L.A.Nutti

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox The Sopranos season one

Template:Infobox The Sopranos season one has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox The Sopranos season two

Template:Infobox The Sopranos season two has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox The Sopranos season three

Template:Infobox The Sopranos season three has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox The Sopranos season four

Template:Infobox The Sopranos season four has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox The Sopranos season five

Template:Infobox The Sopranos season five has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer rights

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 16:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Dangerdoomeu.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dangerdoomeu.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dangerdoomeu.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dangerdoomeu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

The Blue Comet

Nice work on the article. I was wondering why the deaths section got removed? Geeky Randy (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Code updates

Now proposed at Template talk:Infobox television episode#Code Updates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Template:Infobox film

Any more regarding the "Based on" field? After my last comment more than a week ago I kinda felt like I left the ball in your court. Ultimately I support the field as long as we aren't too restrictive about how we use it or how we format it. Since there is at least agreement that it should be included, we could always just throw it in and quibble over the finer points of usage another time. Regards. PC78 (talk) 01:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Bump. No more on this? Having come so far it would be a shame to let this proposal fall by the wayside. Regards. PC78 (talk) 16:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Genre The Walking Dead

Let's keep genre out of it. Why? _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 11:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Walking Dead ratings

Each of the individual links to The Walking Dead ratings leads to the individual pages where that rating appears. When you combined the references to one, you left a link that led to the ratings for the pilot only. You should only marry the references when an individual page/article is being repeatedly used, not when a site/source is used more than once. KnownAlias contact 15:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

That is incorrect, the reference clearly has the ratings of the first five episodes in a nice table. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 16:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Did you actually check the reference, kind sir? My god.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 17:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

No, I'm afraid I didn't. Lot going on on this end today; I'll leave it to the less distracted with my sincerest apologies. KnownAlias contact 18:03, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Main page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on April 28, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 28, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, Raul654 (talk · contribs). If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 20:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

"Soprano Home Movies" is the thirteenth episode of the sixth season of the HBO television drama series The Sopranos and seventy-eighth episode overall. It served as the midseason premiere to the second part of the show's sixth season, the broadcast of which was split into two. It was written by supervising producers Diane Frolov and Andrew Schneider, series creator/executive producer David Chase and executive producer Matthew Weiner; it was directed by frequent series director Tim Van Patten. The episode first aired in the United States on April 8, 2007. "Soprano Home Movies", which is set eight months after the preceding episode, details a weekend that series protagonist Tony Soprano (James Gandolfini) and his wife Carmela (Edie Falco) spend with his sister Janice (Aida Turturro) and brother-in-law Bobby (Steve Schirripa) at a lakefront vacation home in upstate New York and the complications that arise during this weekend. The episode garnered a number of award nominations and was the episode submitted to Emmy Award voters to represent the season, leading to a nomination for Outstanding Drama Series, an award the show subsequently won. (more...)

Whitespace editing is discouraged

[1] [2] ??? - Jarry1250 ^{[Weasel? Discuss.]} 15:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In The Craft (album), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Gift of Gab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Alma Gutierrez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alma Gutierrez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma Gutierrez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Feedback ^☎ 18:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott Templeton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Templeton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Templeton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Feedback ^☎ 18:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Navboxes on author pages

Since you have over 50 edits at Fyodor Dostoyevsky, you might want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates regarding including navigation boxes for adaptations of and related subjects to an authors works on the author's bio page.

File:Sopranos613b.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sopranos613b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 01:34, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

"Soprano Home Movies" FAR

Wikipedia:Featured article review/Soprano Home Movies/archive1 - Notifying you as you were the FA nominator. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 01:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PE-bring the noise2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PE-bring the noise2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Sopranosposters2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sopranosposters2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sopranos512screen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sopranos512screen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monica Dawson

The article Monica Dawson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Sopranos621.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sopranos621.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. A person in Georgia (talk) 01:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Sopranos620.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sopranos620.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Sopranos602.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Supersci

The article Supersci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable in any way.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --62.166.252.25 (talk) 07:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Supersci for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Supersci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supersci until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GrabUp - Talk 18:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)