User talk:LuK3/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Feedback Dashboard task force
Hi Lukep913,
I noticed you replied to some feedback from the new Feedback Dashboard feature – you might be interested in the task force Steven Walling and I just created for this purpose: Wikipedia:Feedback Dashboard. Thanks for diving in on your own and helping the newbies, and I hope you'll sign up! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thanks for the answer and more puntual question
http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/History about this page...people cannot edit it fine...but there is a big mistake! the page says on the right:
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." —Carlos Santana
...as in the references the quote is from George Santayana not Carlos Santana the rock dude a guy posted it on the discussion page the 7th of november but still no reply! and is the "history" page of wiki... how is it possibile to gain attention on matters as such? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niccolo.beduschi (talk • contribs) 02:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- I changed the link. As for the talk pages of articles, usually people who regularly edit the article watch the talk page. If something is wrong, you can either edit it yourself or ask another user that is active in the particular article topic to help you. -- Luke (Talk) 02:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello. You have a new message at Steven (WMF)'s talk page. 04:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Input requested
WT:New editor feedback#Proposed office hours. Thanks, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
your corrections
My user name does not have to do with nature and what I put is true — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omworkclub (talk • contribs) 02:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Raimee naidoo
You beat me to that one by seconds...— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. -- Luke (Talk) 03:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello Friends
This is my first visit, Greetings and Best wishes to all of you for the GLORY and SUCCESS of Wikipedia for your sincere contributions and untiring efforts. Cheers ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maahole (talk • contribs) 05:46, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Tried to leave Talkback > confused
Sigh. I am a smart person. WiKi is foreign language to me. I tried to follow steps for leaving "talkback" memo. Too complicated for me to follow. Sorry. Hope this accomplishes same task, albeit differently. (And, conveys new info!) Oops, but the other one lets me delete it. This one may not? Workaround? Also, is there a Wiki-edit Glossary? (albeit lengthy). e.g., I presume I know what you mean by "revert" - But, that's an intuitive guess. It would be better to have ability to verify my assumption.KnowLimits (talk) 13:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Trivia Section for College Gameday Article
I was wondering, should we start a Trivia Section in the College Gameday article? I know you deleted the section about Lee Corso's "expletive" incident, but there are other significant events that happened in College Gameday throughout the time. So it should be wise to start a new section in the article. Bentoman (talk) 05:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hello Bentoman. I'm not very keen on Trivia sections in articles. According to WP:TRIVIA, information not a part of any other section should be added in an organized way. After a while, when there is more information added, it gets more disorganized and more harder to read. Try reading these steps on how to integrate information into articles. Thanks for messaging me. -- Luke (Talk) 12:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Your edit? Someone else adding your signature to an edit?
I am puzzled by this edit which appears to be signed by you but which appears to have been posted by another. Was it your intent to award that editor a barnstar? Thanks. Edison (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's odd. I don't recall giving that user a barnstar. According to that diff, he added it and for some reason it put my signature on it. -- Luke (Talk) 20:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Accountcreator
Hello Lukep913, since you are highly active on the account creation interface, I have enabled accountcreator on your account. This will enable you to ignore the normal limit on daily account creations and other checks. Please take note of the following points:
- This permission does not give you any special status or authority.
- Be sure that the conflicting account is inactive when overriding the spoofing check.
- Creation of inappropriate accounts or pages may lead to its removal.
- Disruptive editing of edit notices may lead to its removal
- You can display the
{{Accountcreator topicon}}
top icon or the{{User wikipedia/accountcreator}}
userbox on your user page. - If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it.
- If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask me. Otherwise, happy editing! Salvio Let's talk about it! 17:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Salvio! Greatly appreciated. -- Luke (Talk) 17:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Luke, please see this request and my comments there. I realise this was your first 'flagged user' request but you handled it incorrectly. The requested username was free on enwiki (and on all wikis) and it was the conflicting username that had accounts at enwiki and mlwiki (both of which were inactive, therefore the account creation could proceed). You also sent a custom close to the user (which you did not sign with your Wikipedia username as you should have) and custom closing is not the standard procedure in these situations.
I would urge you to please re-read the Account Creation Guide, especially the section on similar account names (4.1) before you handle any other 'flagged user' requests. It is very important. Also remember that you should always always sign your custom closes with your name and if you ever need help or are unsure how to handle a request, you can always click on the "Chat" link at the top of the interface to ask advice from other ACC users, or leave it for somebody else. Please make sure you understand where you went wrong with all the points I've mentioned above and you can ask me if you're not sure. Regards. Mato (talk) 19:44, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- One last thing. If you haven't already done so, please subscribe to the Account Creation Mailing List. It is a mailing list for tool users to see custom closes that have been sent and to discuss any issues via email. Mato (talk) 19:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Take a look at my comments there. That was an obvious UPol; what did you think you had seen when you checked the links? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hello Hi878. I didn't mean to put in the whois into the comment. I meant the Google search. They're some companies with the similar names like "Las Vegas Vip". I was 99% positive to close it as a UPol violation, however I wanted another user to verify it was indeed a UPol violation. -- Luke (Talk) 02:39, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- I apologize if I sound at all rude, but your comment says the opposite. You said that the name was fine, and you were worried about the e-mail. Are you saying that you were wrong about that in the comment, or have I misunderstood you? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- You don't sound rude at all, my comment was wrong, I'm sorry about that. -- Luke (Talk) 02:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll leave you alone now. :) Just wanted to make sure I had everything right. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- It's fine, thanks for replying. Have a good day. -- Luke (Talk) 02:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll leave you alone now. :) Just wanted to make sure I had everything right. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- You don't sound rude at all, my comment was wrong, I'm sorry about that. -- Luke (Talk) 02:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- I apologize if I sound at all rude, but your comment says the opposite. You said that the name was fine, and you were worried about the e-mail. Are you saying that you were wrong about that in the comment, or have I misunderstood you? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[Moved to userpage]
- Thanks NellieBly! Much appreciated. -- Luke (Talk) 02:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi, Luke. I appreciate your taking care of business on my user talk. See ya 'round Tiderolls 05:56, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- No problem Tide rolls, glad I can help. -- Luke (Talk) 12:29, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Why????????
Why did you revert my post on Admiral Zheng He????? At lease put the ones back that didn't have the world hell in them! Bob Toggaf (talk) 02:44, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Bob Toggaf
- Your edits count as vandalism, which I reverted. -- Luke (Talk) 02:48, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Feedback Dashboard upgrade
Hi Lukep913,
Thanks for signing up for the Feedback Dashboard response team! I wanted to let you know that the tool just got an important update (see here for details). I also wanted to invite you to the IRC office hours session that Steven and I are going to hold this Sunday, December 4. Hope you can make it and share your experience/questions with us! Thanks again, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
A7 and universities
Schools do not fall under A7. Thanks. →Στc. 21:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- My mistake, didn't mean to file it under A7, only G3. Thanks for fixing it. -- Luke (Talk) 21:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A barnstar for you!
[Moved to userpage]
- Glad to help WBJ! Happy editing! -- Luke (Talk) 22:40, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you Luke, for the pat on the back. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, hope you do well as an admin. -- Luke (Talk) 12:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Welcoming you to the participants list on AfC!
Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Articles for creation! We are a group of editors who work together on the Articles for creation and Images for upload pages.
A few tips that you might find helpful:
- Please take time to fully read the reviewers' instructions before reviewing submissions.
- The project's discussion board is the best place to ask for help or advice. You might like to watchlist this page, and you are encouraged to take part in any discussion that comes up.
- Article submissions that need reviewing can be found in Category:Pending AfC submissions and there is also a useful list which is maintained by a bot.
- You might wish to add {{AFC status}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. There is also a project userbox. If you haven't done so already, please consider adding your name to the list of participants.
- Several of our members monitor the #wikipedia-en-help connect IRC channel, and you are welcome to join in to ask Wikipedia-related questions.
- The IRC channel #wikipedia-en-afc connect is used occasionally for internal discussion regarding the Articles for Creation process, and also serves as a recent changes feed, displaying all edits made in the Articles for Creation namespace.
Once again, welcome to the project. Mediation4u (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
I find the box above useful for AfC quick links. Hope this helps, Mediation4u (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC) editing is fun
Talkback
Message added 17:26, 10 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Template question
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I need some help with templates. I'm using the template {{birth year and age}} because the subject's exact birth date is unknown. I need to put in the person's death, which was on December 8th. I tried using the {{Death date and age}}, however I need to add the exact birthday. Is there a way to put the death without the exact birth date? -- Luke (Talk) 21:09, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Have you tried
{{BirthDeathAge}}
? I've never used it, but its documentation leads me to think that it will do what you want. —DoRD (talk) 03:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
the lie
i am not the creator of tim pie dawson i am tim pie dawson the creaor is a connor shannon and i removed the deletion because it is true. ALL OF IT. so if you want to argue then all you are doing is making fun of me and my other cyberfish buddies. my deformaty is nothing to laugh about. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. TH3TBO (tim pie dawson) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TH3TB0 (talk • contribs) 13:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Removing speedy deletion templates is not allowed, even if you are the creator of the article or not. -- Luke (Talk) 13:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Please stop randomly reverting my edits
Please stop reverting my edits on Wikipedia for no reason at all, as you did at User talk:R000t 83.245.228.162 (talk) 15:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Your edits are considered vandalism, therefore I reverted them. -- Luke (Talk) 15:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
My edits were definitely not vandalism 83.245.228.162 (talk) 15:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Please explain why you are calling them vandalism 83.245.228.162 (talk) 15:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- They are vandalism. Replacing content on user talk pages with repeated characters is considered vandalism and repeated vandalism will result in a block. Period. TBloemink talk 15:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Just a note: this IP-address above is now globally blocked because of crosswiki-vandalism and being an tor exit node (see here). Wiki13 (talk) 15:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I reported the IP. -- Luke (Talk) 15:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- If he's blocked globally, that prevents him from editing here. Kuru (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, it doesn't show any entry in the block log. That's why. -- Luke (Talk) 15:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not a problem; there are several types of blocks that don't show up in the block log. You can see this one when you click on the little "current blocks" tag from their contribution list. That link will also show rangeblocks. :) Kuru (talk) 23:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, it doesn't show any entry in the block log. That's why. -- Luke (Talk) 15:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- If he's blocked globally, that prevents him from editing here. Kuru (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I reported the IP. -- Luke (Talk) 15:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Just a note: this IP-address above is now globally blocked because of crosswiki-vandalism and being an tor exit node (see here). Wiki13 (talk) 15:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Walking Dead (TV series)
The article The Walking Dead (TV series) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven ten days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Walking Dead (TV series) for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! I responded at the Talk Page (Talk:Murder of Deriek Crouse). Thank you. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC))
- My pleasure. -- Luke (Talk) 02:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Reactions article
Thanks for the note and your good work on this article. Will add new reactions direct to your draft as I come across them. Its up to you but Id maybe wait a few weeks per Rangoon's comments. FeydHuxtable (talk) 19:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- You're quite welcome and thank you for your comment. I'll take his advice and wait and develop the article. Happy Holidays! -- Luke (Talk) 20:22, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, think youre the first Wikipedian to wish me that. Best festive wishes to you too! FeydHuxtable (talk) 20:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
QUESTION ABOUT TOKYOGIRL79
Why is this person allowed to harass contributors. She has made it a personal vendetta to delete EVERYTHING I post, despite the fact it is well sourced. Please remove her from her evil powers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.132.236 (talk) 03:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see any evidence of her being uncivil, can you care to show me diffs? -- Luke (Talk) 03:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar for you!
[Moved to user page]
- Thanks for the barnstar Tokyogirl. Happy holidays! -- Luke (Talk) 16:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Don't delete my page!
It is helpful to users and non-users! Just add a little more info and bam! A good article! WebTV3 (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hello WebTV, here is a page for redlinks already established. Plus, there is no reason that is should be in the mainspace. Hope this helps. -- Luke (Talk) 17:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- OK. Can I have the honor of deleting it? An expert of the world known as WebTV3! (talk) 17:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I requested deletion according to G7. Only administrators can delete pages. They will delete it soon. -- Luke (Talk) 17:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- How do I become an administrator? An expert of the world known as WebTV3! (talk) 18:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and/or Happy New Year
How do I change my user name to something more "usable"?
Should I just abandon it and start over?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdminEdit (talk • contribs) 18:35, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- I would think that changing your username would be easier to something not misleading, offensive, or promotional in nature. -- Luke (Talk) 18:39, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 31 December 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: Joliesse
Hello Lukep913. I am just letting you know that I deleted Joliesse, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Tagged the article for A7 and G11, thanks. ;) -- Luke (Talk) 04:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Knicks task force
Talkback
Message added 05:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Knicks task force welcome
Hi, and welcome to the New York Knicks task force! We are a group of (mainly) Knicks fans who help to improve coverage related to the New York Knicks on Wikipedia.
Looking for somewhere to start? Here is a few suggestions.
- You can check out topics on the main page.
- You can add
{{WikiProject NBA|Knicks-task-force=yes}}
to talk pages of New York Knicks-related articles, and assess them as well. - Check out the to do list for the task force, and opt to try and complete some of those tasks.
If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.
Happy New Year! NYCRuss ☎ 15:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of BWiser/CC Article
A tag has been placed on BWiser/CC Article requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk page from the article space.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ankit Maity Talk • contribs 16:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for tagging it. I just moved that userspace draft from the mainspace a couple of minutes ago. -- Luke (Talk) 16:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Hoaxes
Please keep in mind that violations of WP:MADEUP do not qualify as hoaxes for the sake of the G3 speedy deletion criteria. There has never been any consensus for the speedy deletion of stuff that kids invent on the spur of the moment. Please use proposed deletion on such occurrences. Thank you. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. I will keep my eye out next time. -- Luke (Talk) 03:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Articles for Creation Appeal
Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2350 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. |
A barnstar for you!
[Moved to userpage]
- Aw thanks Feyd, much appreciated! -- Luke (Talk) 21:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
You've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
SarahStierch (talk) 20:36, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hey Sarah, I got your e-mail. I'll be applying shortly. Thanks! -- Luke (Talk) 21:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the official welcome Luke. I've been a registered user on Wikipedia since 2007 but I rarely edit pages or participate in talk pages. That being said, it might explain my lack of proper formatting techniques. Thank you for the tips, and the cookies!
- No problem Dusty! If you have any questions, feel free to ask here or at the Help Desk. -- Luke (Talk) 03:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Re:DYK question
Hi, any articles which have been featured on In the News are ineligible to appear in DYK. There was nothing wrong with your nomination, it was just that the article was ineligible. Miyagawa (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Cleanup invitation
I've formatted the WikiProject Cleanup page to include members for those that are interested in joining, similar to how other projects have members. Since you've contributed relatively recently to the project's list page, I formally extend this invitation to join WikiProject Cleanup! I've also created a userbox template for members to use on their user pages. Thank you for your contributions to help improve Wikipedia! Northamerica1000(talk) 08:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Note about userpage
Hey. Just a note that to comply with the CC-BY 2.0 license that the image on your user page is licensed by, I am pretty sure that you must link to the image itself to comply, or provide attribution on your user page. Cheers! Ramaksoud2000 (Did I make a mistake?) 02:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed – thanks for letting me know, my mistake. -- Luke (Talk) 02:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry about that
Sorry you posted the stats to the wrong page. As I just posted on User talk:Eagles247 I didn't spot that mistake seeing as how it didn't effect the displayed text. Dpmuk (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- That's quite fine, I posted the stats at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Dpmuk. Thanks for reminding me. I wish you luck in the RfA! -- Luke (Talk) 03:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Cheers. Expecting a bit of a rocky road but we shall see... Dpmuk (talk) 03:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- And d'oh. That was the one one line I didn't check as I thought Eagles247 had sorted that line. Bad start, good finish maybe? Dpmuk (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- I hope it is not foreshadowing . I'll be voting probably tomorrow when I have time. -- Luke (Talk) 03:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- So do I, so do I. Oh well nothing I can do now! Dpmuk (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- I hope it is not foreshadowing . I'll be voting probably tomorrow when I have time. -- Luke (Talk) 03:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- And d'oh. That was the one one line I didn't check as I thought Eagles247 had sorted that line. Bad start, good finish maybe? Dpmuk (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Cheers. Expecting a bit of a rocky road but we shall see... Dpmuk (talk) 03:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
That was a nice surprise; thank you for the barnstar. :) Acalamari 10:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Teahouse updates
Hi Luke! A few updates for you about Wikipedia:Teahouse, since you're one of our awesome Teahouse hosts!:
- The host lounge is open! Please take time to review the materials in the space and start contributing to the how-to pages. Your input is valuable. Not only is it great practice to get our minds thinking like hosts, but, you can also provide easy to understand instructions and sound bites for fellow hosts!
- Join the conversation by participating on the host lounge talk pages[1][2]. We also have an IRC channel now for hosts to get to know one another, develop your skills, and eventually the channel will serve as an additional help space for new editors!
- To visit the IRC channel: #wikipedia-teahouse connect (Feel free to ask me for help if you're having trouble connecting!)
- Let new editors get to know you by creating your Teahouse profile. Contribute your profile on the host page at the Teahouse! This serves as a fun way for new editors to get to know the people behind the usernames. You can post a photograph of yourself or an avatar, add a quote about yourself or something you enjoy, and share projects and activities you participate on wiki (with wikilinks).
Very exciting things are taking place, and we'll be opening the Teahouse no later than Monday. Feel free to ping me on or off wiki, and I can't wait to work with you to welcome new editors with a warm cup of tea :) SarahStierch (talk) 03:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
The Teahouse is Open!
Hi Luke! Great news: The Teahouse is open for business! We're ready to start inviting new users, answering questions and inspiring one another. If you haven't already taken a look at the links provided in the most recent Teahouse update, posted on your talk page, please do! Don't forget to add yourself to the Host page if you haven't already. What's next? Inviting hosts and reporting your invitation information.
- Please familiarize yourself with this brief rundown of your responsibilities as a Teahouse host.
- Use the invitation guide to invite new users and report your invites.
- Make sure you have the Q&A page on your watch page and dive in when answers get asked! Feel free to ask your own questions - either seeking help or inspiring others to share their projects, ideas and inspiration for editing.
See you at the Teahouse! SarahStierch (talk) 18:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hey Luke! Just dropping by to let the hosts know about some new suggestions I've made based on interactions at the Teahouse thus far. Please take a look when you can! Thanks and see you at the Teahouse. Thanks for your work you've done so far, too! New suggestions regarding Q&A participation for hosts. SarahStierch (talk) 19:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. →Στc. 00:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- My mistake. -- Luke (Talk) 00:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I stubified this. Bearian (talk) 01:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Much appreciated. -- Luke (Talk) 01:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |