This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Liberty1892 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

why am i blocked what did i do wrong? I always co -contribute to wikipedia. I was shocked and suddenly blocked. What is the reason? the many who edit wikipedia with wrong info but you don't block it are false hoaxers who want to ruin the info of an article. I have done nothing like that. why did you block me?

Decline reason:

checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 05:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2021

edit
 

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 08:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's not Hoaxes. That is true. even if you check more. The info posted there is wrong, so I just corrected it. So choose you well. ikaw na! TV5 Batangas SFN DTT18 as well. but there. Then TV5 Tarlac DTT18 SFN too but you are removing it. I also corrected TV5's LCNs because that's what was updated but you returned it to the previous one. You seem to have memorized everything, but you don't. Another acticle posted there is also wrong but you don't remove it. Liberty1892 (talk) 11:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I reverted your edits as you did at List of analog television stations in the Philippines because you are a sock of Ljlas20. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 06:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Im not a sock of Ljlas20. im not connected to that user. SeanJ 2007 Liberty1892 (talk) 08:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Then tell that to the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ljlas20 because your account is under investigation. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Liberty1892. You can ignore the above comment. I've closed the investigation; no evidence was presented that you had done anything wrong. Sorry you've had such a rough introduction to things here. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 18:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hi Liberty1892! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 18:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

thanks! Liberty1892 (talk) 04:40, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multipoint Broadcasting Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Analog. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Nueva Ecija TV48.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Nueva Ecija TV48.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Nueva Ecija TV48.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Nueva Ecija TV48.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Back to Christ.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Back to Christ.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from DWFU-TV into DWFU-DTV. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jao TV for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jao TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jao TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of RNG Luzon

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RNG Luzon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 23:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit

Orphaned non-free image File:Nueva Ecija TV48.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Nueva Ecija TV48.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

DWTP-TV moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, DWTP-TV, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 15:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of DWFB-DTV for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWFB-DTV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWFB-DTV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 TT me 10:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:DWTP-TV

edit

  Hello, Liberty1892. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DWTP-TV, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:DWTP-TV

edit
 

Hello, Liberty1892. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DWTP-TV".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply