ou simplesmente interessados em Portugal. Embora fundada em 2009, a associação teve um largo período de inatividade, que estamos agora a ultrapassar. Vimos por isso convidá-lo, caso nisso tenha interesse, a inscrever-se como associado da associação, demonstrar apoio à existência de um "chapter" em Portugal, e a envolver-se em atividades futuras inscrevendo-se na lista de distribuição de email. Recentemente, a Comissão de Afiliações da Wikimedia suspendeu o apoio à Wikimedia Portugal, pendente, entre outras coisas, do apoio da comunidade de editores portugueses. [18]

Agradecemos desde já!

Hi! Wikimedia Portugal is the Portuguese chapter of Wikimedia, founded in 2009 and recognized by the Wikimedia Foundation. Our mission is to contribute to the general dissemination of knowledge and culture through the incentive to the collection and creation of content without restrictions on use, modification and distribution, and promote their difusion; we promote and support the Wikimedia Foundation projects, among which Wikipedia, with emphasis on projects in Portuguese and Mirandese.

We would like however to count on the support of (and in turn ourselves support) all volunteers that are citizens, resident, or simply interested in Portugal. Despite being founded in 2009, the chapter has gone through a long period of inactivity that we are trying to overcome. We have sent you this message to invite you, if you are interested, to enroll as associate to the chapter, demonstrate your support to the existence of a chapter in Portugal, and get involved in the discussion of future activities by registering in the mailing list. Recentely, the Wikimedia Affiliations Committee suspended support to Wikimedia Portugal pending, among other things, the support from the community of portuguese editors. [19] GoEThe (talk) 14:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Mexican artist navigation boxes

Thank you for creating the category, and I didn't realize it was new so I "jumped the gun" and added it to {{Frida Kahlo}}, should have let you do that. Nice work. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sofia Lisboa

The article Sofia Lisboa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 01:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sofia Lisboa. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Natureium (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Sofia Lisboa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

I would expect someone with 20k some-odd edits to know better than to edit war. I'd strongly advise you to redact your personal attack and discuss it on the talk page of the article since you've violated 3rr and WP:NPA. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:44, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

I am sorry. I was just trying to edit that article, when someone intervene. I am still editing. It can`t be helpful when we see users not helping but just trying to stop when we are working.Mistico (talk) 17:47, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

As indicated by the massive red and bold template on the page, BLPPROD isn't immediate, so there was absolutely no reason for you to edit war and be uncivil, especially given your tenure. "I didn't know" doesn't work like that and you've still not addressed your personal attack. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:50, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Like its said, its expected that others users help us when we are just trying to do our job. I have started hundreds in articles in Wikipedia, as you can see by yourself. I was expecting that user to start looking for RS, instead of trying to undo my job, and I lost my calm. I am very sorry.Mistico (talk) 17:55, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mistico reported by User:Natureium (Result: ). Thank you. Natureium (talk) 17:44, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

I have closed this as no action. As I said on the report, if you're having problems sourcing biographies of women, a note on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red works well. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

FYI

Thought you might find this link useful. - wolf 19:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Category:Anti-abortion organizations in Israel

As you created Category:Anti-abortion organizations in Israel, please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 September 7 #Category:Anti-abortion organizations in Israel. – Fayenatic London 21:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Olá!

I muat be one of the very few native English-speaking editors who has both translated from Portuguese Wikipedia into English Wikipedia and taken part in a pt:Wikipédia:Eliminação por consenso (a very minor part – I had alerted a pt:WP:ADMIN to a problem; and several native Portuguese-speaking editors did an excellent job – two articles written by a troll which had been deleted in English Wikipedia were deleted in Portuguese Wikipedia also).

Portuguese is about my sixth language, but Google Translate and low cunning are my friends. I cannot guarantee that I will agree with you in any particular case; but, you now know how to find me, and to ask.

(Bussaco 1810: Anglo-Lusitania 1-0 França) Narky Blert (talk) 22:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mistico. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Brussels International Catholic School

Seeing your experience in editing articles related to the Catholic Church and specifically to the ICRSS, would you be so kind as to edit and review the page User:Bicschoolbe/sandbox/Brussels International Catholic School ? Thank you. Bicschoolbe (talk) 09:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bangladeshi Anglicans

A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi Anglicans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bangladeshi Protestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi Protestants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gambian Anglicans

A tag has been placed on Category:Gambian Anglicans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Swazi Anglicans

A tag has been placed on Category:Swazi Anglicans indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Swazi Protestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Swazi Protestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Rui Costa (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rui Costa (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rui Costa (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Sidonie Rakotoarisoa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sidonie Rakotoarisoa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidonie Rakotoarisoa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:35, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cameroon Rugby Union.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cameroon Rugby Union.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 23 § Category:Anglican cathedrals by country

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 23 § Category:Anglican cathedrals by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anglican churches in Ghana

A tag has been placed on Category:Anglican churches in Ghana indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Giorgi Elizbarashvili for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgi Elizbarashvili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgi Elizbarashvili until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinadamina (talk) 19:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Otar Eloshvili for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Otar Eloshvili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otar Eloshvili until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinadamina (talk) 19:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Duarte Figueiredo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duarte Figueiredo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duarte Figueiredo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinadamina (talk) 19:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Silviu Florea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silviu Florea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silviu Florea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinadamina (talk) 19:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Gonçalo Foro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gonçalo Foro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonçalo Foro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinadamina (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Csaba Gál for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Csaba Gál is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Csaba Gál until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinadamina (talk) 18:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Diogo Gama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diogo Gama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diogo Gama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinadamina (talk) 18:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Revaz Gigauri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revaz Gigauri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revaz Gigauri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinadamina (talk) 18:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gediminas Marcišauskas

The article Gediminas Marcišauskas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT, Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C679 07:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American Polish National Catholics

A tag has been placed on Category:American Polish National Catholics indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)