First of all, sorry for my horrible english, I'm not a nativ speaker. But I wonder why every list now has this "This is a list with no clear inclusion or exclusion criteria" component. Everything that was wirtten their was part of several episodes and was clearly named in their. If you watch the episodes, you will know that everything that was written there is true. Why does it need citation? I don't get that.... For me, the claim about the citation is nonsens. You also don't have to prove everything if you write the summary of one episode because to prove that it is right, you only have to watch the corresponding episode. --Martina2504 (talk) 10:31, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry I don't really know why, and I'm not a native American either. I'd say the stated inclusion criterion is clear, and obviously a recording verifies the facts of its own content (as do all sorts of self-publishing facts such as an enormous building)! Commonsense often prevails, in practice. However, maybe the Wikipedia:No original research policies prefer Verifiability from secondary published sources (such as some idiotic website)? Jezza (talk) 00:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Start a discussion with Martina2504
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Martina2504. What you say here will be public for others to see.
