Welcome!

edit

Hi KWriteReturn! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! PiGuy3 (talk) 05:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:MarekKowalkiewicz.jpeg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:MarekKowalkiewicz.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Kowalkiewicz.jpeg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Kowalkiewicz.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor) (December 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewcm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lewcm Talk to me! 16:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, KWriteReturn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lewcm Talk to me! 16:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor) (January 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 13:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor) has been accepted

edit
 
Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Encoded Talk to me! 09:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, KWriteReturn. Thank you for your work on Marek Kowalkiewicz. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cara Federici moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Cara Federici. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and the sources right now aren't really reliable enough I think. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cleo Cooper (talk) 05:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cara Federici (April 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 07:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

You need to add paid editing disclosures for all of your paid editing; this includes Draft:Nicole Sahin and Draft:Cara Federici. Please do so before making any other edits. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Kuru Thanks, Sam. I did my first article through the wizard, which asked that question and I disclosed it. Do I disclose these other two pages on my user page? Do I just add a note to it? Cheers, Kate KWriteReturn (talk) 12:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Disclosure on your user page utilizing the same format suffices. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Kuru Do you mind if I ask you another question? I notice that the Sahin article has been moved from the mainspace - can I edit/remove the content which I think is causing the problem and then resubmit it (after I have disclosed that this is paid work, of course)? I'm relatively new to this and trying to understand how it works. Cheers, Kate KWriteReturn (talk) 12:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I would strongly suggest using the WP:AFC process for all of your paid contributions. You've used a number of unacceptable sources, and significant clean-up of additional poor sources and of the promotional tone is needed. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Kuru Thank you, I really appreciate your help. KWriteReturn (talk) 13:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Kuru. I would like to be a good Wikipedian and I appreciate your advice. I have cleaned up Draft:Nicole Sahin - is it acceptable? Cheers, Kate KWriteReturn (talk) 23:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nicole Sahin for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicole Sahin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Sahin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creepTalk 07:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nicole Sahin have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Exessive business language and promotion of business entities in a WP:BLP article. scope_creepTalk 08:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

They are not undone yet, but will be if the article is kept. scope_creepTalk 08:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Cara Federici

edit

  Hello, KWriteReturn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cara Federici, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply