JohnWiki159

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! - SUN EYE 1 15:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

hostage taking vs human shields

Listen, the crime the LTTE did is very specific. They shot at civilians trying to leave the warzone, and kept them in the warzone at gunpoint. In international law, this fits the crime of hostage taking not human shields. The UN report makes thats very clear. It cannot be both, as both crimes are different in international law, it has to be one or the another, but not both. I am not being unreasonable here. Your point about the death toll is nothing like this! Oz346 (talk) 20:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Multiple Human Rights Organizations have described these actions as human shields. You can't simply neglect them. This should be mentioned somewhere in the article. JohnWiki159 (talk) 08:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Athimanian comment

It's also your personal opinion that Athimanian was referring to a desire to ethnic cleanse all Sinhalese from north and east (including civilians). Where is your proof for that? What makes you think he is referring to all Sinhalese, when even the LTTE's own official materials refers to the Sri Lankan Armed forces often as just 'Sinhalese'. It is an ambiguous statement, and you are forcing a biased POV to justify what you want to believe. Oz346 (talk) 14:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Me knowing the context and having come across the LTTE's pronouncements and propaganda materials in Tamil, I strongly believe that he is referring specifically to the Sri Lankan Armed forces when he uses the word 'Sinhalese'. The Sri Lanka Army were often just called as the 'Sinhalese' by the LTTE in their propaganda materials. One example out of many is here from this LTTE song:

கொடுங்கோலன் சிங்களவன் Kodungkolan Sinhalayo (wiki is not letting me link the youtube link, but you can find it on google.)

The lyrics refer to the army soldier as just 'Sinhalavan' (Sinhala man) and that his fort and lion flag will fall following an attack.

That UTHR quote you inserted didn't cite it within the context of ethnic cleansing, that's your own interpretation. You need to provide evidence that Sinhalese in that context is used in the sense of Sinhalese civilians and not army. Oz346 (talk) 14:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Its your personal opinion and your belief. He clearly says, "Our goal is to drive away Sinhalese from the North-East...". Not "Sinhalese soldiers" as your opinion. It is just crystal clear. Also look at this. "Our Leader is supreme and unfathomably wise, the Sinhalese and the rest of the world are fools". How are you trying to justify this now? Are you trying to say they are referring to Soldiers here too? JohnWiki159 (talk) 18:10, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

"Our goal is to drive away Sinhalese from the North-East...". Not "Sinhalese soldiers" as your opinion. It is just crystal clear."

More like clear as mud. I have just given you evidence of when 'Sinhalese' was used specifically to refer to just Sinhala soldiers. That quote about Sinhalese being 'fools' is obviously referring to all Sinhalese. That does not prove anything. It's a strawman argument, as it's a completely different quote in a different context. Yes the word 'Sinhalese' can be used to refer to Sinhalese people as whole, but it also can be used to refer to just Sinhalese soldiers. It depends on the context. We have evidence for both those occurences. Oz346 (talk) 00:46, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

What evidence have you provided? He is saying Sinhalese. Not "Sinhalese Soldiers". You are saying " That quote about Sinhalese being 'fools' is obviously referring to all Sinhalese". Yeah its obvious because they are obviously referring to the Sinhalese. Same as "Our goal is to drive away Sinhalese from the North-East...". They are referring to Sinhalese. Sinhalese is Sinhalese. There is a difference between the two terms Sinhalese and Sri lankan Soldiers. Also, talking from your point of view, Why are they referring "Sinhala army" as just Sinhalese then? Is it because it is hard to say "Sinhalese army" or "Sri lankan army"? You are trying to prove a non-existent point. JohnWiki159 (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

