User talk:KimYubin/Archive 1

Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grayground.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grayground. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Grayground., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Suhaengpyeongga! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grayground. has been accepted

Grayground., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 13:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of BIG Naughty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BIG Naughty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIG Naughty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Htanaungg (talk) 09:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

4 Only

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to 4 Only, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Adding an album to categories about a certain genre without discussing or sourcing that genre in the body of the article constitutes adding an unsourced genre. Please don't do this. Ss112 03:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

First of all, what on Earth did you change the order of the parameters in the Gaon chart citation I added for? What did this achieve? I created the page, therefore we follow the established citation order I introduced per WP:CITEVAR. Don't do this again, I will instantly revert you for it.

Secondly, why do you think a retailer/streaming platform's broad categorisation of an artist or album's genre is reliable? We don't follow AllMusic's, the largest music database in the world, broad categorisation of genres, so I don't know why we'd include or go with what Genie says. Especially considering the review on IZM you added to the article goes out of its way to say the album, unlike Lee Hi's previous material, is not R&B.

Finally, sales almost always go in a separate section to charts. Don't combine the two, and don't move citations for these into the header. They go next to the region they apply to, like all other articles' charts and certifications sections that I suggest you go look at. Any further edits disregarding these widely followed conventions will be reverted, so please find something else of worth to contribute. Thank you. Ss112 16:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I also can see you can't seem to write things in your own words, and you pilfered directly from Bugs! and IZM almost word-for-word. Don't copy exactly what sources say; this is a WP:COPYVIO problem. The next time you copy a source word-for-word, this will be brought to the attention of an administrator. Phrase things in your own words. If you can't do this, you should not be adding anything. Ss112 17:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Please don't summarise or think you know what a critic means. Don't summarise what you have literally stated as "trap, funk, emo rap and dancehall with a strong touch of pop" and reduce it to just "hip hop". There's a lot more to those genres than just hip hop, so you should be consistent across the article. Your edits across two articles now show you are trying to say one thing in the infobox and in the categories but say another in the body of the article where you talk about the album's genres. Be consistent. Ss112 02:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Please slow down your editing. Every few minutes you're finding something new to add to these Gray and Lee Hi albums. Sentimental ballad is not a genre, per Wikipedia's own explanation. Ballads come in many different genres, and as you might be able to see, Category:Sentimental ballads is only for songs. Do not use it for albums. Notice also how ballads are mostly sorted by genre per Category:Ballads by genre? So if you still consider "ballad" a genre, what genre are Lee Hi's ballads? Rhetorical question, because it's not in a source and I don't want you to add original research to the article. Ss112 03:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

"119"

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 119 (song), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Plutonical (talk) 16:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Big Naughty Sigh cover art.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Big Naughty Sigh cover art.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 08:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

DeVita (singer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, DeVita (singer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

I've noticed that you are one of the participants on the Wikiprojects page for Korean popular culture. I've made a nomination for the South Korean popular culture music group BTS for featured article. Any interest in participating and maybe making some comments? ErnestKrause (talk) 20:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DeVita (singer) (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DeVita (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DeVita (singer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)