January 2020

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mithqal Fayez has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mithqal Fayez was changed by LINFAN01 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955862 on 2020-01-29T23:17:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"StopAd injection"

edit

Please explain what these lines of text, which you are adding to articles left and right with no acknowledgement or explanation, mean and do. Thanks. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Abdullah Al-Zoubi moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Abdullah Al-Zoubi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 20:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Akef Al-Fayez moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Akef Al-Fayez, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 18:08, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akef Al-Fayez has been accepted

edit
 
Akef Al-Fayez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fendi Al-Fayez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abila. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Daily Mail reference at Alanoud Al-Fayez

edit

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Alanoud Al-Fayez. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sattam Al-Fayez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages

edit

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without a reliable source as a reference are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Abdullah Al-Zoubi

edit

  Hello, LINFAN01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abdullah Al-Zoubi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Fayez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noble House.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Amer Al-Fayez moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Amer Al-Fayez, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 11:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Amer Al-Fayez

edit

  Hello, LINFAN01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amer Al-Fayez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit
 

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Amer Al-Fayez, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:LINFAN01, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LINFAN01|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 19:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Rosguill for your addition to my talk page. I have now added a statement on my profile that provides that I'm in no way being compensated by any party for my edits. I'm merely interested in the family that the person in this article is a part of for the time being as I write my book on internal Jordanian politics, which is highly-driven by families. This person is a high profile individual and famous in Jordan, and Wikipedia serves audiences from all kinds of backgrounds, so it's only appropriate that this page and the information on it is made publicly available through Wikipedia. I haven't addressed this issue before because I was unaware of the steps necessary to address it, as I'm not very able in navigating the website. Therefore, thank you for providing me with the information pertaining to clearing my name of being paid to edit. LINFAN01 (talk) 01:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
You've claimed File:Amer_Talal_Al-Fayez.jpg as your own work, how were you able to obtain the photo? signed, Rosguill talk 03:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tallest buildings in Amman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Millennium Hotel and Regency Hotel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Rashid Ali al-Gaylani

edit

Hello. Just to let you know I have reverted your move, and will be reverting all your changes of the spelling on other articles. As far as I can see, Rashid Ali al-Gaylani is the common English spelling, while the spelling you used does not even register on Google Ngrams. Cheers, Number 57 11:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Number 57, al-Gaylani is how Rashid Ali's name has been incorrectly adapted by Western sources in the 40s when he was most politically active. The name in Arabic الجيلاني commonly translates to Al-Gilani or Al-Jilani, with the word Gilani derived from the city of Gilan in Iran where Rashid Ali's ancestor came from. His ancestor, Abdul Qader Gilani, has a Wikipedia page with my same spelling. It's non-sensical to continue using an incorrect and unpopular spelling of the name when so many known alternative examples exist on WIkipedia. Also, when discussing Arabic names, explaining that "Rashid Ali al-Gaylani is the common English spelling" isn't appropriate since the name is made of multiple parts, the first name which is correct, Rashid Ali, and the last name which is incorrect in it's current form. When Arabic is translated to English, the translation relies on a highly phonetic spelling derived from English and not the other way around, I've been an Arabic speak for over 20 years now, and I promise you that the pronunciation of Gaylani and جيلاني are completely different, which only further proves that this spelling is an unnecessary mistake to keep holding on to. So, unless the spelling for the city of Gilan, the Sufi preacher Abdul Qader Gilani are both incorrect, or modern translations from Arabic to English completely changed their rules for the worse, the spelling Gaylani is incorrect. LINFAN01 (talk) 05:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
The relevant policy here is WP:COMMONNAME, and the current title appears to be the common name ( and not "unpopular"). Historic names after often spelt differently to modern phonetic conventions (for example Chaim Weizmann (modern usage is "Haim" and his grandson's surname became Weizman). Number 57 10:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Actually, the current title is the least common name because no one has ever referred to Al-Gilani as al-Gaylani. The Weizmann example is irrelevant because this isn't a case of a spelling that has changed over time, but rather an incorrect spelling further propagated by the title used on Wikipedia. Sources before the 40s had a variation of Al-Gilani which is phonetically accurate, and still used wildly today. If you want to examine commonality, find me another person that goes by al-Gaylani. Again, you have to separate the last name from the full name, because it's a two part name where there still exists some leeway for different spellings, but al-Gaylani is so far away from those that it is non-sensical to keep it's adoption. Al-Gilani, Al-Gillani, Al-Jilani, Al-Jillani, and variations without the hyphen and without a space between the Al which means "the" and Gilani. LINFAN01 (talk) 20:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure why you would make such a bizarre claim (that "no one has ever referred to Al-Gilani as al-Gaylani"). I provided the evidence in my first comment on your talk page, i.e. Google Ngrams (which shows the spelling was in use going all the way back to 1937). This is also the spelling Encyclopedia Britannica use. Of the other spellings you propose, none of them register on NGrams except "al-Gilani", but this is less common than the current title. I am quite concerned by you ignoring such basic evidence. Cheers, Number 57 22:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Again you make the mistake of conflating the page's title with the Al-Gilani name. But since you're unceasingly ignorant of all the evidence that al-Gaylani is simply an incorrect spelling, I will no longer pursue the matter. Let the page have this mistake forever. LINFAN01 (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's not a mistake or ignorance. This is how his name is commonly spelled. Number 57 11:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mamdouh bin Abdulaziz Al Saud

edit

Hi there, I think you're aware of the fact that unsourced edits are reverted. Egeymi (talk) 17:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Will you continue to add unsourced content? These unsourced edits will be reverted. --Egeymi (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I only forgot to add them, that's all. LINFAN01 (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamad Pasha Al-Basil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abbas II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply