MJC8104

Welcome MJC8104!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,315,570 registered editors!

Hello MJC8104. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool!   Do maintain a neutral point of view   Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:   Fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Help contribute to articles   Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you   Help design new templates   Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

• Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
• Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
  

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

• Español
• Deutsch
• Français
• Italiano
• עברית
• Русский
• 日本語
• Polski
• فارسی

Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, MJC8104. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page User talk:Walter Görlitz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

The content in the article is now correctly sourced. WP:PRIMARY sources are immaterial and WP:NOTADVERTIZING play-in here. How the band wants to portray themselves has been noted but reviewers' interpretations of their genres are more important. If you'd like to discuss this on the article's talk page, feel free to, but use WP:SECONDARY sources to support the genre claims. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for responding and the links you provided. I understand now and will work to provide proper sources in the future.MJC8104 (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VERIDIA Numb Single Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VERIDIA Numb Single Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Veridia Summer Sessions Vol 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Veridia Summer Sessions Vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey

What you did right: including content from the reviews of the song. This shows notability.

What you did wrong: including so much content from the reviews of the song. That gets close to violating copyright. Delete about 3/4 of the content from the reviews; use only selected phrases. DS (talk) 01:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the feedback. Where did I use too much content so I can correct it? Thanks againMJC8104 (talk) 03:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Here, I did it for you. Consider also how I quoted reviews in the articles on "Painted" and "Periodically Double or Triple". DS (talk) 05:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

I thought it was ok to quote as long as I gave proper credits and added as a reference. I understand now and will see to quote less in the future, picking certain phrases and not using entire paragraphs. I greatly appreciate your help and guidance. MJC8104 (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

CoI?

You declared a connection, but have not stated what that connection is. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey Walter Görlitz. What else should I declare? I can't find additional fields within the template Connected Contributor to state what the connection is. MJC8104 (talk) 21:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest explains it, specifically at WP:DISCLOSE where it discusses the "UserboxCOI template", but only if you want to be outed that way. The thing is it's not clear what your CoI is so that's what I was trying to determine. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Walter Görlitz I understand now. Thank you. I added the template below the welcome section. I hope that clears up any CoI. It was recommended that I add it, by an Admin, when I told them that I have hung out with the band pre/post shows. I am not an employee, received/receiving payment or affiliated with them in any way. I guess I'm just a huge fan. MJC8104 (talk) 03:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

I believe you made a similar comment on the band article's talk page. I'm not sure being a fan is a CoI though, even one who follows the band closely. We have some serious fans of U2 who edit those articles and I'm sure super-fans of other artists do it on those articles. As long as you don't try to push the band's own point of view when editing, and stick to reliable sources, I think it would be safe to remove the CoI template on the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Walter Görlitz. I'll go ahead and remove it. I just wanted to make sure I was following all the rules. MJC8104 (talk) 18:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)