Ke31
Ke31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG other then deleting sohr as a source
Decline reason:
Until you accept that you did something wrong, which I agree that you did, you will not be unblocked. I am declining this request. Further unblock requests that are unproductive will likely result in your ability to edit this page being removed for the duration of your block. 331dot (talk) 10:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ke31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did edit the source and number of the casualities of the turkish army in the operation olive branch people said i cant do that since they trust sohr as a source i personally asked sohr if they can provide any proof for their claims that more then 80 turkish soliders got kileld sohr couldnt i did edit again and showed every one the email and even the phone number of sohr so if they dont believe me they can ask for them self they blocked me for fighting for the truth they are to lazy to write an email to sohr but not lazy enough to block me i did got blocked for editing to much and on wrong pages but i do not accpet a permament ban on something just because i critize a source
Decline reason:
There are places to evaluate the reliability of a source. The article isn't one of them. SOHR is well-known to not reveal its methodology or its sources. That's not the same as being unreliable. All of this shows some severe misunderstandings of how Wikipedia content should be edited and sourced. It seems likely that the issues that led to the block would recur if you were unblocked. Huon (talk) 01:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ke31 reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: ). Thank you. Dr. K. 00:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC) {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN talk to me 23:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)More edit warring in this area will mean a topic ban. --NeilN talk to me 23:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Note
edit
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.May 2018
edit {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN talk to me 22:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Topic ban
edit
As you have repeatedly editred disruptively in this area you are now subject to the following sanction.
You are indefinitely topic banned from making any edits about the Syrian Civil War and/or Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. This includes all talk pages.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the community authorised general sanctions for the Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. This sanction has been recorded in the log. Please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction on the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page) and you may ask for clarification of the scope of this ban. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.
--NeilN talk to me 23:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Ke31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
SOHR ISNT A SOURCE I HAVE PROVIDED enough for you just ask them if they can provide proof fo their claims
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ke31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i have deleted the sohr as a source apparently this is a crime because i dont had a source to back it up well i have read the wiki guidline and now know how to edit i request to be unblocked and wont delete things without sources to back me up anymore i promise that Ke31 (talk) 12:52, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline; this block has expired. Please carefully note your topic ban, which is still in place indefinitely. Kuru (talk) 00:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your block expires today but your topic ban still exists. Editing in this area (including talk page posts about the area) will mean a re-block. --NeilN talk to me 13:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Word of advice
editHey there, I'm not really a regular user around here, in fact this is the first time this account has been logged into in years. Normally I just browse the site and fix any issues I happen to come across as an IP editor, which is what I was just doing a moment ago on the "List of main battle tanks by generation" when I noticed you edit warring with another user over the Altay battle tank. I'm not sure why, but that compelled me to log in and send you this quick message.
If you have an issue with an article that you feel should be corrected and another user disagrees with you on this, this is a matter that you should discuss on that particular article's talk page, which in the case of the list of MBTs would be located here. Going back and making the same edit over again and arguing with that other user in your edit summaries is exactly what you should not do; that is against the rules on literally every wiki-type site I've ever contributed to, and I feel I would be safe in assuming that Wikipedia would have a much lower tolerance for it than most sites.
As for the matter of the Altay and the South Koreans, I believe the issue stems from the fact that Hyundai, a Korean company, has provided significant technical advice and oversight to the Turks on the design, construction, and ongoing development of the tank. Just a note to bear in mind.
A.O.A., Office of Naval Intelligence Section III, Delta-3 Division 20:11, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
I DID SHOW A SOURCE THAT ALTAY ISNT SOUTH KOREAN !!!!
August 2018
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of main battle tanks by generation and List of equipment of the Turkish Land Forces, you may be blocked from editing. There are plenty of sources in Altay (tank) that says it's based on the South Korean K2-tank, and that large parts of the tank are built under license in Turkey. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 14:30, 6 August 2018 i have left a source that altay isnt south korean unlike you so you should be banned for disruptive editing (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 23:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)