September 2020

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KarmaChris80 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How can I prove to someone that I am a different person? This reeks of mass-censorship. Did you even read my latest comments, asking how we can come to an amicable solution? Did you read the Wiki policies I pointed out? Did you check out the referenced source of the article in question and compare its obvious nonsense to actual video proof of what the General Quarters siren sounds like? Maybe you should spend less time assuming people are out to get you with made up stories that sound too nonsensical to be true and more time checking facts and sources. I'll be glad to tell you all about how I'm a different person than the other two. But seeing as you don't even need proof of "sockpuppetry" to block someone for it, I guess Wikipedia Admins are just a private den of choir boys, ready to have each other's back and cheer each other on, even when they've obviously screwed up. All observations aside, perhaps you can save face and work toward an actual amicable solution and we can let bygones be bygones. KarmaChris80 (talk) 4:01 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Clear case of sock or meatpuppetry. If you are only here to continue the edits at hooyah, then you are not going to be unblocked. only (talk) 23:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It actually doesn't matter if you are a different person or not; there is clear coordination going on here, see meatpuppetry. " A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining." 331dot (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply