Welcome!

edit

Kap 7, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Kap 7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


The Teahouse Turns One!

edit

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


  Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:50, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Can you make a correction to the "legal troubles" section of Insane Clown Posse to state that a former employee is suing Psychopathic Records, alleging sexual harassment from some Psychopathic employees? The way the section is worded now makes it seem as if ICP were the perpetrators of sexual harassment, which isn't the case, and also, they are not the ones being sued, their company is, which is a different case. Also, could you rename the section or merge it into the biography, because there is currently two sections called "legal troubles" which makes things confusing?

The source (NY Times) supports what the article says ... in fact, whoever added that quoted the source word for word.
As for the two legal sections and other article structure issues I'd suggest making note of it on the article talk page to try to get the attention of someone who is willing to put some time into working on the article as I personally don't have much interest in ICP. Kap 7 (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Kap 7. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Samwalton9 (talk) 11:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Rollback

edit
 

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Kap 7. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by I, JethroBT drop me a line 17:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Welcome to WP:STiki!

edit

Hello, Kap 7, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ki Fitzgerald, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages EDM, Indie and Classical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done fixed Kap 7 (talk) 11:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Now I know how to make replies and comments. I discovered it, I suppose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MacPoli1 (talkcontribs) 14:17, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, it's pretty simple. You did forget to sign your comment (an automated bot did it for you). To sign a post simply type "~~~~" and its added for you. Also, to indent as I did in this reply for readability you just type a ":" before your text. Increasing the number of ":" (ie. "::" ":::" etc.) indents even further. Of course, you can also use the preview button to see how it will look before saving a page. I'm by no means an advanced editor here but if you ever have any questions feel free to shoot them my way. Kap 7 (talk) 14:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations

edit
 
The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
 

Congratulations, Kap 7! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 05:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please see talking pages

edit

Please see the talk page of an article Before you undo the edits. There appears to be consensus For the video on the defecation page. I suggest you participate in the discussion before removing a video. If you feel this is an error please report it to an administrator as I will have to do if you keep removing without participating in the discussion

Thank you98.117.33.218 (talk) 10:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

98.117.33.218 I've been very active on the talk page I'm not sure what your complaining about. Feel free to get an administrator I'd be interested in what they have to say. Kap 7 (talk) 14:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate the offer Mdann52 although I'm not experienced enough. Kap 7 (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Kap 7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Kap 7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Kap 7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply