JnpoJuwan

Welcome!

Hello, JnpoJuwan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 15:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ManyAreasExpert (talk) 23:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hi, you made a major edit to Moving the goalposts but didn't put an edit summary. Some of the changes seemed unproductive, like removing the {{wikt}} template and moving a section anchor (see Template:Anchor#Rationale for substitution in the header: this placement hides the section title), so I reverted the edit, which is unfortunate since some of the changes were good, like adding citation templates. I might go back and redo some of the changes myself.

In the future, please:

1. Break up large edits into multiple smaller edits so that they can be reviewed more easily. For example, you might do a section at a time or fix one type of problem at a time. See Wikipedia:Good editing practices § The normal editing process
2. Always write an edit summary, even for relatively minor edits, but summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Even a short one is better than none at all. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your editing preferences.
   By the way, you can use this tool to see how often you use edit summaries or not.

Thanks!

— W.andrea (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

@W.andrea sorry! I wasn't aware that Wiktionary templates were used in this way, as I have never seen them before in mid article. I have redid my edits keeping that and included an edit summary, I'll try to include those more in the future. it was a surprise to me that already two-thirds of my edits do have edit summaries, ahah! Juwan (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, though your redo was still roughly the same size, which again, makes it hard to review. For example, you removed the reference "Cheating Swedish Goalkeeper Moving Goalposts" without explanation. However, I'm not about to contest it since it could plausibly be a copyright infringing link. For reference see WP:REMOVAL. — W.andrea (talk) 01:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

cheers! thanks for your advice. you're a very nice editor. Juwan (talk) 11:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I try :) And thanks to you for being open-minded :) — W.andrea (talk) 18:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Talk page reply notification

Hi @JnpoJuwan, just wanted to reach out and let you know that I've replied to your recent post on Talk:MrBeast. When you can, if possible, do reply.

Thanks!

2601:19E:427E:5BB0:4DA2:6CAA:84D7:64BC (talk) 00:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Black-tufted marmoset

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Black-tufted marmoset, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Indic scripts

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Vinesh Phogat, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

@Fylindfotberserk sorry, only after adding did I see your message. cheers for alerting me, I will remove it if you haven't already. Juwan (talk) 14:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

drafts

Hey! It's no biggie at all, but in general I prefer folks not edit my userspace drafts unless we're specifically collabing on something; i have a particular workflow with them and I usually add things like cats and infoboxes at the very end. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

@Generalissima so sorry, I didn't know! I added them since this was mostly info missing in both the main and draft versions. thank you for telling me, I won't do it again. cheers and have a nice editing. Juwan (talk) 22:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Removal of interlanguage links

Please do not remove interlanguage links ({{ill}} or {{Interlanguage link}}). It's perfectly valid to have them in articles. I've restored it. BorgQueen (talk) 23:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

@BorgQueen is there any excuse for them to be removed as this is a red link on lead? there is another {{ill}} further down, which is why I thought it was okay. otherwise, I'm sorry, I have learnt better! Juwan (talk) 00:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Rômulo has been accepted

Miguel Rômulo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)