User talk:Karl Dickman/Archive 03

(Redirected from User talk:Ingoolemo/Archive 03)
Latest comment: 19 years ago by Redwolf24 in topic WP:CCW
Subpages in Karl Dickman's namespace

Essays
Existing threads
 Older threads
Projects
Sandbox
Standard.css
 Link scheme
Standard.js
 Airbuttons.js
 Tablebutton.js
Talkpage archives
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Thread boilerplate
Thread help
Welcome

This page is an archive of the discussions taken place on my talk page between 2005 June and 2005 September. This Page is no longer live.


Note: I am implementing the use of synchronised threads on my talkpage, identical to those used by Alphax. To prevent interference with the threads, please post a comment rather than use any other method. To edit the synchronised threads, just use the [edit] link at the top of each section. See thread help for more information.
If you wish to thank me for something, I appreciate it greatly. However, I rarely take the time to respond, as I am usually engaged in other activities. My apologies, and you're welcome (in advance).


Archive

edit
Archive Start End
Archive 1 2004-05-23 2004-12-31
Archive 2 2005-01-01 2005-06-23
Archive 3 2005-06-23 2005-09-05
Archive 4 2005-09-05 2005-12-01
Archive 5 2005-12-01 2005-02-10
Archive 6 2006-02-10 2006-04-14
Archive 7 2006-04-14 2006-07-09
Archive 8 2006-07-09 2006-11-15
Archive 9 2006-11-15 2007-01-10
Archive 10 2007-01-10 2008-03-30
Archive 11 2008-03-30 2015-09-08
Current Current discussion

Sockpuppets

edit

If you read that reply carefully, you can see that it's perfectly feasible for them to be separate people on the same IP because the IP is not static. They could be friends, brothers, anything. In any case, the point is that it doesn't matter who is a sockpuppet of who. It only matters what their behaviour is, and that is what needs dealing with. Grace Note 23:58, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!

edit

Thank you very much for your supportive vote on my RfA. I appreciate you taking the time to vote greatly. Cheers, Bratschetalk 5 pillars 14:32, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

me too - belated thanks

edit

Thanks for supporting my RFA nearly a month ago, and congratulations on your own promotion! Unfortunately a sad event occurred at that time in my family, and I have not been able to participate in Wikipedia as much as I would like. I hope to get back to active contribution soon. Thanks again! Cheers, FreplySpang (talk) 00:02, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

RfA thanks

edit

Thank you for your support for my adminship. Gee, how many other contributions to Wikipedia would get such positive responses as do "support" votes in RfAs? If only it were all so easy and nice. Cheers, -Willmcw 06:25, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/06/26a User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/06/28a User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/06/28b User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/06/29b User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/06/30a

my RFA

edit

Hello, I just wanted to stop by and say thanks for your support in my RFA! You (Talk) June 30, 2005 16:23 (UTC)

User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/07/03a User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/07/03b

thanks!

edit

Hi Ingoolemo, thanks for your support of my RfA. I appreciate the vote of confidence, and I intend to do my best to take my new responsibilities seriously. See you around! --Spangineer (háblame) July 4, 2005 03:52 (UTC)

User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/07/05a

Thanks for your vote on Talrias' RFA

edit

Thanks for your supporting vote! Talrias (t | e | c) 9 July 2005 13:12 (UTC)

Image deletion warning Image:ATP space-filling image.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

RedWolf 05:01, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

Abbreviation of knots

edit

Hi,

I notice that you said Haven't seen kt as an abbreviation very frequently.. Perhaps you have not had cause to look at aviation weather forecasts. The official abbreviation as used by ICAO and member states in METAR and TAF etc has no 's' for the plural. Would you be prepared to reconsider your vote? Thanks. Bobblewik 13:50, 20 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/07/25a

urgent! aircontent template

edit

I've added "has relations=yes/no" to the template as well, since we're revising. Any changes you've made should be made again (sorry! ;) so that we can now control pretty much everything except similar aircraft, which should very nearly always exist. -eric 18:08, 2 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Footnotes at PBY Catalina

edit

That was quite a bit of work that you did to un-FUBAR my jury-rigged footnote scheme. I am in your debt. --Fernando Rizo T/C 20:19, 2 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/08/18a

This image is lacking information on its source.  If you could provide the 
source, it would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks, Ingoolemo talk 18:17, 2005 August 25 (UTC)

I'd forgotten where I got it from, but I was pretty sure it was a google images search. "site:.mil B-26 Marauder" yielded the source: http://www.ascho.wpafb.af.mil/REMARKABLE/PG-181.HTM. —Morven 18:58, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/08/28a User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/08/30a User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/08/31a

Bureaucratship

edit

Hi, Ingoolemo. Thank you so much for your support on my bureaucratship nomination. Unfortunately, it didn't pass, but I intend to run again soon. If you'd like to be informed next time around, please let me know on my talk page. Thanks again! Andre (talk) 05:29, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

WP:CCW

edit

Thou shalt not edit that page(eth) unless thou is parteth of the members. ;) Redwolf24 (talk) 05:51, 5 September 2005 (UTC)Reply