♀This user is female.
This user is interested in history.
This user is interested in women's and gender history.
This user is interested in
ancient civilizations.
This user supports the LGBTQ+ community and being queer.






Welcome!

edit
 
CaptainEek here, welcoming you aboard the SS Wikipedia! May your WikiJourney take you great places  

Welcome to Wikipedia, MaysinFourty! Thank you for your contributions. I'm CaptainEek and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. I am always willing to help folks out! You can also check out the friendly Teahouse to ask any questions you might have. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Smooth sailing, CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your welcome, CaptainEek! MaysinFourty (talk) 07:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikhil Deogun has been accepted

edit
 
Nikhil Deogun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 18:42, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Stuartyeates! MaysinFourty (talk) 08:08, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit
 

Hello MaysinFourty. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MaysinFourty. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MaysinFourty|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dear Cyphoidbomb, this is to declare in response to your message that I have no conflict of interest, and have never been compensated for my work on Wikipedia; I create articles on things that interest me, or in the most recent case, Serendipity Arts Festival, have personally attended... MaysinFourty (talk) 15:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bhagavadajjukam

edit

On 10 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bhagavadajjukam, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 7th-century drama Bhagavadajjukam is the earliest-surviving satirical play in Sanskrit literature? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bhagavadajjukam. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bhagavadajjukam), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

You are an undisclosed paid editor[1] so better know your limits instead of violating BLP any further. 42.106.5.240 (talk) 05:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Who are you? What are you talking about? Go away SPAMMER! MaysinFourty (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
"Who are you?" Do you expect me to be some popular phenomenon like Superman that everyone (including paid editors like you) should know? Better don't. 42.106.5.240 (talk) 05:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply