Your submission at Articles for creation: Verónica Arias has been accepted

edit
 
Verónica Arias, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 11:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luz del Alba Jiménez has been accepted

edit
 
Luz del Alba Jiménez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 14:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Edona Bilali

edit

Hello, Quackgates,

Thank you for creating Edona Bilali.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The second reference doesn't mention her education, it only states she was appointed minister

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 15:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

!Welcoming other users

edit

You do not have enough experience to Welcome new users. You should never welcome users who have not yet made contributions. Please stop.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Bora Muzhaqi

edit

Hello, Quackgates,

Thank you for creating Bora Muzhaqi.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more information to satisfy NPOLITICIAN. Information about the election of this person is necessary. Supply additional references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

A bowl of strawberries for you!

edit
  Hi thanks for creating Pierre Chirac which I’ve just reviewed. Please don’t use machine translations on Wikipedia as they are full of stupid mistakes. Also you need to give attribution to the original article. Was this translated from fr.wiki or de.wiki? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 14:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Francois Chicoyneau

edit

Hello, Quackgates,

Thank you for creating Francois Chicoyneau.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The content in this article address this person's parents and siblings and nobility. They do not address the biography of the person.

More sources are needed. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability.

  1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
  2. Be completely independent of the article subject.
  3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
  4. Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.

Given the mandatory requirements of WP:NBIO rendered above, the references in this article do not address the biography of this person. We don't need who his parents or siblings were. Kindly attend to the matters above, else the article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Guillaume Desnoues

edit

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from fr.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. If you can confirm whether material for this article was translated I’ll add the template to the talk page for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 13:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Malachi Benson (talk) 08:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Théodore Baron d'Hénouville

edit

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from fr.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve add the template to the talk page for you and you can copy it for future articles you create. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 07:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Translating articles

edit

Properly crediting your sources when you translate material to create a new article isn’t optional. It’s a requirement for copyright reasons. Please make it part of your routine. Mccapra (talk) 09:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Jean-Baptiste Bassand

edit

Hi. Could you please consider returning to the page you created at Jean-Baptiste Bassand and addressing the tagged issues and removing the dead links and any content that is supported by them. If you need help, you are welcome to ask at the Teahouse. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Stefano Cilio

edit

Hello, Malachi Benson, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Curbon7, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Stefano Cilio, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano Cilio (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Curbon7}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Curbon7 (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hendrik du Toit moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Hendrik du Toit. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Currently not indication of significance.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creepTalk 18:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Hendrik du Toit

edit

  Hello, Malachi Benson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hendrik du Toit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hendrik du Toit

edit
 

Hello, Malachi Benson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hendrik du Toit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply