Please click here to leave me a new message and I will respond on your talk page.

Archives

edit

PMR!!!

edit

Andrew and I were going to make a PMR website on Moink maybe. Good job, keep up the good wiki work! Acumensch 03:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your Comment

edit

Thanks. I'm glad it made you laugh; I chuckled over that one myself when it occurred to me, and while it may not be the most encyclopedic-toned remark, it's sufficiently ephemeral that I figured I should go ahead.
Glad to have improved your morning!
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 15:35, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Skateboarding Wikiproject

edit

I was browsing through Wikipedia and was amazed that there wasn't a wikiproject on skateboarding. So I looked around related pages and found you. What happened to this: User:Liface/Skateboarding? It seems lik a good idea so why wasnt it 'officially' created? --Hdt83 Chat 08:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

Hey Liface, long time no chat.. just to let you know I've tagged the Jess Margera image you uploaded as replaceable fair use and removed it from the article.. this is part of a big cleanup, basically all non-free pictures (screenshot, promotional etc) that only serve to show what a person looks like are being rooted out.. if I tag any other of your images it's very likely for the same reason. DVD screenshots should only be used on the article about the DVD, rather than people featured in it.. Cheers, Deiz talk 14:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Harned.jpg

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Harned.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 10:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Philmargera.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Philmargera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Deronmiller.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Deronmiller.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Port Militarization Resistance

edit

Liface, I think we can say PMR is not disputed anymore. Let's poll it and remove the NPOV tag and call it good. Acumensch 17:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Flip tricks (skateboarding)

edit

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Flip tricks (skateboarding), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. VegitaU 01:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Flip tricks (skateboarding)

edit

Flip tricks (skateboarding), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Flip tricks (skateboarding) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flip tricks (skateboarding) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Flip tricks (skateboarding) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. VegitaU 02:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kerrygetz.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Kerrygetz.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Here's some WikiLove

edit

Possibly unfree Image:Splashmt.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Splashmt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Splashmt.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Splashmt.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell babelfish 00:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

NEWS OF IMPORT

edit

To Whom It May Concern,

     It has come to my attention that in dream and nightmare certain bleak realities reveal themselves. In sleeping hours I have seen visions of wormlike monstrosities with modulated, clay-like extremities working their way across the floor of my bedroom. It is bleakly true that I thought they were dream for but a while, however, it has become apparent that they are true, tangible forms of an alien menace. I awoke one morning to find one trapped under my bookshelf! 
I felt driven mad with rage and misunderstanding to see the writhing form underneath my overturned shelf, but it was clear that they were in my room the night prior. When it saw me, a formless pseudopod enveloped its head and it instantly incinerated, setting my room partially smoldered. There are others, they are examining us, and they let us see them in our sleep but leave no evidence! I found the one in a billion mistake they ever made. They are a hateful race from outer space, I've heard them speak, they send universal emotional signals that resonate with the metals in the environment, they hate everything, they examine and judge races then destroy them. They're so powerful! We can't detect them! They are trying to destroy our sun! Please, disseminate this information! It is vital the people tell their government what is occurring! Do not let the hateful alien worms take our planet over! 
 
With utmost haste, 
 
Jackson Trebalyadny  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.236.231 (talk) 03:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply 

Fair use rationale for Image:Ethniccleansing.JPG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ethniccleansing.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Windycityheat.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Windycityheat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Artosaari.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Artosaari.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bensonlogo.gif

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Bensonlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ckycrew.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Ckycrew.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

are a faggot

I have to ask

edit

Regarding that picture of the welt on your neck...how did you manage to do that with a credit card? Uranographer (talk) 11:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I guess if anything gets going fast enough it could leave a welt; I never would have guessed that came from a credit card though. It must have hurt! Uranographer (talk) 11:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Toy machine page

edit

it had Matt Bennett and Nick Trepasso as ams, which they are not. i fixed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.135.237 (talk) 18:22, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lester.gif)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Lester.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


Need help

edit

I need your help at the Tony Hawk Games Wiki, which can be found here. It is very lonely. Me and this other user are the only ones there (were both admins). I f you do join, and if you have questions,please see this user page. --98.148.176.87 (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!

edit

THIS IS URGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASSE READ!!! RODNEY MULLEN ARTICLE NEEDS UNVANDALISING! I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO!!!!! I CHECKED THE HISTORY PAGES TO TRY AND UNDO THE VANDALISM, BUT IC COULDN'T UNDERSTAND IT!!!!!!!!! PLEASE REVERT IT FOR ME! EVERTHINGS THE WRONG SIZE! THIS IS HORRIBLE!!!!



Sorry about the caps, but I don't know what to do, please help!

I am copying this to the talk pages of everyone else associated with the Mullen article, including it's discussion page!

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Liface! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Kerry Getz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

"There's a citation for this"

edit

You just removed a "citation needed" on Ziad Fazah claiming that there is already a citation. Where is it? - Iketsi (talk) 21:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Request for help

edit

I am an unregistered editor, and I attempted to edit http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=College_tuition_in_the_United_States&action=history where I see you have edited recently, but 'Nasnema' just now apparently vandalised the page, and reverted my edits, falsely claiming that I did not cite my sources; I did cite my sources.

I am a religious person who believes in God, and I do not wish to cause unnecessary pain or trouble for 'Nasnema,' but also, I must defend the truth and what is right: It would appear that this user is valdalising this page, & falsely claiming that I am --which makes a good case that I should not join Wikipedia. Could you please look itno it? Thank you.71.101.40.113 (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Los santos inocentes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estremadura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Thomas Broich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bundesliga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Liface. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Meetup Invitation

edit

You are invited to the upcoming Asian Pacific American Heritage month edit-athon.

This will be held on the first floor of the Knight library at the University of Oregon.

For more information please see: Wikipedia:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA, a Facebook event link is also available on the Meetup page.

  • Date: Friday, May 26, 2017
  • Time: 12:00 pm – 4:00 pm
  • Location: Edminston Classroom, Knight Library, Room 144
  • Address:1501 Kincaid Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1299

Hope to see you there!

(This message was sent to WikiProject members via Wikipedia:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA/MailingList on 23:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC). To opt-out of future messages please remove your name from the mailing list.)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Liface. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Liface. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Liface from fellow WikiProject Skateboarding member!

edit
  A sick Harold Hunter wallride for you!

I'm Wil540 and I am a member of WikiProject_Skateboarding like you and I also run an independent digital history project focused on skateboarding called the Skateboarding Digital History Project.

Unfortunately, the Rick McCrank article has been nominated for deletion. Please contribute if you feel opinionated on the nomination: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rick_McCrank_(2nd_nomination) --Wil540 art (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply