User talk:Jerrch/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Archives
|
![]() |
TfD nomination of Template:ROC2
Template:ROC2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — John Smith's 23:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Political edits
Since the conventions have been adopted and you've agreed not to edit war, I have no further objection. To be honest the voluntary moratorium wasn't working anyhow since one of the other involved parties refused to abide by it. -Loren 23:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- OK, Thanks.--Jerry 23:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Be happy!
Gdk411 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
You've kept your cool during all of the recent events. Keep it up! Gdk411 23:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:SBL logo.png
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:SBL logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
substing user warnings
When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.
This regards [1]. Good job reverting vandalism and sending out user warnings. MKoltnow 21:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks.--Jerry 21:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Banners
Of course. Do you want a separate banner, or a work group option under WPTAIWAN? Aquarius • talk 17:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:JhubeiCity.png
Thanks for uploading Image:JhubeiCity.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
don't edit war over the POV tag in Taiwanese aborigines
If someone puts the POV tag back up, please don't remove it again... Some people want to share their POV by claiming the article is currently POV. OK, we should let them produce sources. Give them plenty of time. If we edit war over the tag, changing it back and forth, the article will lose Featured Article status. Please don't let them make that happen. Don't keep changing the article; leave it alone now. Thanks. Ling.Nut 19:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't care whether it's Aborigines or aborigines; perhaps I slightly prefer the latter. But Maowang wants to follow the articles/books by Brown in this matter. The most important thing is to avoid going back and forth.. again, it will be perceived as an edit war and the article will lose its FA. Ling.Nut 19:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- The banner looks good... good work! Ling.Nut 20:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey! :D
haha...it looks like this time your the one calming me down :D... (REMEMBER THE TINGMING :P ...lol). Thank you! Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 01:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- haha...i saw it...:P Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 01:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism to my User Page and Talk Page
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Heqong 01:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Regarding this edit: I have reverted you and added a source to the article. Even if you strongly suspect User:Heqong is a sockpuppet of a banned user, I don't quite see how that justifies speedying non-controversial and easily expandable pages he created. Certainly he could have written all sorts of non-neutral and defamatory material, but he didn't. If the checkuser case comes back positive, take some action then. Also, the proper template to use in such cases is {{db-banned}}, not {{db-nn}}. Being a spouse of a former head of state is pretty much a prima facie assertion of notability, and it hardly takes much effort to find sources. Cheers, cab 03:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Naming conventions for Taiwan articles
Hi, Jerry. Could you please link me to the policy page that addresses the current consensus for naming conventions for Taiwan related articles? I'm currently investigating Heqong, and it seems like s/he is trying to make a point. Please leave your reply on my talk page. Thanks! -- Merope 04:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it's pretty much a moot point, since the CheckUser says that he's very likely a sock, anyway. Figures. -- Merope 15:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
蔣元帥? Very rare usage in Chinese. Google gives 128 results. Blueshirts 02:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- if you'll note I said "in Chinese". Nobody calls him Genearlissimo in Chinese. You didn't have to google the obvious english usage of the word. Blueshirts 17:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- yeah of course I know this is the english wikipedia. For example that's why I redirected Opeation nekka to great wall incident instead of the other way around. I was just thinking that it's better to write "President" CKS in the memorial hall article since that's how he was commemorated, as the "late president" (先總統), not "genearlissimo" or anything else. Blueshirts 17:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I was told i vandalised a page about long dong silver and kemsing kent and I didn't. Someone else might of hacked into my account or something but i havn't even heard of some of the things i vandalised
Alicaponi—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.241.17 (talk • contribs)
- Well I don't know about that, as far as I'm concerned, someone used your IP to vandalize.--Jerry 18:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
What should i do?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.241.17 (talk • contribs)
- Uh, I don't really know because I'm not an admin. Why don't you ask an admin like User:Luna Santin.--Jerry 18:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
The conventions cover only "naming" issues, which is part of the language.--Jerry 14:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) covers more than just "language". It also covers the political states of PRC and ROC. See Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Chinese)#Political_NPOV. Please use the talk page before making controversial changes. The neutrality of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) is disputed and should not be used in articles until the "disputed" and "POV" tags are removed. Please reply here. LionheartX
- I know they are disputed. They are naming conventions! Even the title of the page says "Naming conventions Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) " and not (China).--Jerry 15:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- If you aren't going to reply, I'm going to modify the table and remove the pov tag.--Jerry 15:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Since Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) is currently disputed, please refrain from citing them when making controversial changes. The term "(Chinese)" does not only mean the Chinese language, it is term to describe all articles relating to China. Also, please don't modify the table or remove the "POV" tags until there is consensus to do so. It is required get consensus on the talk page before making major changes to the naming conventions. LionheartX
- For the table, you're the only one who thinks that origin means state. And let me restate this one more time: Naming implies language. Although the Chinese language might be China-related, but Chinese language would be more specific, and therefore should be used.--Jerry 16:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Since you are the editor changing China-related to Chinese language, you are required get consensus for your edits before you make them. Note that I simply reverted to the consensus version. It is not for a few editors to decide whether your unilateral edits stays or not. You should get consensus for your edits at the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) talkpage before you make them. LionheartX
Alright, I just thought no one would disagree with that, but what about the table? You were the only one who disagree with my edit (And without a good reason).--Jerry 16:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Refer to the reply on the article talk page. LionheartX
What the hell was that on my talk page?!?
