User talk:Kbseah/Archive 1

Archive 1

Speedy deletion of Viktor brotherus

A tag has been placed on Viktor brotherus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gromlakh (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter ax (November 28)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter ax.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 03:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Kbseah, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Peter Ax, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 16:44, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Faig Mammadov (agronomist)

added a link pointing to Azerbaijani

Heliozoa

added a link pointing to Marine

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gilbert Morgan Smith

added links pointing to Beloit and Stoughton

Edoardo Zavattari

added a link pointing to University of Rome

José Manuel Pasquel

added a link pointing to Concepción

Nicolae Costescu

added a link pointing to Romanian

Oonjal

added a link pointing to Plank

Parque Zoológico Caricuao

added a link pointing to Watershed

Pedro de Palencia

added a link pointing to Dominican

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Kudo system

A couple of years ago, you left a comment on the talk page of Kudo system, pointing out that it's just a list. I've nominated the article for deletion, and thought you might want to weigh in. As it happens, there's nothing particularly notable about Kudo's taxonomy, and it has never been discussed in the professional literature as "the Kudo system." (Kudo himself was a notable researcher, though, and probably deserves a biography). The proper place for the "article's" contents is WikiSpecies. Deuterostome (talk) 16:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kbseah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Zoothamnium niveum) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Zoothamnium niveum, Kbseah!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great translation. Maybe a candidate for WP:DYK?

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 23:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

'Siege of Malakand' revision undone (yes, I think it was a mistake to do so)

Hello

I am so new to this that I am not even sure this message will get to you.

I appreciate your input and your concern. If memory serves, I added the word "perceived" near the end of the following sentence, before the word "spread".

...border between Afghanistan and British India drawn up at the end of the Anglo-Afghan wars to help hold the Russian Empire's spread of influence towards the Indian subcontinent.

There is un-neutrality in the original sentence, I believe my edit made it less so.

It is a historical fact that the Russian Empire never had any interest in or towards India. British politicians of the 19th century would often talk as if Russia had an interest, but the overwhelming historical consensus nowadays is that they were mistaken to think so (if indeed they thought so -- quite possibly they were merely justifying Britain's expansion of interest in South Asia).

thanks A-W

205.210.47.14 (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

@205.210.47.14: Thanks for your message, A-W. Looking over the edit history, I believe this is that you are referring to? The edit I reverted was the word "feared" in "...a feared Russian spread of influence". On re-reading it, with your explanation above, I think that I misunderstood the intent of the edit. I was reading into "feared" the sense of "fearsome", which would have been introducing a personal opinion, whereas what you meant was that the Russian empire's spread of influence had not yet happened but was perceived to be a threat by the British. I'll change it back to something like "...help hold back what the British feared to be a Russian spread of influence...." In your original edit the "British" was implicit and I must have missed that. Thanks again for clarifying, and sorry for the inconvenience. Best -- Kbseah (talk) 17:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Modified from unknown List of TCL Chinese Theatre handprint ceremonies destination Please return the edit again

Modified from unknown List of TCL Chinese Theatre handprint ceremonies destination Please return the edit again Mhmd elbhery (talk) 21:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

• @Mhmd elbhery: I'm sorry but I'm not sure which edit you are referring to. My latest two edits were to remove the remnants of a large number of vandal edits which had been reverted by another editor, Maile66. I'm assuming that it was too difficult for him/her to disentangle the individual edits, so he/she may have reverted some legitimate, good-faith edits along the way. However, your user name is not associated with any edits in that article, unless you were previously editing anonymously. Could you please point me to the specific edit you want to have restored? Kbseah (talk) 15:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

@Kbseah Yes Tamer HosnY changed his place was under stan lee and placed in the list Unofficial and the amendment was made by ibrahim id This is not true in the right of a great artist like Tamer Hosny

• @Mhmd elbhery: As user Ibrahim.ID made the edit, I think it is more appropriate that this question be directed to them instead. They appear to have already replied to a similar question from another user on their talk page. @Ibrahim.ID:: Is there any source for "official" vs. "unofficial"? It wasn't clear to me from your edits. Thanks, Kbseah (talk) 20:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

of course, this is the page on official website for official ceremonies, any celebrity make official handprint the Chinese Theatre place it in forecourt (this is the map), the theatre official social page talked about Premiere for Tamer Hosny movie not a handprint, all newspapers from Egypt are clearly inaccurate. --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 21:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

