Hussierhussier1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Hussierhussier1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

edit

Hi Hussierhussier1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!  samee  converse  06:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Naming Change from the Capture of Tanker Tuapse to the Capture of the Tuapse

edit

Good morning, Hussierhussier1,

Thank you for helping the improvement of the article. I used to abridge and summarize the professional data by abbreviation and codes therefore sometimes cut too many non-critical details to emphasize the key points, so it is great to see the wording clarified to facilitate readers' understanding. Nonetheless please do not remove the historical fact description and the introductive legal concepts for the general public understanding since I was the author of the original draft therefore am taking the legal consequence if the statement went wrong under the domestic criminal/civil laws, beside the international law which was my major in the graduate school, and why I started to fill in the missing links to the historical cases in the first place.
Please reinstated the article title from the "Tuapse" (a city name) to the "Tanker Tuapse" (named after the city after WWII) in accordance with the original ru-RU and zh-TW Wikipedia articles to avoid the potential confusion as the actual operation to capture the Tuapse city in October 1942 - Please see the reference in the source notes and the attribution sites to maintain naming consistency:
Thank you and hope you have a great day. Mickie-Mickie (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


Thank you for bring up your concerns! I see your point about consistency with other wikipedias, but I think that compared to similar English wiki articles, my title is consistent. Furthermore, I see your concern about confusion with the city Tuapse, but I don't think there would be that confusion, especially because an article on the capture of the city does not exist and any such article would be called "Capture of Tuapse," without "the."

https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Capture_of_the_Jeune_Richard

https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Capture_of_the_Young_Teazer


In some parts of the article, there were details that I removed because they were unclear, and I see you've put them back in some parts. I have asked for clarification on the article talk page from you so I can rewrite the sentences for clarity while keeping the details.

Hussierhussier1 (talk) 22:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Nations Buffer Zone in Cyprus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Operation Attila. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Let me add one more thing: Please don't mark potentially controversial edits as "minor", e.g. your addition of a complete unsourced sentence at Slavery. --Rsk6400 (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from wordplay

edit

You have recently changed word from urge to call. Please refrain from wordplay which changes the meaning of sentences and reduces NOPV. log Dsnb07 (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I changed the word not as a manner of changing the intent of the sentence, but because as a native English speaker, the sentence appeared grammatically incorrect to me. Even if it was technically grammatically correct, “urge” is almost never used as a noun. “Call” is the idiomatic term to use in the context. Hussierhussier1 (talk) 03:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mosco de Sidon

edit

There is a claim thatMosco de Sidon had discovered atoms century before ancient Greeks but it is present in his wikipedia page Cuando de hyiopi (talk) 12:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

A cup of tea for you!

edit
  thank you for your contributions!! :) xRozuRozu (tc) 21:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply