Hrh80

Please let me explain.....Mr.Shahid Mahmood is the father of Ms.Savera Nadeem who divorced Ms.Rabia his first wife when Ms.Savera Nadeem was twelve and married Ms.Madiha Gohar. It was Ms.Savera's mother and grand parents specially grand mother who took all the pains and looked after her. This can be confirmed from Ms.Savera Nadeem or her father who is presently the DMD PTV. I hope now you will yourself revert the changes back......Thanks.

Regional Powers

It is refreshing to see someone willing to help with the regional power article, and always good to see a user trying to help with one of the more contentious parts of the article (in this case, Turkey). Now, you suggest that Wikipedia refers to Turkey as European. If you could, do you mind presenting that? It is also worth mentioning that the sources that back Turkey up as a regional power lean towards supporting it as a Middle Eastern regional power, and not a European regional power. If it were to be considered in Europe, reliable authoritative sources would be required to suggest Turkey as a European regional power. Until then, I'm reverting Turkey back to it's default and most accurate place as a Middle Eastern regional power. (nb; by saying most accurate, I am suggesting only that Turkey most definately exerts influence in the Middle East). If you could be so kind as to present where Wikipedia suggest Turkey as European, and even provide links to sources suggesting Turkey as a European regional power (on the Regional Power talk page, preferably), a compromise and constructive addition to the article might be reached. Cheers. Comics (talk) 07:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Truth

Your reversions on the SUPARCO article are inappropriate. I am not going to correct them either since I guess this is coming from your blind patriotism. Anyways, you can lie to every one but at the end of the day you know that they are lies. The source I put and still is on the article is from Associated Press of Pakistan clearly saying that the satellite is being manufactured by China and in China. When it is launched China will announce it as such. Lies do not stay hidden for a long time.--119.153.82.76 (talk) 02:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Pictures in Asian American infobox

I think the Tennis Player Michael Chang was suppose to be there for Taiwanese Americans, and Bruce Lee as a Kongkonganese American (if there is even such a self describing group). But both can be subsumed into the larger Chinese American ethnicity. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok thanks its just that some were adding more then 1 for each ethnicity and i wasn't too sure whether they were considered chinese or not Hrh80 (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Please take a moment to read this page

Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments

Regards, 82.5.112.182 (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Pakistan as regional power

Pakistan as regional power cannot be accepted unless a verified authentic source is provided stating it does. The sources provided for in the books The United States and the Great Powers & Regions and powers: the structure of international security are authentic but do not anywhere claim or suggest Pakistan to be a regional power. If you have further problems with this please go to wiki help also read the rules and regulations. I clearly own The United States and the great powers (2004) by Barry Buzan book and Pakistan is not stated as a regional power in the entire book. This matter needs to be solved bu wiki admins. Till then it is unverifiable according to wiki CC-BY-SA 3.0 License as there is an opposition to the source.Neilpine (talk) 23:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Source

Google does provide the link to the book but only the first 25 pages can be viewed thus no third party except Wikipedia itself can now verify the content.Neilpine (talk) 23:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Source

I don't understand which part you do not get we have a source each of us claim some thing different, until the admin sees the validity of the source to be true the source cannot be used as stated in wikis Terms of Use. However if you wish to defy this, I would be more thant happy topoint this out to the admin and defiance of the Terms of Use results in Banning. Try to act civilized if you cant be. Neilpine (talk) 23:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 23:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule at Regional power. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 00:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Musharraf and susilo 2007.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Musharraf and susilo 2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)