Merytat3n
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Your GA nomination of Bad Dürrenberg burial
editThe article Bad Dürrenberg burial you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bad Dürrenberg burial for comments about the article, and Talk:Bad Dürrenberg burial/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Bad Dürrenberg burial
editOn 6 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bad Dürrenberg burial, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Bad Dürrenberg shaman may have been able to block blood vessels to her brain by holding her head at certain angles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bad Dürrenberg burial. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bad Dürrenberg burial), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 15,517 views (646.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2024 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your work on this topic and congratulations on bringing the article to GA status. — AjaxSmack 04:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- You're most welcome and thank you! : D Merytat3n (talk) 10:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Tomb of Kha and Merit
editDear Merytat3n, first of al I apologize for the long delay in reviewing our article before your FAC. I now hav had time to read it and I see that it is very clearly of very high standard. I am confident this will be a FAC. There is litle to point out to improve. The coverage of the topic is thorough; the layout is good; style of references is perfect and their content too (a cursory look at JSTOR and common book sourcs confirms this). A few nitpicks:
Regarding alt text, is it always present except for one instance which you have forgotten (it is for File:Sarcofago interno di Merit mpi304930.tif wih caption "Merit's masked and partially shrouded mummy lying in her coffin trough") also to be on the safe side for the alts where you say "see caption" and "refer to caption" I suggest you really write an alt or copy the caption (this is ok for me but sometimes weird things get raised at FAC).
I noticed that none of the caption have references, I think this is ok for most but I would feel more secure if you could find a ref confirming the TT8 Plan picture because it was uploaded as "own work" by a wikicommons user. If you know a book/article displaying a similar plan you could had its reference there. Iry-Hor (talk) 08:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Iry-Hor, thank you so much for looking over the article! No need to apologise for the delay, we all have real life to contend with. Thank you for your kind words about the article : )
- Thank you for finding the alt I forgot and for your advice. I have done as you suggested and replaced any instances of "see caption" or similar with alt text.
- I have added a ref for the chapel plan. It seems to be based on the plan given in Porter and Moss (1960). Merytat3n (talk) 03:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Put it up at FAC whenever you feel ready and expect to have wiki time available and it should go very well. FAC is always a very long process and you will certainly have to do tweaks following suggestions. Expect:
- i) to see a long time elapse between putting the article up and the end of the FAC process when your article is (hopefully) promoted (this can easily take 2/3 months);
- ii) to have to respond to lots of little thing notably about phrasing or technical points (overall try to implement as many changes as possible, if you feel like something proposed is not acceptable, explain why to the reviewer);
- iv) try to answer reviews relatively quickly (hence put at FAC when you expect to have wiki time);
- iii) possibly not seeing enough reviews (if so then we can agitate people in the Ancient Egypt Wikiproject to have enough reviewers). I will also drop by to add a support, I am going on vacations but will post a support at some point in August if I see the article in FAC.
Keep in mind that before promotion your article will also receive: an image review checking that all employed pictures have the required copyrights (you may have to edit some wikicommons data to update incorrect copyrights, or in the wose case scenario, removing a picture or pick an alternative one) and a source review and spotcheck (randomly selected references will be reviewed for their formatting, quality and accuracy with respect to the text). Oh and by the way, I think you really did an outstanding job on this! Iry-Hor (talk) 17:21, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the very helpful rundown of what to expect! I will probably put in through in the next week or so. I feel I have just been moving words around on the page without making any real improvements for a while so there is no real reason to delay it ^_^; I expect to have a bit of downtime in early August (small vacation) but I will have internet access and I will bring the physical sources with me. Thank you again for your generous assistance! Merytat3n (talk) 21:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article TT1 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
The article TT1 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:TT1 and Talk:TT1/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 18:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
The article TT1 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:TT1 for comments about the article, and Talk:TT1/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)