Jasooon

Speedy deletion of List of 100 greatest hockey players by The Hockey News

A tag has been placed on List of 100 greatest hockey players by The Hockey News requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CastAStone/^/(talk) 05:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

It's going to be tough proving you have permission to post the list to Wikipedia, but if you were to be able to do so, absolutely the list could stay. The first 2 paragraphs after the table of contents of WP:COPYRIGHT (meaning Wikipedia Policy:Copyright) should help explain everything.--CastAStone/^/(talk) 06:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Look here for answers

Please have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey. You will find more hints as to how to help contibute, and why some things are not acceptable. You can also ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey. Thanks for being interesting in adding to Wikipedia. Flibirigit (talk) 06:11, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Sándor Petőfi

Hi, yes I am indeed knowledgeable in this area as I have personal connections to the region. Aside from that however, the main reason that I reverted you is that you removed sourced materal. This goes into conflict with Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If information can be backed up by a reliable source, then it can be included. If you believe the information is incorrect, provide reliable sources of your own. Khoikhoi 20:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Do most scholars agree with Kiss on this? What exactly is the current academic consensus according to most historians on Petőfi's ethnicity? Because I checked Google Books and many sources seem to agree with the article in that his father was Serbian, but we should try to follow what the current academic consensus is per WP:UNDUE. Do you know if I can obtain a copy of Petőfi adattár online? As for the use of Hungarian name for Slovak cities, the reason is that it would be anachronistic to not use the the official names at the time. As far as I know, Hungarian was the official language at the time, so the towns/cities were known by their Hungarian names. Today however the Slovak names are used. Khoikhoi 02:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Seal of Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering CTU in Prague.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Seal of Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering CTU in Prague.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Hobartimus (talk) 21:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Contact

Hi Jasooon, you should have no problem sending an email to me. Please see wp:email for insructions. However, I have limited access to the Internet now, so it may take some time before I can read and respond to your email. — Kpalion^(talk) 07:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

NHL statistical leaders

Are you suggesting we list Brett Hull as the all-time leading American point scorer? The problem with doing what you suggest is that for many players, this becomes original research, since coverage of this issue would be sparse. Thus, to remain consistent, we go by place of birth. I agree, in theory, that their self-identified nationality would be the ideal approach, but nationalism being the stupid monster that it is, there will be people "claiming" players as their own (e.g. Nabokov between Kazakhstan and Russia). By using something objective, like the political entity into which the player was born, we avoid this.

Anyway, the footnotes address the issue of which nation the player represents internationally. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 20:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

You can bring your concerns up at the article's talk page so it's not confined between just you and I. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 00:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem

During an investigation of copyright concerns with the article Czech Technical University in Prague, I discovered that content you placed on Wikipedia in April 2008 you seem to have copied content from [1] onto Wikipedia. We are only able to use previously published text if it is clearly public domain or licensed compatibly (see Wikipedia:Copyrights). This material is clearly marked "(c) 2001-2004 ČVUT FJFI". Please be advised that placing previously published content on Wikipedia without verifying that it is compatibly licensed is a violation of our copyrights policy. (If you are connected with a source and are able to verify permission to use it, please follow the procedures at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.) You may use brief direct quotations in accordance with non-free content, but otherwise you should contribute content in your own words. Wikipedia:Copyrights is one of Wikipedia's core policies. Contributors who persist in copying content on Wikipedia outside of the provisions of that policy after due warning may be blocked from further contributions. If you have any questions about these policies or to discuss the matter further, please feel free to come by my talk page. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

List of top international hockey tournaments in history

Hi Jasooon, do you want to delete the article List of top international hockey tournaments in history? Traxs7 17:46, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I want to delete it... since I changed the name of it... Now, it's called List of top international ice hockey tournaments in history. Jasooon (talk) 17:51, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

OK - I am going to re-add the request for speedy deletion so an admin should delete it soon. Happy editing. Traxs7 17:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

RE: IDE for writing Wikipedia articles

I have not tried it.. but I did find this. The link talks about using Open Office to create an article and then export it into a format that you can paste here. There are also some more tools here. Traxs7 18:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of top international ice hockey tournaments in history for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of top international ice hockey tournaments in history, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top international ice hockey tournaments in history until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Resolute 15:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Contact

I do have ways to contact. Use Special:EmailUser to email me, as I'd rather not put my email on here. Kaiser matias (talk) 14:10, 25 May 2012 (UTC)