Kbq430

Kbq430, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kbq430! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Andy Wells

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/st-john-s-mayor-to-take-charge-of-public-utilities-board-1.749696. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:45, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Newfoundland and Labrador municipal elections, 2017) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Newfoundland and Labrador municipal elections, 2017, Kbq430!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Heather Starlet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Heather Starlet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kristen Scott

The article Kristen Scott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to pass WP:PORNBIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Lana Rhodes

This article was deleted per a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lana Rhoades, then a redirect created to Penthouse Pets. Do not restore it unilaterally, your option to contest the deletion is to go to WP:DRV, deletion review. TheValeyard (talk) 16:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Gloria Allred, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fyddlestix (talk) 01:13, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jim Lester (Canadian politician)

The article Jim Lester (Canadian politician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 01:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kbq430. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kleio Valentien. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:08, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Melissa Moore (pornographic actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Melissa Moore (pornographic actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 05:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Ches Crosbie

For future reference, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates for the leadership of a political party — if he hasn't already passed some other notability criterion for some other reason independent of politics, then he has to win the leadership race before he gets an article because of the leadership race per se. So no, the fact that he's running for the leadership is not a reason why the redirect would get restored back to a full article — if he wins the race in April (which I'm betting that he probably will), then he'll get an article at that time, but we keep articles about holders of notable political positions, not unsuccessful or still-campaigning candidates for them. Bearcat (talk) 05:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador leadership election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Andrews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kellie Loder. I think you understand the underlying issue here. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Lindsay Shepherd listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lindsay Shepherd. Since you had some involvement with the Lindsay Shepherd redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Khangate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Khangate. Since you had some involvement with the Khangate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Doug Weller talk 20:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:55, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Davis (Canadian politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Brazil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, you may be blocked from editing. Ruyter talk 13:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

@Kbq430: Would you care to explain this edit? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:32, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Or perhaps this edit? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Primefac (talk) 13:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kbq430 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

account was compromised but I changed my password now

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, we are not able to confirm whether this is the original owner of the account. Please review what you can do as a compromised editor. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser note: This account does not appear to have been compromised. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Block evasion

This user engaged in long-term block evasion as MMMcMaster between May, 2018 and July, 2019. That account was finally blocked for vandalism and posting homophobic nonsense. --Yamla (talk) 01:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)