Karl-H

Hello Karl-H! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for signing up. Here are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Best of luck. Have fun! --User:ElectricEye (talk) 10:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Welcome

Hi, and welcome! And a few tips. One is that it is good to use an edit summary when you contribute, so that others understand what you changed. Also, it is good to put a bit more care into formatting, rules of punctuation, space after period and comma, etc., so that the end result looks nice. Enjoy! Write to me if you have any questions. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Variational number theory

Hello. Questions have arisen on the verifiability of the article on variational number theory, which you wrote. Unfortunately, we have been unable to locate the book mentioned in the references. The ISBN seems to be invalid. Could you please check the details and add the year of publication? It would also be helpful if you could mention another reference. Thanks. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:12, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I have nominated variational number theory for deletion, for the reasons described on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Variational number theory. You may wish to comment on that page. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as variational number theory, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. . It's been deleted three times now. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Also, I'm afraid I used the [rollback] admin function to revert some of your edits of other articles; that was incorrect on my part, except for those parts adding references to variational number theory. The edit description should have been "revert incorrect or misleading references", or something along those lines. Feel free to add back in material I deleted in those articles, if you feel that I made a mistake. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Style tip

Just a note. The section name instead of

==Perron,s Formula==

should be

==Perron's formula==

So, instead of the comma there is apostrophe, per normal English rules, and there should be small "f" in formula per the style manual. Thanks. You can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Variational number theory

Hi Karl,

Can you provide references for articles that define or deal with variational number theory? linas 19:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Notability of Rainbow Ojamajo Doremi

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rainbow Ojamajo Doremi, by Dennisthe2 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rainbow Ojamajo Doremi is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rainbow Ojamajo Doremi, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

mathematical notation style

Hello. Some of your edits prompt these comments:

(1) You don't need to write

$<x>\,$

when you mean

$\langle x\rangle .\,$

Instead of writing

$\int \int \cdots \,dydx$

you can write

$\int \int \cdots \,dy\,dx.$

Notice the difference between

$exp(x)+ln(x)\,$

and

$\exp(x)+\ln(x).\,$

The latter is standard. Michael Hardy 11:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Mertens function

Hi, I noticed you added some <math> code to this page, but it gives a syntax error, and I'm not sure what the formula was supposed to say. Could you fix this? ~ Keiji (iNVERTED) (Talk) 09:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

De Bruijn-Newman constant

Hi ! could you please be more explicit about this ? (it has been translated from here to our french page, but I don't understand it either, and this french translator - whose work was of low quality anyway - stopped contributing). Thanks, Anne Bauval (talk) 19:24, 14 July 2010 (UTC), fr:Discussion utilisateur:Anne Bauval

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wu–Sprung potential, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamiltonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Vixra

Vixra papers are not in general reliable sources. By the way, I note that the same paper was added by you here and by 85.85.98.230 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) here. Deltahedron (talk) 21:17, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)