• @Ibrahim.ID: Thank you for clarifying. However, there is the possibility that the TCL Chinese Theatre website simply has not updated their page yet, and the map of the forecourt also dates from 2016 and doesn't have enough resolution to see the names on the list. I do not read Arabic so I cannot evaluate the Egyptian newspaper articles as sources. -- Kbseah (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

at least, the TCL Chinese Theatre official social pages mention for that important event and they never talk about that (Just a Premiere), Tamer Hosny didn't make any works in Hollywood nor in USA, so this is illogically to be honored for nothing --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 22:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

@Ibrahim.ID Your speech is not true The site has already talked about this and in Facebook also and the World Music Report talked about it and international newspapers and this page is the Chinese theater on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/TCLChineseTheatres/posts/1396970757023179

Check out this video as well Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMgQht_s9Pw&t=1s

It is not a condition that the artist has a connection to Hollywood. There are many people who have won it and have no connection to Hollywood — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhmd elbhery (talk • contribs) 23:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

@Kbseah This is not fair .. How to be unofficial that Tamer Hosni is a big star is not so silly to do something like this .. The Chinese theater is the one who chose Tamer to receive the honor of his mark and was preparing a special ceremony for him and was attended by the President of the Chinese Theater and said there are 4000 stars in honor of Hollywood Boulevard, but the front yard dedicated to the fingerprint only nine to 250 or 260 artists and the plot will be among them alongside Michael Jackson, Marilyn and Brad Pitt etc .. Please return Tamer Hosni to the official list or delete it from the list unofficial Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhmd elbhery (talk • contribs) 23:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

* @Mhmd elbhery: and @Ibrahim.ID: I think this is simply a situation where there are not enough verifiable sources online to say for certain whether it is "official" or "unofficial". Until the TCL Chinese Theater updates their webpage with an "official list", drawing conclusions based on a possibly incomplete photo gallery, whether he is a big star, or whether he has any connection to Hollywood are in my view original research. Unfortunately the article is structured in such a way that there are two separate lists for "official" and "unofficial", without any category for "unknown". In the absence of any clear source one way or another, I do not feel comfortable taking a side on this matter and will let the current version of the page stand. Kbseah (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism on Yonggary pages

The pages for Yongary: Monster from the Deep and Yonggary (1999 film) keep being vandalized by that anonymous IP you sent a message to. He was already blocked for 3 days for unconstructive editing on those pages and after his block was lifted, he went back to vandalizing those articles again for which he was blocked the first time. Isn't there something that can be done to protect those articles? Armegon (talk) 23:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

@Armegon: Seems like you've already done what I would have done in the circumstances - request for page protection, and report the user for vandalism. Most vandals will give up when it's no longer fun or when they're bored. The pages are on my watchlist so I'll also keep an eye on them. Best, Kbseah (talk) 11:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Other comments (without section header)

No need to get angry over a wiki page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ady n8 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Hey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goatedits445 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Red of Black?

Some small confusion there, it's just that I thought we type in the name as, in the Red or Black? case, Chris' instead of the recently reverted version Chris's. I was thinking that was the wrong way of presenting it. 86.161.7.211 (talk) 22:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and thanks for dropping by. For most singular nouns including those ending in "s" the possessive is formed by adding "'s", with exceptions being names like "Moses'" and "Jesus'" where there isn't an additional "-es" sound when you say the possessive form out loud. However pronunciation can vary regionally, and from person to person, e.g. some people would say "Jesuses disciples" and others "Jesus disciples" for the possessive form. The Manual of Style suggests either adding "'s" to everything, or using the pronunciation as a guide, but in either case to be consistent within an article. This StackExchange post has a longer explanation of the issue. Adding "'s" to everything is simpler so that's what I'm biased towards, and also because I would pronounce it has "Chrisses". In any case I think that's the only incidence of a singular name ending in "s" in the possessive form in that article. Long story short: Both are potentially correct, but singular names ending in "s" can also have "'s" as an ending in the possessive. Hope this helps to explain my admittedly cryptic edit summary... Best regards, Kbseah (talk) 22:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Zoothamnium niveum

On 3 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zoothamnium niveum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ciliate Zoothamnium niveum is so densely covered by symbiotic microbes that it appears white to the naked eye? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zoothamnium niveum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Zoothamnium niveum), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih^Talk 00:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Unauthorized user

The page Coast Rider Was created using an unauthorized account such as the former Hangtime page. So therefore it cannot stand and needs to be deleted. 2605:E000:3D5D:5100:DDB5:F7E1:F5A:AC2E (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2017 (UTC)2605:e000:3d5d:5100:ddb5:f7e1:f5a:ac2e

I have replied on the article's talk page. Please bring discussion there. Kbseah (talk) 21:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Chappuis absorption) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Chappuis absorption, Kbseah!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Different enough from Absorption band to be included. Well done!

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Category: Environmentalism and Category: Environmentalists

I have studied politics for Animals and Environmentalism all over the world We must not be bias and must tell the truth even if you don't like someone. Environmentalism, Environmentalist and Animal Rights can be Rightwing not just leftwing or socialism.

JRR Tolkien Conservative author of Lord of the Rings Charles Lindbergh America First, meet with Hitler and Environmentalism American Freedom Party environmentalism EcoFacism Green Conservative Sir Oswald Mosley Adolf Hitler animal rights and anti tobacco movement Walter Darre blood and soil Herman Goering anti wolf hunting Heinrich Himmler Jorian Jenks Rolf Gardiner Henry Williamson BNP animal rights National Fromt England environmentalism Front National France animal rights Vlaams Belang Rise Up Australia Family First Australia Conservative Party of New Zealand National Party of New Zealand NZ First Golden Dawn William Pierce Environmentalism David Duke Republican Party of American Arnold Schwartnegger Republican Party of American Tesla motors endorsements for Donald Trump of Republican Party

Environmentalism and Animal Rights comes in all forms. We must not be bias even if we don't like someone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Environmentalfingers (talk • contribs) 01:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Charles Lindbergh and American Freedom Party Environmentalism

Environmentalism can be Rightwing in history too

http://www.charleslindbergh.com/conservation/

http://american3rdposition.com/?page_id=95 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Environmentalfingers (talk • contribs) 00:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I reverted the edit to Ecofascism because the cited sources were not directly addressing the topic of ecofascism, and so would appear to be improper editorial synthesis. Could you please provide more suitable citations? They should document how, and by whom, these subjects have been accused of being "ecofascists". That said, much of the article as it stands is problematic, and several of the issues have already been flagged. Please also remember to sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes, like so: ~~~~. Kbseah (talk) 00:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2013/10/lindbergh_nazism_and_environmental_fascism.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Environmentalfingers (talk • contribs) 01:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Lindbergh, Nazism and Environmentalism

Proof of Fascism and Environmentism = Ecofascism

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2013/10/lindbergh_nazism_and_environmental_fascism.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Environmentalfingers (talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Yes this article would appear to be more suitable as a citation for the edit you wanted to make to Ecofascism regarding Charles Lindbergh, rather than the one that you had originally used, which only tangentially dealt with the issue. To be clear, I am not saying that environmentalists cannot be right-wing. My concern is only that the citations are appropriate, regardless of what the article is about. Also, please don't post the same or similar content repeatedly on my talk page under different headings. Once is sufficient to get my attention. Please also remember to sign your posts (though I know that the bot usually manages to catch most cases and auto-signs. Cheers, Kbseah (talk) 21:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Snek

Barry is a snake. That is all the citation you need to know of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielnicee (talk • contribs) 20:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

The Shahada

Following a "suggested guideline" is not the same as presenting truth. Using the word "god" in place of "Allah" is not true to etymological origin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RC Silk (talk • contribs) 21:26, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Kbseah I would like to talk with you DouglasPebs (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello @DouglasPebs:. I assume this is about my reversion of your edit to Peebles. It was reverted because the content did not appear to be accurate, and did not cite a reliable source. Content on Wikipedia should be verifiable, adhere to a neutral point of view, and not constitute original research. Please see the WP:Core content policies. Kbseah (talk) 17:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dong Xiwen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Realism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Nador

That is the "flag vandal" who adds unrelated flags to articles. If you see something like that again, I recommend checking the editor's history. I reported the IP to AIV. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heinrich Anton de Bary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strasburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Wilbertomorphidae) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Wilbertomorphidae, Kbseah!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

May I make two suggestions: a) it would be good to give greater clarity that the family consists of one only genus which itself consists of one species. b) I don't think hyperlinking 'marine interstitial habitat' to meiobenthos is appropriate. One's a habitat; the other is a group of species. Maybe a further bit of clarity is also needed here, too? I'll create a new redirect for the genus Wilbertomorpha to this article.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 22:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

You made a mistake for reverting ox

The wiki article ox specifically says that a ox is a bovine mammal that is used as draft animal/beast of burden AND ONLY THAT.

In that kind of context its a yak, water buffalo or cattle, not a bovine like bison or African buffalo.

The ox article didn't mention that ox is any kind of bovine mammal and no matter the reason that should be in the disambiguation page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyrkin (talk • contribs) 23:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

• Hello @Gyrkin: Thanks for your explanation. I'll reply at Talk:Ox (disambiguation) to keep the discussion at one place. Please take the conversation there. Kbseah (talk) 20:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Edits to Loxodes

Hello Manudouz: I saw that you edited the ref names for the citations I added to the article Loxodes. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I just wanted to point out that the ref names were added automatically when I used the Visual Editor, in case you're wondering where they came from. However I do understand how they are maybe too cryptic for editors who are directly editing in wiki markup. Unfortunately I'm not aware of a way to edit the ref name within the visual editor. Cheers, Kbseah (talk) 21:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello Kbseah: thank you for the explanation about the automatic numbering of references reused. I think that the only way to edit the ref names is to switch between visual and source editors. All the best, Manudouz (talk) 22:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Warning

Are you entirely sure you meant to warn Doug and not the IP? Might want to double check that one. GMG^talk 19:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello @GreenMeansGo: Yup that was a mistake: I've reverted my revert and removed the warning template from Doug's talk page. I was using Twinkle and had multiple tabs open to look at the other contributions from the IP editor, so I think I just didn't see that the first edit was already reverted. Thanks for taking the time to drop me a message! Kbseah (talk) 19:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

I'm not going to lie, I was torn between leaving you a note and leaving a snarky "geez man, not again!" for DW. I guess I'm just feeling boring today. GMG^talk 19:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

@GreenMeansGo: Has this happened before to him recently? I sometimes patrol recent changes for vandalism, and had the feeling once or twice that edit conflicts were not being handled properly by Twinkle when two editors perform a near-simultaneous revert. But of course it's not to easy to attempt to reproduce the error... Kbseah (talk) 19:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Not necessarily him in particular, but a few thing are want to do stuff like that. The software for WP:AFC is terrible for it any time a page has been moved prior to review. GMG^talk 19:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey

Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Pinto Martins Fortaleza Airport - Inappropriate War Edits

https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Pinto_Martins_%E2%80%93_Fortaleza_International_Airport Please administrator, see CBG17 edits. He, She or It removes the official correct illustration photos there, keeping the page blank. It is fully not constructive. Regards. --188.108.226.4 (talk) 19:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello: I'm sorry but I'm not an administrator. I have noticed that there have been some editing disputes on that page, but I haven't had the time to look into it more closely. My suggestion is to use the article's talk page to try to engage the other user in a discussion, instead of simply reverting each other's edits. Try to make a good-faith effort at communication before bringing the matter to an administrator. Hope this helps... Kbseah (talk) 13:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kbseah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Ricky Martin

The article about Ricky Martin is true. Why do you ban content helpful to Wiki readers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.247.106.222 (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello. I'm assuming that you are referring to this edit: https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Ricky_Martin&diff=798076747&oldid=798068950. The content was removed because there was no source given. Content on Wikipedia, especially biographies of living persons, have to be backed up by reliable published sources. Please see WP:BLP for the guidelines on biographies. The article cited in the sentence immediately before did not mention the person either, nor is the name mentioned anywhere else in that Wikipedia entry. If he is not a notable public figure, please consider whether it is appropriate to mention him at all (see WP:NPF). If you do have a source, please be sure to cite it - it's okay if the reference is not completely correctly formatted the first time, as someone with more experience will usually fix it. See WP:CITE for more information on citing sources. Hope that this helps. Kbseah (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kbseah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Singapore Federation of Chinese Clan Associations (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Singapore Federation of Chinese Clan Associations and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 14:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Kbseah! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 14:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kbseah. Thank you for your work on Ibrahim Din. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 06:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the review! Kbseah (talk) 08:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)