Feel free to leave me a message if you have any concerns.

You're being discussed at WP:AN

edit

I think you might want to go to WP:AN and explain why an indef-blocked editor such as yourself is editing with a block-evading sockpuppet. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 05:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit

I have filed a request for CheckUser for this account at [1] Ed Fitzgerald t / c 21:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Privacy

edit

Why did you endorse a CU made completely from fishing as the user made an accusation in "bad faith" to prevent his own editing being examined. LatinoAussie (talk) 19:27, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The endorsement was made on the behavioral evidence presented, so the case wasn't "complete fishing". As the check shows, you are a sock of Cazique. Icestorm815Talk 19:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
The case was fishing with the accusation made in "bad faith" to prevent his own editing being examined and you know this so don't try and make it sound any better. The check does not show that I am a sock of Cazique so do not lie! Unblock me as I have not been abusing multiple accounts! LatinoAussie (talk) 20:54, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
The check does show that you are a sock of Cazique. It proves that you both have edited under the same IP address. Icestorm815Talk 18:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
No it doesn't you are lying which is against policy! You have violated my privacy and are still continuing with lying! LatinoAussie (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
If you still feel that your privacy was violated, you're welcome to contact the wikimedia's Ombudsman commission, a group that handles checkuser complaints. Icestorm815Talk 21:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply