Kamlesh4rmBhopal

Welcome!

Hello, Kamlesh4rmBhopal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! utcursch | talk 17:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you brother, I will look into all of it. Kamlesh4rmBhopal (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Battle of the Hydaspes. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dr. K. 18:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Is using the excuse of the user being a probable Sockpuppet whilst their pristine quality edits otherwise sticking to the most rigid of Wikipedia guidelines a feasible reason for reverting their edits? Because otherwise it appears to be just Vandalism. Do get me links for it. What is otherwise the flaw in the edits?

Also, Sir this is not the first time I believe you Dr.K and Khirurg have collaborated together to revert another guy as a sock for Aseem's edits. I have verified that the guy had nothing to so with Aseem personally, but anyways since aseem was banned anyways, I have not cared for it. Please respond to me. Kamlesh4rmBhopal (talk) 19:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)