https: //youtu.be/ZO7ID-8QIVM

Here is the evidence I give of their use of the word 'Sinhalese' to refer specifically to just the Sinhalese army. The LTTE saw the Sinhalese army as representatives of the Sinhalese people, not as just 'Sri Lankan soldiers'. It's not a mystery why they used the two terms interchangeably. And it is much easier and quicker to say 'Sinhalese' than the longer winded 'Sri Lankan soldiers' or 'Sinhalese soldiers', especially when literally the only Sinhalese in the main warzones of the north were Sinhalese soldiers. Oz346 (talk) 23:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

https: //youtu.be/pbHYTnTGN4o

Here is another song where the word Sinhala is used to specifically refer to just the armed forces, in this case the Sinhala air force, the lyrics talk about 'sinhala dropping bombs (kundu)'. Oz346 (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello awaiting your reply. Thanks. Oz346 (talk) 20:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, youtube songs are not reliable sources to make claims. Songs are the feelings expressed by the song writers. Also, LTTE in their speeches specifically used the word "Sinhalese army" when addressing the Sri lankan army. For example, check Yogi's speech regarding the expulsion of Muslims.https://uthr.org/Reports/Report7/chapter6.htm#_Toc516626375. JohnWiki159 (talk) 06:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

That is absolute nonsense. You yourself have used YouTube as a reference on pages. These are official ltte songs written by the LTTE lyricists like Puthuvai Ratnadurai who was captured by the SLA at the end of the war in 2009 and made to disappear. This proves beyond doubt that the word Sinhalese was used by the LTTE at times just to refer to the armed forces. I am going to remove the quote you have placed as there is no proof that it refers to ethnic cleansing. You need to provide proof or seek a third opinion to substantiate your conjecture and baseless assumption that it refers to ethnic cleansing. Even the original uthr source makes no reference to ethnic cleansing Oz346 (talk) 09:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

According to Wikipedia policies, "Most videos on YouTube are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, and should not be used at all. Content uploaded from a verified official account, such as that of a news organization, may be treated as originating from the uploader and therefore inheriting their level of reliability". I have used Aljazeera youtube channel as references in one of my previous edits. Aljazeera is a verified official account. But in your case, your youtube sources are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable. Also, your youtube sources don't prove that "Sinhalese was used by the LTTE at times just to refer to the armed forces". These are youtube songs you have provided which are not reliable at all. Whereas I have given you evidence where they specifically use the phrase "Sinhalese army" when addressing the Sri lankan army. Also, in Athimanian's statement, he refers to the "Sinhalese". Not "Sinhalese army". He says "Our goal is to drive away Sinhalese from the North-East and establish Tamil Eelam". This explains the motive. It is not a secret that LTTE did ethnic cleansing of Sinhalese and Muslims from the North East. Also from your point of view, if LTTE's motive was only to drive away SL army from the North East, why did they engage in ethnic cleansing of Sinhalese and Muslim civilians from the North East?

I have requested a neutral third opinion from an independent observer. Lets listen to the third opinion and proceed. JohnWiki159 (talk) 12:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Check my comments on the LTTE talk page. Your mention of ltte ethnic cleansing elsewhere in history is a strawman argument. In my pov, ltte ethnic cleansed Muslims and Sinhalese in response to atrocities committed against Tamil civilians by members of those ethnic groups. But this is not a constant. As we know ltte later formally recognised the rights of both those communities to exist in north east during peace talks. So just because ltte did ethnic cleanse in the past, does not mean at all that that is what Athimanian was referring to when he used that statement. The two are not mutually exclusive.Oz346 (talk) 12:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Origins of civil war page

Hi still awaiting your reply. Thanks. Oz346 (talk) 10:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam

As a contributor to the page Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, it would be great if you can share your views on keeping FBI comments on the LTTE. Cossde (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring on Sexual violence against Tamils in Sri Lanka

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Oz346 (talk) 15:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom Notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Designating_Sri_Lanka_as_a_contentious_topic and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Cossde (talk) 01:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration case request resolved by motion

The Arbitration case request Designating Sri Lanka as a contentious topic has been resolved by motion. The enacted motion designates Sri Lanka, broadly construed, as a contentious topic. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 14:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)