I.am.a.qwerty
I.am.a.qwerty | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes | |||||||||||
|
Your GA nomination of Women rabbis and Torah scholars
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Women rabbis and Torah scholars you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProfGray -- ProfGray (talk) 17:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Women rabbis and Torah scholars
editThe article Women rabbis and Torah scholars you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Women rabbis and Torah scholars and Talk:Women rabbis and Torah scholars/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProfGray -- ProfGray (talk) 21:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
GA Review of Women rabbis and Torah scholars article
editThe article Women rabbis and Torah scholars you nominated as a good article has failed ; for reasons why, see the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.
Meanwhile, I am also awarding you this barnstar for your extensive work on this article.
The Original Barnstar | ||
Kudos on your extensive writing about Jewish women ProfGray (talk) 15:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Women rabbis and Torah scholars
editThe article Women rabbis and Torah scholars you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Women rabbis and Torah scholars for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProfGray -- ProfGray (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of EyeCarePro for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EyeCarePro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.