User talk:LFaraone/Archive/2007/May

Re:WP:IFU

I think your auto-format template is great. Good Job. Wish I was able to be more active in Wikipedia now but I've been very busy lately.--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 01:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Series and parallel circuits

Thanks for removing this. That wording is actually very misleading, because an ammeter placed in parallel with the resistors instead of in series would cause the current to almost completely bypass the resistors, thus short-circuiting the whole circuit. I responded to your other question here, by the way. —METS501 (talk) 22:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

{{War-stub}}

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 06:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Regarding deletion of the 24 Hour Knowledge Factory article

User ffm:

I am the creator of the 24-Hour Knowledge Factory page, one listed as 'obviously spam' by you. I implore you to please check the Social Science Research Network for this global work paradigm and read over some of the many papers that deal with this new framework. Many companies including IBM have adopted and are in the trial stages of testing the efficacy of this paradigm. A link to one of the most recent research grants given to [Dr. Amar Gupta], the creator of this paradigm, is here:

http://www.eller.arizona.edu/news/2007/01/09_IBM_honors_MIS_and_Entrepreneurship_professor_Amar_Gupta.aspx

Please do some research next time before marking something as spam. I would appreciate your help in retrieving all the information that was written on that page. If you have access to it, I would appreciate it if you would please place it back in its original form and then contact me with any edits that you think would make it more appropriate for Wikipedia. Thank you.--Yuu.david 20:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikiquote

From q:Special:Log/newusers:

• 19:20, 12 May 2007 Firefoxman (Talk | contribs | block) New user

It this you? In case it isn't, I have put a preventative block on it to prevent cross-wiki impersonation (we have been having problems with that lately). If this is you, just tell me, and I will unblock the user. Thanks, Cbrown1023 talk 15:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)