Matt 14

Welcome!

Hello, Matt 14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Bubba hotep 20:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

April 2007

Hello! Please do not change the genres of albums, songs, or bands until a consensus has been made on the talk page, as you did to Dookie, American Idiot (album), Kerplunk!, Warning:, and many many more[1][2][3][4][5][6]. It is considered vandalism. Please consider this a first warning. Thank you for understanding!--JUDE ^talk 17:58, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Direction(The starting line album)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Direction(The starting line album), by Chochopk, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Direction(The starting line album) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Direction(The starting line album), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Direction(The starting line album) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:19, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Genres and formatting

Hi there. Regarding changes like this, please note that WP:ALBUM#Details says to use commas to delimit genres. Further note that according to WP:MUSTARD#Capitalization most genres should not be capitalized. Have a nice day. --PEJL 16:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Just a reminder (regarding this change). --PEJL 17:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

100 Million

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article 100 Million, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. J Milburn 12:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Activate song

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Activate song, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your opinion, Matt. Please read Wikipedia:Notability. Deb 18:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Adam Agee

A tag has been placed on Adam Agee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 12:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Adam Agee

A tag has been placed on Adam Agee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 12:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Punctuation

Hi there, please remember to use proper punctuation. Band names, proper nouns etc are capitalised. Also, don't be afraid to wiki link to existing articles. On another note, please only include content that is encyclopedic. Sentences such as "adam mentions that he owns a dog and talks about it", and "he often has a spiky hair style and it seen in different videos by the group and in many photos." are not encyclopedic and will be deleted. Cheers and happy editing. Nouse4aname 14:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of This is who we are

A tag has been placed on This is who we are, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Pumpmeup 08:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

You're Only Young Once

I see you have created the page You're Only Young Once. If you do not know how to capitalize titles, then do not create pages on Wikipedia. You're only young once is not correct and it is basic second grade grammar to capitalize ALL the major words in a title. Wikipedia looks for people who know at least basic English grammar and spelling. If you do not, please don't create any more pages. Thank you. Tim Y (talk) 13:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Again, you created the article "This is who we are", with completely incorrect capitalisation. The correct capitalisation relates to a completely different article. Your punctuation in the article body itself is also appalling. I have told you about this before, and you seem to be ignoring any request to improve your articles. In future, use the "show preview" button first, then identify what needs to be ammended. Cheers Nouse4aname 07:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Tags

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. shoy 16:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Breathe you in. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. shoy 16:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Breathe you in. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. shoy 16:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article, as you did with Breathe you in, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. shoy 16:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Breathe you in, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. shoy 16:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Capitalisation. Again.

I am getting tired of having to revert so many of you edits that introduce incorrectly capitalised words into articles. Once or twice is fine, but your continued inability to use correct English is getting disruptive. If you do not know how to contribute properly, perhaps you should brush up on some basic English before doing so again. Use the Show Preview button to see the effect your changes will have. Nouse4aname 10:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Are you ignoring my advice on purpose? What is wrong with you? Learn some basic English. Don't edit again until you do. It is "Your Guardian Angel" NOT "Your guardian Angel". Get it right. Nouse4aname 08:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Citation Requests

Please do not remove citation requests, which look like this - , from articles. Your recent edit to Ohio Is for Lovers has been identified as vandalism and has been reverted. Tim Y (talk) 21:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Matt 14: You seem to have a real problem with listening to people when they are trying to help you, I am not sure why this is. When someone tags an article with {{cn}} or another citation needed tag, they are not there for decoration. They are there because a source is needed to back up the claims. You often remove such tags from explanations of lyrics. Now as lyrics are entirely open to interpretation, you need to provide the source where the lyricist or at least the band explain what the lyrics mean. If you cannot do this, then we cannot be sure that is what the lyrics mean. Do not remove citation requests in future. Nouse4aname 08:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

The Red Jumpsuit Apparatus

Please don't add a genre designation to the first line of the text. This has become a battleground for genre warriors, and I'd like to avoid that by shunting all the genres into the infobox and citing the daylights out of them. Hopefully I can keep that a consensus until the article's popularity dies down. Chubbles 17:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Panic! at the Disco

You have removed sourced genres from Panic! at the Disco twice after being told it was wrong. You cannot just delete valid sourced information and put up what you think is right. The genres listed in the article have been agreed on after a long discussion. Please do not change them or I will have to start giving you vandalism warnings. Tim Y (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Matthew Steel

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Noah 23:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Matthew Steel

A tag has been placed on Matthew Steel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Exxolon 17:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of We Say Recess

A tag has been placed on We Say Recess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 17:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of We Say Recess

A tag has been placed on We Say Recess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ViperSnake151 17:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

STOP!

|

Stop recreating the Matthew Steel article - this person does NOT meet our criteria for an article. You've just recreated the article after TWO speedy deletions - do not re-create it again. Also DO NOT remove speedy deletion tags from articles you've created. If you continue in this manner you may well be BLOCKED from editing. Exxolon 18:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Genres

You have added the "genre" Christian" to a number of articles recently. As you should be aware, Christian is not a musical genre; Christian rock, Christian metal etc etc however are. Please stop changing genres. Thank you Nouse4aname 08:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Panic! at the Disco Genre

Please stop changing the Panic! at the Disco genre to rock from alternative rock. This genre has been agreed upon after much discussion on the talk page. If you change it again, I will have to start giving you block warnings. ╦ﺇ₥₥€Ԋ (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I see that I have warned you before and you ignored me completely. What is your problem? You're getting warnings now.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Panic! at the Disco, you will be blocked from editing. ╦ﺇ₥₥€Ԋ (talk) 19:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Genre Changes

Please stop changing the genres on every article you edit. You are not the authority on genres, and just because you are of the opinion the genre is wrong, does not allow you to change them. For the most part, genres are a rather contentious issue, and have usually been decided on by consensus. Your edits undermine this consensus and completely spoil the experience of wikipedia for everyone. If you want to change the genres, do so by first suggesting the change on the talk page (after checking any archive discussions first, to ensure the same discussion has not already occurred). Only after it has been discussed can the genre then be changed. Obvious vandalism is obviously the exception here. In addition, for album infoboxes, guidlines suggest that genres are separated by commas, and not line breaks. Please try to remember this to ensure consistency throughout wikipedia. Cheers. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

capitals please

Look, I have asked politely many times before. Please ensure that your contributions use correct English spelling and punctuation. If you cannot do this, then you really shouldn't be contributing until you learn it. You have created the categories Stellar kart songs and Stellar kart albums; Stellar Kart is the name of a band, and thus is capitalised. Please remember this. Someone has to go around after you cleaning up your edits. WP:MOS. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Catergories

I have seen that you are adding the Category 2000s singles/ 2000s songs/ 2000s albums etc to many articles. Please don't. The articles only belong to the category of the specific year they were released. The category 2000s singles for example should only include the sub categories 2001 singles, 2002 singles...2008 singles ( up to 2009 singles in the future). Each of these sub categories then contains the relevant songs. Cheers Nouse4aname (talk) 09:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

How many times must you be told. Do not add the following categories to articles:

• 2000s singles
• 2000s albums
• 2000s songs
• 1990s singles
• 1990s songs
• 1990s albums

These are simply used to collect the actual categories of, for example, 2001 singles, 2002 singles, 2003 singles etc

Please stop adding these categories to articles. I have asked politely, and in future you will be receiving warnings each time you ignore advice. If you continue editing in this way, you will soon be blocked. Please stop spoiling the experience for everyone else. Nouse4aname (talk) 13:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

See here for an explanation. As all these articles already have the categroy for the specific year, for example 2001 albums, they do not also need to be included in the category 2000s albums. I hope that explains it. Nouse4aname (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

In addition... the categories American musical groups and musical groups are also redundant. These are simply parent categories that house the sub categories, for example, american punk bands etc. The categories should be as specific as possible. Not broad such as these. Please only stick to the specific categories. Over the coming weeks I plan to overhaul these categories, so don't be surprised to see them dissappear from the pages. Don't be tempted to add them back. Nouse4aname (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Hawthorne Heights

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 15:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Dead Star/In Your World

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Chubbles (talk) 19:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

You're All I Have

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Chubbles (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block.

-- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 19:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I've now blocked you indefinitely. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 23:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Pandora (song)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Pandora (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Boyband(song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Boyband(song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Boyband(song). Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Acoustic music albums

I have nominated Category:Acoustic music albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of I Wanna Live

The article I Wanna Live has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song. No sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Definitely Maybe (song)

The article Definitely Maybe (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of To the core

The article To the core has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article on song fails WP:NSONG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vrac (talk) 17:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Letters to the President (song)

The article Letters to the President (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Here I Stand (Madina Lake song)

The article Here I Stand (Madina Lake song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 10:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Almost Here (The Academy Is song)

The article Almost Here (The Academy Is song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable...an interesting composition and a few game appearances doesn't qualify its notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. dannymusiceditor ^oops 18:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC)