Iwannacrib

A page you started (Wes McKinney) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Wes McKinney, Iwannacrib!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks great. What I've done is: removed all simple external links and made them citations, added a book citation using the isbn, and covered the links so instead of Pandas (software) you just see Pandas.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation. =

Thanks

Thank you for adding those data scientist articles. I really like them. Also very nice to link so many sources. Well, I am active in the German Wikipedia and could imagine to translate several of those articles later. Up to now I enlarged the R article and plan to run for a readable award soon. As package names or software is universal, you will understand a lot, anyway. If you have further suggestions, feel free to let me know. Btw. somebody who could be added as well, is Yihui Xie. --BrunosapiJens (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

New potential entries for your page

I would like to suggest the following, from "The Data Science Handbook". I have public info on most of them, so I'll be very grateful if you kindly point me in the right direction to contribute to the expansion of the page you created (my first wikipedia project). Thank you.

1. DJ Patil
2. Hilary Mason
3. Pete Skomoroch
4. Mike Dewar
5. Riley Newman
6. Clare Corthell
7. Drew Conway
8. Kevin Novak
9. Chris Moody
10. Eric Owens
11. Eithon Cadag
12. George Roumeliotis
13. Diane Wu
14. Jace Kohlmeier
15. Joe Blitzstein
16. John Foreman
17. Josh Wills
18. Bradley Voytek
19. Luis Sanchez
20. Michelangelo D'agostino
21. Michael Hochster
22. Kunal Punera
23. Sean Gourley
24. Jonathan Goldman
25. William Chen

Fitquant (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Sounds good. I am not very happy with wikipedia eitors though. They deleted Jonathan Goldman when I first created his page and are now deleting one of my pages. So I am going to be sure that I create pages that dont get deleted by DOS , LOL Iwannacrib (talk) 14:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Almost all your recent edits seem to have been to add links to xxxxxxx.com to a wide range of articles. Please see WP:LINKSPAM for more information on why these have all been removed. - Ahunt (talk) 13:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

150.242.72.108 (talk) 13:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)iwannacrib

Point conceded and deletes acknowledged

In retroscpect

1) links were to a non commercial data science site

2) all links were specifically interviews of data scientists et al

3) I am trying to improve credibility of data science here

however if you want to think it once more, I would be grateful

The links were all entered as refs, but were not supporting any article text, so they don't belong on that point alone. Furthermore most were entered in the lead paragraph, where we don't normally use refs, unless we have to support specific claims. It gives the appearance that they were gratuitously added just to drive traffic to the linked website. - Ahunt (talk) 13:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Iwannacrib (talk) 14:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC) ok today i learnt something new

Speedy deletion

You have insufficient experience to tag articles for speedy deletion. Please stop doing so.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC).

Did I make the wrong decision ? Please refer Iwannacrib (talk) 06:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Also if you can be clear and transparent for what defines the adequate threshold for such. Note I specialise only in spam concerning Indian software people or companies which I feel is a lot both due to economics and culture. Iwannacrib (talk) 06:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

You made at least two wrong decisions. You should know yourself without being told which articles you've recently tagged, whether it be for notability (A7) or for promotion (G11). What you "specialise" in is irrelevant to Wikipedia. You have very little understanding, if any, of Wikipedia policies or guidelines. Until you do, I suggest you focus on improving articles, not policing them. You should also learn how to WP:SIGN your posts, and you should not edit without logging in to your account.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Iwannacrib (talk) 04:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Iwannacrib. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Skomoroch

The article Peter Skomoroch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional bio. No evidence of notability as a scientist, businessman or generally; RS sourcing is punditry in an NYT blog. A WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of notability, and certainly not the coverage in depth that would be required of a WP:BLP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 12:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Drew Conway

The article Drew Conway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article. Grandiose claims, but concerning non-notable entities, and/or cited to non-RSes; no evidence of notability under WP:NBIO or WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE shows passing mentions in RSes, and quite a lot of people of the same name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 14:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeff Hammerbacher

The article Jeff Hammerbacher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability, was originally filled with puff and advert (which I removed), the subject of your article has not done anything interesting in over 10+ years besides his work with the COVID data project and even then he removed himself from the project after it took off

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nickgray (talk) 15:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeff Hammerbacher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff Hammerbacher, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Hammerbacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)