McJeff

Help request

{{Admin help}} I have identified what I believe is another ECW500 sockpuppet, but there are two concerns I have that prevent me from filing another checkuser. One, is that a checkuser was run recently and did not pick it up. The second, which ties to the first, is that if I were to post my evidence on wiki, he would be able to alter his behavior to avoid detection. There's one particular smoking gun that I absolutely do not want to state publicly. Would it be possible for a checkuser with time on his hands or an administrator familiar with ECW500 - or preferably, someone who's both - give me a way to contact him off wiki? Failing that, could someone instruct me on how I would go about presenting private evidence related to sockmasters to the appropriate authority? McJEFF ^(talk) 23:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

I think your best bet is to contact an active CU directly via email or to send a message to the mailing list. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote

Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, McJeff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)