Iraqi man10

April 2015

Your recent editing history at Rojava shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Please read carefully

You need to explain what you are doing instead of just revert, revert, revert. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — MusikAnimal ^talk 01:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Rojava

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring, as you did at Rojava. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You continued to make three more reverts at Rojava after your previous edit warring block expired. It seems you are paying absolutely no attention to our policies. You've never posted anything at Talk:Rojava to explain what your concerns might be. Rojava is under a WP:1RR restriction per WP:GS/SCW. EdJohnston (talk) 00:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rojava without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Weegeerunner (talk) 03:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Why are you back to those old editing habits after being blocked for a month ? you should give an explanation to your edits. Your Edit on Syria and Aleppo has been reverted as it ruined the style of the article. Syria is under 1 revert sanctions. Revert again and you will be blocked.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 03:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:Attar-Aram syria, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Weegeerunner (talk) 03:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Complaint about your edits on my talk page

Please see the new complaint about your edits at User talk:EdJohnston#Uncooperative editor. If all the statements made in this complaint are true then admins should probably block you again for 1RR violation, perhaps indefinitely. You can respond if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

سڵاو، بەڕێزتان کوردن؟ Sarchia Banokay (talk) 18:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Module:Iraqi insurgency detailed map ‎. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)