Keeper0523
Welcome!
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, Keeper0523! Thank you for your contributions. I am Doug Weller and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Doug Weller talk 15:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
America's Stonehenge
editHi - I see someone has removed your photo. I'm afraid I agree with them. Besides the fact that you can't see the 10, even if you could, so what? It's evidence that someone carved the number 10 into the stone but not when (at the earliest the 19th century). And as an encyclopedia we try to keep a formal tone, which means in port no personal comments. Thanks though - don't worry about being reverted, after over 150,000 edits people still undo my edits! Doug Weller talk 15:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- I have several pictures of stonehenge that have hidden symbols shapes andnumbers that I have collected and worked on for years with a few professors. I can actually use these symbols and number to locate a triangle associated to stonhenge, in Dracut Massachusetts. It's a triangle in the middle of a marsh on State Reservation. I can also relate these numbers shapes patterns symbols ect. to many other places of interest. I tested wiki with just 1 single picture and the results were disappointing. I and my professors have figured something out that is quite amazing. I wanted to use your site to leak out this information slowly but it appears I will not be able to do that. Your website is sad at best. Steve
- I've got your email. I didn't delete your image, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a publisher of original thought - see WP:NOT. You may think our encyclopedia is sad, but the stats show a lot of people disagree. But yes, it's disappointing for people who want to promote new or fringe ideas. Doug Weller talk 17:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- I also concur with Doug Weller here. Please understand that Wikipedia summarizes existing sources; it does not push new ideas. It's not the venue for your pictures, unfortunately. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 17:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)