Interestingstuffadder

Barnstar

I award this Barnstar to Interestingstuffadder (and/or eis puppeteer) for eir well-written, well-sourced, and under-covered additions to the 'pedia.

• I understand your reasons for doing this under a seperate name, but I for one consider such work, in the way you've been doing it, to increase my opinion of you(and you're puppeteer, whoever you are). Keep up the good work! JesseW, the juggling janitor 07:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC) /Archive 1

• I applaud your efforts.

--Ben Tibbetts 04:16, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

You're invited :)

Please accept this invite to join the new WikiProject Bodybuilding, a WikiProject dedicated to improving bodybuilding related articles. Simply click here to accept! Addbot (talk) 02:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your comments; I'm glad to know that even someone who has disagreed with me before can see that the way my gender got made an issue of was unfair. Once Erik/Brian went nuts last night, though, somehow I knew that the RfA wasn't going to succeed. FYI, I think the Senate Bus article as it is now is fine. Catamorphism 19:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Credit

You are right, well done! KnightLago 16:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Interestingstuffadder - I added the link a few days ago. It was just to let you know that the discussion was there. I figured you may want to add your input. --Elliskev 13:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

FAU

No, I promise I will find a way to work in the entire sentence with citations about the nickname. I don't know where yet, but I will find a spot for it. KnightLago 03:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology

Since you are interested in flags and emblems I would like to inform you that the WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology has just been created. Why not take a look? I hope you can join.Inge 20:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Check the Toupee page

See what you've birthed.... Its not as funny as it used to be, but its still informativeMatthewdkaufman 17:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

FAU

I can think of a large number of "famous" people who have visited the campus. Presidents, presidential candidates, senators, congressmen, governors, local politicians, authors, athletes, TV stars, TV news personalities, etc. They do not belong in the article because they are not notable for having visited FAU. They are notable for what they do. This is the same with Hogan. Marginally notable for family, TV show, etc., not notable for being at FAU. If I were to add "famous" people to the article every time they visited there would be so many that they would require their own section. The only reason to add her would be is if she did something notable at FAU. Just visiting is not enough. It would be questionable to add her even if she was actually accepted and enrolled, which at this point is unlikely. KnightLago (talk) 22:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

So we agree she is not notable for visiting. Now you're saying she should be added to the entire history of the university because she made a single remark about the school that was publicized? The editorial board of the Palm Beach Post does the same thing every week, we do not include their opinion, this situation is no different. I think you're really stretching this. KnightLago (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Comet (song)

I have nominated Comet (song), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comet (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Mark Chovain 21:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Joy to the World, Our Teacher's Dead

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Joy to the World, Our Teacher's Dead. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy to the World, Our Teacher's Dead. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:33, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of The Freshmen Up at Yale Get No Tail for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Freshmen Up at Yale Get No Tail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Freshmen Up at Yale Get No Tail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PGPirate 23:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ten Thousand Men of Harvard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ten Thousand Men of Harvard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Thousand Men of Harvard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PGPirate 23:26, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Shitpit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shitpit. Since you had some involvement with the Shitpit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Six Sided Pun Vows (talk | contribs | former account) 19:55, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Wellesley College Senate bus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wellesley College Senate bus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellesley College Senate bus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 14:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Bearded oyster listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bearded oyster. Since you had some involvement with the Bearded oyster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 189.106.232.100 (talk) 18:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Going to the bathroom listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Going to the bathroom. Since you had some involvement with the Going to the bathroom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 16:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Freshmen Up at Yale Get No Tail for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Freshmen Up at Yale Get No Tail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Freshmen Up at Yale Get No Tail (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cielquiparle (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)