Iwasaduck

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 00:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Iwasaduck (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did nothing, All I did was edit the page for the Blackbone 1, removing as much advertisment as i deamed my limit and re formatting some lines. I did nothing to vandalise anything

Accept reason:

Giving the user the benefit of the doubt, as the blocking admin. Let's see how it goes from here. Alexf^(talk) 20:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Admittedly I don't know that "vandalism" is really the issue here, but I do have some concerns about the edits you made prior to being blocked that I would hope you could address. Please walk me through what you were hoping to do at Backbone One, how you decided on your edit summaries, etc. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

I was looking at it and some of it wasn't flowing? I guess thats how i saw it. I added a few more sources, aka quoting xbox cloud gamings support for backbone 1.

I also added more formatting and added some more headlines Iwasaduck (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Deciding was pretty easy because all i had to do was see how it flowed. Admitally i did make a spelling mistake. But thats all Iwasaduck (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

I’ve asked the blocking admin to chime in here with additional detail and perspective. It is not clear to me the specific vandalism and context that resulted in this block. Zsinj^Talk 23:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

@Zsinj: Look at the user's Filter Log . The filter stopped him from deleting sections 10 times in a span of minutes. User should have stopped, and asked what the issue is, if unsure. Instead, deleting text and being stopped by filters continued. I would like the user to explain these actions before I can comment. -- Alexf^(talk) 00:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Oh sure, Yeah that, my internet wasn't working and at first I got a "network connection issue", and then i got the "cool down" message. I wasn't trying to delete whole sections, just the top bit because it looked messy and out of place. I completetly acknowdlge that this may off not be the correct move of spamming it on network issues, but its just out of habbit from other wikimedia hosted wikis. Iwasaduck (talk) 02:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Alexf, not sure if you saw this response. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

@Rosguill: No I had not seen it. Ok, will give the user the benefit of the doubt. Unblocked and watchlisted to follow up (wasn't before). -- Alexf^(talk) 20:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sony A6700 (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Karnataka was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sony A6700 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Karnataka (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Iwasaduck! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Karnataka (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

I was excited for that 6 months queue time! Haha I accidentally published it, THANKS Iwasaduck (talk) 21:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sony A6700 (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sony A6700 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 17:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello Iwasaduck. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Sony α6700, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Iwasaduck. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Iwasaduck|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Hiya! No sorry I didn't get payed for this, I was just interested in the camera and finally make my own wikipedia page, aha. It's the only subject I know well enough so thats why I did it. Iwasaduck (talk) 22:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)