MikeTheActuary

Where did you get the BDL passenger counts for 2009? Tofutwitch11 (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

They're ConnDOT stats, relayed via the BDL spotters' group mailing list. MikeTheActuary (talk) 03:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Do you think 2010 numbers will be up or down from 2009? Tofutwitch11 (talk) 11:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Looks like so far this year passenger counts are still down from 2009, in the high single digits. I'd assume that the decline will flatten as the year goes on, perhaps even start to turn upward. But that's pure guess on my part. MikeTheActuary (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

BDL Update Oct. 2010

Excellent Overhaul of BDL, seems you have done your research. :-) Tofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 13:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

BDL

That IP user 98.****** made edits that had to be reverted again! Im not sure what to do about this, but should we contact administrators? Tofutwitch11 (talk) 12:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MikeTheActuary. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Interstate 8

Sorry bout' the edits, it was me! Just doing some testing on Wikipedia's integrity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyilix (talk • contribs) 20:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Just undo the edit at 19:18, 26 March 2017‎ by Hyilix to solve every thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyilix (talk • contribs)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MikeTheActuary. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Interstate 269

The reason I keep rolling it back because it's the same issue, no official resigning of the freeway or nothing. It isn't signed, it isn't listed on TDOT's website as I-269, all we have is AASHTO, which doesn't mean it automatically starts because we have interstates that come years later after ruling. I keep hammering it in that there is no official documentation (i.e. DOT maps, press releases, reports) and no media sources (television or newspaper) backing the edits. --WashuOtaku (talk) 02:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

You obviously didn't read this or ignored it. --WashuOtaku (talk) 06:17, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Actually, I did read it. You apparently didn't read the comment I left on your page. TDOT is now referring to the stretching of road as I-269 officially. I shared a link to an example of such - the lane closure notice for the work to post the signs.

This is a different situation than I-840 in a couple of respects. TDOT actually wanted 840. They actually jumped the gun originally in referencing the highway as "interstate". It is for that reason that waiting for the federal approvals and waiting for the internal TDOT bureaucracy to work its magic was necessary before acknowledging the status change. Contrast that to 269, which has always been more of an MDOT project, at a time when TDOT funding was much leaner than the 840 days.

There is no guarantee that there will ever be a formal press release specifying the change. AASHTO has approved it. FHWA is crediting the miles for it. TDOT has just started referring to it as I-269 (rather than "SR 385 (future I-269)")

In a sense, as of 13 December 2017 (the first non-planning public reference by TDOT of "I-269 (redesignated SR 385)") I-269 is "more real" than I-69 is in Memphis. MikeTheActuary (talk) 20:47, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

That link you provided for your revert of my edit is incorrect. Have you ever been to the area? The county line is approx. 0.01 from the intersection. Please revert the edit back. --ACase0000 (talk) 21:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

I grew up in the area, and had the plans for TN 385 up on my bedroom walls for a few years while growing up (my father was an urban planner).  :)

The Shelby-Fayette county line runs in the I-269 right of way, east of the centerline from south of Exit 1 to Exit 2. The eastern ramps of Exit 1 are mostly in Fayette County. The county line passes through Exit 2, with the ramps between I-269 south and TN 385 west joining the 269 mainline in Shelby County, but the ramps between TN 385 / future I-269 north and 385 west joining the 269 mainline in Fayette County.

I linked to the Collierville zoning map as an example, as it's based on local GIS systems which are also linked to real estate and tax assessors data, and are about as definitive as one can get. The same guidance (with greater detail) can be found via Tennessee's assessors' records (http://tnmap.tn.gov/assessment/) and USGS data (https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/StagedProducts/Maps/USTopo/1/22632/7576464.pdf) MikeTheActuary (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

I am so sorry for all this confusion! I was thinking of the TN 385/TN 57 intersection. I am so sorry. I wasn't thinking straight. --ACase0000 (talk) 02:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

No worries! MikeTheActuary (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MikeTheActuary. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)