I'm sorry, but I don't read chinese, I can only speak Cantonese and that's it...so can I get a translation of whatever that anon. wrote? Thanks :D Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 15:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- K...I could find any thing, so I think its justified that we remove it. My thought is that the KMT has ruled the ROC for so long, the Three Principles of the People just became an unofficial motto for the ROC.... Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 15:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Tru that...but if you look at the polls Ma and the KMT are increasingly becoming more popular than the DPP and their candidate...well it all come down to the election...we'll see... Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 16:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Really, i don't care who wins, i just none of them are stupid enough to anger the communist who have the capability and the man power to do a lot of damage, especially the fact that the US isn't going to do anything cause the commies have got the americans in a very tight place, with them holding a few hundred billion dollars in tresury bonds...well the election can go either way so...thats all i have to say... :P :D Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 16:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Nope, I did not know that :P Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 16:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- I see, i should have picked up on that cause I have family in Hong Kong :P :D Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 16:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Nope, I did not know that :P Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 16:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Really, i don't care who wins, i just none of them are stupid enough to anger the communist who have the capability and the man power to do a lot of damage, especially the fact that the US isn't going to do anything cause the commies have got the americans in a very tight place, with them holding a few hundred billion dollars in tresury bonds...well the election can go either way so...thats all i have to say... :P :D Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 16:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Tru that...but if you look at the polls Ma and the KMT are increasingly becoming more popular than the DPP and their candidate...well it all come down to the election...we'll see... Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 16:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
The arbitration case has been decided. TingMing has been banned by the Arbitration Committee for one year if his current indefinite block is overturned.
For the Arbitration Committee,
- Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 19:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: TingMing
...I dunno why, but I kinda miss TingMing... Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 10:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- lol...ya that might happen, but my watchlist is so inactive without him, all the other POV pushers on other issues give up after an hour or two... Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 10:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
B ratings
Generally we've been following the rule that an article must have several references before it can be rated higher than "Start". --Ideogram 21:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, which article are you talking about?--Jerry 01:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
wp tai abor
- There probably are not enough editors to support a wikiproject; making it a work group within WP Taiwan may be better. Having said that, Aquarius was too bold to do it without consensus. Ling.Nut 16:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
National Pingtung University of Science and Technology
Please create National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, 國立屏東科技大學 pages. and include below information:
1. Introuction, history.
2. Location and area size.
3. Symbols of university.
4. departments and colleges have been set. noaccidently, every university including NPUST had attentant its students' English ability Thank you very much.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Roded86400 (talk • contribs) Visit www.npust.edu.tw for more informationRoded86400 04:06, 28 June 2007 (UTC)(Longlive)
Hello
G'day mate...(lol)...Just to let you put something on your radar: Let me introduce you to the IP 212.51.199.173. This guy has some sort of POV I can't quite pin point, although my guess is he/she has some sort of Pan-Blue/PRC mix POV. anyhoo...could you keep track of him/her if you have the time. Thanks. Nat Tang ta | co | em 03:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Yilan International Children's Folklore and Folkgame Festival is famous activity in Taiwan, but it likes lacking from wikipedia, please handle it, and I will more thanks you.
Non-free use disputed for Image:Videoland Hunters logo.gif
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Videoland Hunters logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
DC Meetup notice
Greetings. There is going to be a Washington DC Wikipedia meetup on next Saturday, July 21st at 5pm in DC. Since you are listed in Category:Wikipedians_in_Virginia, I thought I'd invite you to come. I'm sorry about the short notice for the meeting. Hopefully we'll do somewhat better in that regard next time. If you can't come but want to make sure that you are informed of future meetings be sure to list yourself under "but let me know about future events", and if you don't want to get any future direct notices \(like this one\), you can list yourself under "I'm not interested in attending any others either" on the DC meetup page.--Gmaxwell 22:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Re: the IP
Don't worry about it, he was being a pain in the ass...basically like TingMing but without the anti-green POV, just the anti-PRC POV. Well he stop, so its no longer a problem. Nat Tang ta | co | em 10:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)