ImuImu

You, I think, need to familiarise yourself with some of Wikipedia's policies. I recommend that you start with Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, especially the following section:

Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space.

An important rule of thumb when writing biographical material about living persons is "do no harm". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. Biographies of living persons (BLP) must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy.

It might also be a good idea for you to review Wikipedia:Vandalism, especially the sections on what isn't vandalism. --Paul A 23:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Paul A

To: Paul A

Will revise these to meet Wiki standard. By the way I only contribute the fact about people who humiliated anc committed blasphemy at religious organizations. No incidents should be hidden.

Kazue Nii

The Kazue Nii article was overly negative and almost completely unsourced. Articles must be written in a neutral point of view and articles about living people must be well sourced. As the Kazue Nii article did not meet these requirements, it has been deleted. Mr.Z-man 06:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kazue Nii

A tag has been placed on Kazue Nii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onorem♠Dil 12:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove speedy tags

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with Kazue Nii. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.
Also, please note that only administrators can protect pages. Adding the template doesn't actually put any protection on the page.

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. --Onorem♠Dil 12:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Kazue Nii

Since this article is not bogus, this fact shall be here. This fact should not be deleted.

Some users might think the article is negative. Well, maybe. Why do I have to write a negative person positively? No one would want to write positively about corrupted people like Hitler right?

So this article should stay. So the reader will know the truth.

ImuImu

Please provide reliable sources that verify that this person is notable. I'm sorry that you don't like Kazue Nii and Gordon Combs or whatever relationship they may or may not share, but that doesn't mean that either one of them is notable by Wikipedia's standards. --Onorem♠Dil 12:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)