User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 20

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Lea Lacroix (WMDE) in topic Wikidata weekly summary #230
Archive 15Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 25

Wikidata weekly summary #224

This Month in Education: [September 2016]





If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription.

We hope you enjoy the newest issue of the Education Newsletter.-- Sailesh Patnaik using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #225

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

This Month in GLAM: August 2016

 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #226

Infobox telescope

I noticed your edit to Template:Infobox telescope. This edit produces strange-looking results. The diameter (of the objective lens or mirror) is normally stated in inches for older optical telescopes (never feet and inches). For older radio telescopes the diameter of the main reflector is stated in feet (not feet and inches; usually the statements are not accurate to the inch so including inches would be false precision). For modern telescopes, both optical and radio, diameters are in meters. The template should not be converting inches to feet and inches, as it currently does for Hale telescope; the only conversions should be between American customary units and meters. The American customary unit for radio telescopes should be feet, and the American customary unit for optical telescopes should be inches. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Jc3s5h: Thanks for the heads-up about the issue. I think I've resolved it with this edit, which checks to see whether feet/inches/square inches are used rather than m/cm/sqm, and flips the conversion to convert to SI if needed. Does that look better to you now? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
It looks better for Hale Telescope. The modern large telescopes, where the diameter is usually designated in meters, all seem to have various notations and/or citations, which (properly) prevent the importation of Wikidata and hence avoid having your code apply to them.
It seems to work OK for South Pole Telescope using metres, so hopefully it'll work OK in the other articles when they're migrated. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:46, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
I argue that the customary American diameter of the South Pole Telescope should be give as 394 inches, to permit easier comparison to the diameter of older telescopes with well-known diameters in inches, such as the 200-inch Hale telescope or the 100-inch Hooker telescope. Jc3s5h (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #227

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Mike Peel. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

RfC on importing Wikidata information into Wikipedia observatory infoboxes

Please see the RfC Template talk:Infobox observatory#Comments on RfC: Satisfy verifiability related RfC? Jc3s5h (talk) 12:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #228

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

Wikidata weekly summary #229

Q42 listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Q42. Since you had some involvement with the Q42 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Orange Mike | Talk 22:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #230