Jeffreykenneth79

Speedy deletion nomination of Nfrastructure

Hello Jeffreykenneth79,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nfrastructure for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Daniel T. Pickett III

Hello. As a new editor, you may not be aware that Wikipedia articles cannot contain material that is taken from copyright sources. Most of this article was copied directly from http://ceocfointerviews.com/interviews/nfrastructure13.htm - which is not permitted. Normally I would delete such an article immediately, but I have held off to give you the change to remedy it and express everything in your own words without copyright violation. If you fail to do so, the article will be deleted.

While you're at it, if would be good to make it less promotional - this is an encyclopaedia article, not a profile in LinkedIn. Finally, it needs significantly more independent sources that discuss the subject in detail.--Gronk Oz (talk) 07:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nfrastructure logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nfrastructure logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nfrastructure

The article Nfrastructure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only coverage that exists is routine, with no independent analysis, and extremely narrow. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:NOTPROMO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nfrastructure logo 2016.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nfrastructure logo 2016.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 14 September 2018 (UTC)